IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/manlab/v30y2005i4p301-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Promises Really Win Compliances in Purchasing Decision-Making?

Author

Listed:
  • Che-Jen Su

Abstract

The author follows interpersonal viewpoint and focus on promises as an influence strategy used in buying centers. Responses in Taiwan are collected and used from a survey of 208 purchase decisions in a LISREL model linking source/target characteristics, the manifest influence, and the choice of promises. Support is found for hypothetically positive effects of the reward power and the source's personal reason to influence on the utilization of promises. By contrast, the source's organizational level and the target's dependence on the source showed no impact on this influence tactic. The use of promises appears ineffective in changing a target's behaviors and opinions in buying centers. The target's dependence on the source, however, is found to be the leading role in winning compliances in buying centers. As predicted, our results demonstrated the positive relationship between the target's status and personal motives to exercise influence strategies. Counter to our expectations, the target's status appeared to increase slightly the likelihood of promises in the process of purchasing decision-making, and this factor, together with reward power, were believed to be the leading roles of forming promises by statistics. On the basis of these findings, the author identifies implications for the impact that structural changes within dyadic relationship can have on the choice of promises.

Suggested Citation

  • Che-Jen Su, 2005. "Do Promises Really Win Compliances in Purchasing Decision-Making?," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 30(4), pages 301-314, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:30:y:2005:i:4:p:301-314
    DOI: 10.1177/0258042X0503000401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X0503000401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0258042X0503000401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William T. Ross, Jr. & Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1997. "Performance in Principal-Agent Dyads: The Causes and Consequences of Perceived Asymmetry of Commitment to the Relationship," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 680-704, May.
    2. Beatty, Sharon E & Talpade, Salil, 1994. "Adolescent Influence in Family Decision Making: A Replication with Extension," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 332-341, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koehler, C.F. & Breugelmans, E. & Dellaert, B.G.C., 2010. "Consumer Acceptance of Recommendations by Interactive Decision Aids: The Joint Role of Temporal Distance and Concrete vs. Abstract Communications," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-041-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Akhter Ali & N. Ravichandran & D.K. Batra, 2013. "Children’s Choice of Influence Strategies in Family Purchase Decisions and the Impact of Demographics," Vision, , vol. 17(1), pages 27-40, March.
    3. Dewani, Prem Prakash & Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mathur, Sameer, 2016. "Role of gratitude and obligation in long term customer relationships," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-156.
    4. Manish Mittal, 2011. "Television Viewing and Perception of Parental Concern among Urban Indian Children," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 36(1), pages 45-59, February.
    5. Labrecque, JoAnne & Ricard, Line, 2001. "Children's influence on family decision-making: a restaurant study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 173-176, November.
    6. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    7. Stephen Ntuara Kiriinya, 2014. "Determinants of Children's Influence on Family Purchase Decisions in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(7), pages 325-339, July.
    8. Singh, Pallavi & Sahadev, Sunil & Oates, Caroline J. & Alevizou, Panayiota, 2020. "Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 110-121.
    9. Hansen, Torben & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2018. "The influence of consumers’ interest in healthy eating, definitions of healthy eating, and personal values on perceived dietary quality," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 55-67.
    10. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 2021. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1559-1590, October.
    11. Pecot, Fabien & Merchant, Altaf & Valette-Florence, Pierre & De Barnier, Virginie, 2018. "Cognitive outcomes of brand heritage: A signaling perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 304-316.
    12. Chetna Arora & Saloni Pawan Diwan, 2022. "Children influence on family purchase decisions across product categories," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Evelyn Toh Bee Hwa Author_Email: toh.evelyn@taylors.edu.my & Eva Lim Wei Lee & Robin Cheng, 2011. "Generation Y And Choice Of Mobile Service Provider: A Study On Their Purchasing Decisions In Choosing A Mobile Service Provider," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-226, Conference Master Resources.
    14. Wang, Sijun & Holloway, Betsy B. & Beatty, Sharon E. & Hill, William W., 2007. "Adolescent influence in family purchase decisions: An update and cross-national extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1117-1124, November.
    15. Jiří Šindelář & Petr Budinský, 2018. "Agent-zákazník problém v distribuci finančních produktů [Agent-Principal Problem in Financial Distribution]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(4), pages 491-507.
    16. Yossi Gavish, 2013. "Family Consumption Decisions: Literature Review and Extension —The Psycho-Social Case of Single-Mother Families and Their Early Adolescent Daughters," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(4), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Kozak, Metin, 2010. "Holiday taking decisions – The role of spouses," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 489-494.
    18. Dharminder Kumar Batra & Akhter Ali, 2015. "Parent’s Opinion of Children’s Influence in Purchase Decisions: A Comparative Analysis between Rural and Urban Delhi," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1100-1111, December.
    19. Noha El-Bassiouny & Ahmed Taher & Ehab M. Abou Aish, 2008. "The Importance of Character Education for Tweens as Consumers," Working Papers 11, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    20. Yuan, Ruizhi & Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo, 2024. "It takes two to tango: The role of interactivity in enhancing customer engagement on sharing economy platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:30:y:2005:i:4:p:301-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.xlri.ac.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.