IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v23y2003i2p112-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Paul S. Heckerling
  • Ben S. Gerber
  • Thomas G. Tape
  • Robert S. Wigton

Abstract

Background. Artificial neural networks (ANN) have been used in the prediction of several medical conditions but have not been previously used to predict pneumonia. The authors used ANN to predict the presence or absence of pneumonia among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute respiratory complaints and compared the results with those obtained using logistic regression modeling. Methods. Feed-forward back-propagation ANN were trained on sociodemographic, symptom, sign, comorbidity, and radiographic outcome data among 1044 patients from the University of Illinois (the training cohort) and were applied to 116 patients from the University of Nebraska (the testing cohort). ANN trained using different strategies were compared to each other and to main-effects logistic regression. Calibration accuracy was measured as mean square error and discrimination accuracy as the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results. A 1 hidden-layer ANN trained using oversampling of pneumonia cases had an ROC area in the training cohort of 0.895, which was greater than the area of 0.840 for logistic regression ( P = 0.026). This ANN had an ROC area in the testing cohort of 0.872, not significantly different from its area in the training cohort ( P = 0.597). Operating at a threshold of 0.25, the ANN would have detected 94% to 95% of patients with pneumonia in the 2 cohorts while correctly excluding 39% to 50% of patients with other conditions. ANN trained using other strategies discriminated equally in the 2 cohorts but no better than did logistic regression. Conclusions. Among adults presenting with acute respiratory illness, ANN accurately discriminated patients with and without pneumonia and, under some circumstances, improved on the accuracy of logistic regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul S. Heckerling & Ben S. Gerber & Thomas G. Tape & Robert S. Wigton, 2003. "Prediction of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 112-121, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:2:p:112-121
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03251247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X03251247
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X03251247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene Somoza & John R. Somoza, 1993. "A Neural-network Approach to Predicting Admission Decisions in a Psychiatric Emergency Room," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 13(4), pages 273-280, December.
    2. Allan Gottschalk & M. Chris Hyzer & Ralph T. Geer, 2000. "A Comparison of Human and Machine-based Predictions of Successful Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(2), pages 160-169, April.
    3. Will Penny & David Frost, 1996. "Neural Networks in Clinical Medicine," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(4), pages 386-398, October.
    4. Thomas G. Tape & Paul S. Heckerling & Joseph P. Ornato & Robert S. Wigton, 1991. "Use of Clinical Judgment Analysis to Explain Regional Variations in Physicians' Accuracies in Diagnosing Pneumonia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(3), pages 189-197, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammet Gul & Ali Fuat Guneri, 2016. "An artificial neural network-based earthquake casualty estimation model for Istanbul city," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2163-2178, December.
    2. Nida Shahid & Tim Rappon & Whitney Berta, 2019. "Applications of artificial neural networks in health care organizational decision-making: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Yates, J. Frank & Lee, Ju-Whei & Shinotsuka, Hiromi & Patalano, Andrea L. & Sieck, Winston R., 1998. "Cross-Cultural Variations in Probability Judgment Accuracy: Beyond General Knowledge Overconfidence?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 89-117, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:2:p:112-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.