IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v28y2008i2p201-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of a Physician's Use of a Diagnostic Decision Aid on the Malpractice Verdicts of Mock Jurors

Author

Listed:
  • Hal R. Arkes

    (Department of Psychology; Division of Health Services, Management, and Policy; and the Center for Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evaluation Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, arkes.1@osu.edu)

  • Victoria A. Shaffer

    (Department of Psychology, Wichita State University, Kansas)

  • Mitchell A. Medow

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus)

Abstract

Background . One reason why physicians may be reluctant to use diagnostic decision aids is that such usage might increase the likelihood of an unfavorable malpractice verdict. The authors tested this hypothesis by sending a DVD of a malpractice trial to a national sample of jury-eligible adults. Methods. There were 3 independent variables: 1) the physician did or did not use a diagnostic aid, 2) the patient's symptoms either were or were not consistent with a diagnosis of probable appendicitis, and 3) the physician's decision to operate or not operate was either concordant or discordant with the severity of the patient's symptoms. Jurors rendered a verdict, and if they deemed the physician not to have met the standard of care, they indicated how punitive they felt toward the physician. Results . Mock jurors were more likely to side with the physician-defendant if he recommended an operation when there were many symptoms and refrained when there were few symptoms compared with a physician who did the converse. The use of a decision aid had no influence on this binary standard-of-care decision. Among those physicians deemed liable by the jurors, defying the aid resulted in heightened punishment compared with heeding it. Conclusion . Contrary to many physicians' fears, use of a diagnostic decision aid did not influence the likelihood of an adverse malpractice verdict. Complying with the aid's recommendation provided a measure of protection against jurors' punitiveness for those physicians deemed liable for malpractice.

Suggested Citation

  • Hal R. Arkes & Victoria A. Shaffer & Mitchell A. Medow, 2008. "The Influence of a Physician's Use of a Diagnostic Decision Aid on the Malpractice Verdicts of Mock Jurors," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(2), pages 201-208, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:201-208
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07313280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07313280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X07313280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen Thi, Phi Linh & Briancon, S. & Empereur, F. & Guillemin, F., 2002. "Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 493-504, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanacore, Amalia & Pellegrino, Maria Sole, 2021. "Testing inter-group ranking heterogeneity: do patient characteristics matter for prioritization of quality improvements in healthcare service?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Atkinson, Sarah & Haran, Dave, 2005. "Individual and district scale determinants of users' satisfaction with primary health care in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 501-513, February.
    3. Radin, Dagmar, 2013. "Does corruption undermine trust in health care? Results from public opinion polls in Croatia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 46-53.
    4. Jongnam Hwang & Giang Thu Vu & Bach Xuan Tran & Thu Hong Thi Nguyen & Bang Van Nguyen & Long Hoang Nguyen & Huong Lan Thi Nguyen & Carl A Latkin & Cyrus S H Ho & Roger C M Ho, 2020. "Measuring satisfaction with health care services for Vietnamese patients with cardiovascular diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Sabine Davoll & Christoph Kowalski & Kathrin Kuhr & Oliver Ommen & Nicole Ernstmann & Holger Pfaff, 2013. "“Tendency to excuse” and patient satisfaction of those suffering with breast cancer," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(3), pages 385-393, June.
    6. Shimaa Elkomy & Zahra Murad & Veronica Veleanu, 2018. "Does Leadership Matter for Healthcare Service Quality? Evidence from NHS England," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2018-08, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    7. Elisabeth Patiraki & Chryssoula Karlou & Georgios Efstathiou & Haritini Tsangari & Anastasios Merkouris & Darja Jarosova & Helena Leino-Kilpi & Riitta Suhonen & Zoltan Balogh & Alvisa Palese & Marco T, 2014. "The Relationship Between Surgical Patients and Nurses Characteristics With Their Perceptions of Caring Behaviors," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 132-152, April.
    8. Pérotin, Virginie & Zamora, Bernarda & Reeves, Rachel & Bartlett, Will & Allen, Pauline, 2013. "Does hospital ownership affect patient experience? An investigation into public–private sector differences in England," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 633-646.
    9. Jomon A. Paul & Benedikt Quosigk & Leo MacDonald, 2019. "Factors Impacting Market Concentration of Not-for-Profit Hospitals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 517-535, January.
    10. Meesala, Appalayya & Paul, Justin, 2018. "Service quality, consumer satisfaction and loyalty in hospitals: Thinking for the future," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 261-269.
    11. Bin Ding & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dongxiao Gu & Fang Bian & Xuefeng Shao, 2019. "Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Mitropoulos, Panagiotis & Vasileiou, Konstantinos & Mitropoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Understanding quality and satisfaction in public hospital services: A nationwide inpatient survey in Greece," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 270-275.
    13. Salman Majeed & Zhimin Zhou & Haywantee Ramkissoon, 2020. "Beauty and Elegance: Value Co-Creation in Cosmetic Surgery Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    14. Park, Kisoo & Park, Jumin & Kwon, Young Dae & Kang, Yoonjeong & Noh, Jin-Won, 2016. "Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 621-629.
    15. Abid Hussain & Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Jinsoo Hwang & Noman Sahito & Shahida Kanwel, 2019. "Promoting OPD Patient Satisfaction through Different Healthcare Determinants: A Study of Public Sector Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:201-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.