IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v34y2019i2p196-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Combined Authorities in England strategic and fit for purpose?

Author

Listed:
  • John Shutt
  • Joyce Liddle

Abstract

This paper focuses on new governance arrangements in an English context and seeks to answer the question on whether or not Combined Authorities are strategic or fit for purpose. Combined Authorities are a fragmented response to changing boundaries, employment and labour markets and the desire for functional geographies to aid competition in a global world, but also a response to the UK and English devolution conundrum. The paper highlights some of the challenges and issues arising in a BREXIT era and points to some key research priorities for the future. Drawing on the findings from all papers presented in the special issue, the authors conclude that in a post BREXIT world there will be an even greater imperative for the leaders of Britain’s cities and towns to simultaneously act locally and globally in developing economic development strategies to transform local economies.

Suggested Citation

  • John Shutt & Joyce Liddle, 2019. "Are Combined Authorities in England strategic and fit for purpose?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 196-207, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:196-207
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094219839956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094219839956
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094219839956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markku Sotarauta & Andrew Beer & John Gibney, 2017. "Making sense of leadership in urban and regional development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 187-193, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward Yates & Ian Clark & William Rossiter, 2021. "Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 115-132, March.
    2. Kate Broadhurst & Jennifer Ferreira & Nigel Berkeley, 2021. "Collaborative leadership and place-based development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163, March.
    3. John Shutt & Joyce Liddle, 2020. "Comparing the development of Local Industrial Strategies across the Northern Powerhouse: Key emerging issues," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 297-315, June.
    4. Geoff Bates & Charles Larkin & Nick Pearce & Laura Smyth, 2023. "Policy ‘R&D’, capacity and advocacy in English Combined Authorities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(3), pages 226-241, May.
    5. Erica Russell & Ian Christie, 2021. "The Remaking of Institutions for Local Climate Governance? Towards Understanding Climate Governance in a Multi-Level UK Local Government Area: A Micro-Local Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurikka, Heli & Grillitsch, Markus, 2020. "Resilience in the periphery: What an agency perspective can bring to the table," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Albers, Hans-Hermann & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Place leadership and corporate spatial responsibilities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 108-130.
    3. Leendertse, Jip & Schrijvers, Mirella & Stam, Erik, 2022. "Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    4. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Celeste Varum & Ana Dias Daniel, 2021. "Introducing microeconomic foundation in data envelopment analysis: effects of the ex ante regulation principle on regional performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1215-1244, September.
    5. Pere Castell & Ramon Ramon-Muñoz, 2022. "Deterministic and Contingent Factors in the Genesis of Agribusiness Clusters: The Pigmeat Industry in Nineteenth-Century Catalonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Tran Minh Ngoc & Huynh Dang Bich Vy, 2023. "Exploring the internal drivers of SMEs’ resilience: The case of Ho Chi Minh City SMEs in the context of Covid-19," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(1), pages 103-120.
    7. Erik Stam & Andrew Ven, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 809-832, February.
    8. Marco Bellandi, 2021. "Factors Supporting or Hindering the Place-based Structure of Commons in Local Productive Systems," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 8, pages 1-14.
    9. Dagmara Kociuba & Mariusz Sagan & Waldemar Kociuba, 2023. "Toward the Smart City Ecosystem Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Will Rossiter & David J Smith, 2017. "Institutions, place leadership and public entrepreneurship: Reinterpreting the economic development of Nottingham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(4), pages 374-392, June.
    11. Kate Broadhurst & Jennifer Ferreira & Nigel Berkeley, 2021. "Collaborative leadership and place-based development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163, March.
    12. Maximilian Benner, 2021. "System-level agency and its many shades: How to shape the system for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Markus Grillitsch & Bjørn Asheim & Arne Isaksen & Hjalti Nielsen, 2022. "Advancing the treatment of human agency in the analysis of regional economic development: Illustrated with three Norwegian cases," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 248-275, March.
    14. Shuaijun Xue & Robert Hassink, 2021. "Combinatorial knowledge bases, proximity and agency across space: the case of the high-end medical device industry in Shanghai," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_04, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    15. Marco Bellandi & Monica Plechero & Erica Santini, 2022. "Distretti industriali italiani in cambiamento e place leadership," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 73-82.
    16. Albers, Hans-Hermann & Suwala, Lech, 2018. "Unternehmensengagement als Standortfaktor – mit der Wirtschaft attraktive (Klein-) Städte schaffen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6, pages 50-57.
    17. David, Lucinda, 2019. "How Term Limits Constrain the Emergence of Agency and Resilience," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Lin Ye & Xiangeng Peng & Laura Quadros Aniche & Peter H. T. Scholten & Elena Marie Ensenado, 2021. "Urban renewal as policy innovation in China: From growth stimulation to sustainable development," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 23-33, February.
    19. Mathieu P A Steijn & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & David L Rigby, 2023. "Technological diversification of U.S. cities during the great historical crises," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 1303-1344.
    20. Dane Anderton, 2017. "Changing leadership in peripheral city region development: The case of Liverpool’s high technology sectors," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(4), pages 352-373, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:196-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.