IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v57y2020i2p221-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical sightings of better angels: Analysing the distribution of battle-deaths in interstate conflict over time

Author

Listed:
  • Céline Cunen

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo)

  • Nils Lid Hjort

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo)

  • HÃ¥vard Mokleiv NygÃ¥rd

    (Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO))

Abstract

Have great wars become less violent over time, and is there something we might identify as the long peace ? We investigate statistical versions of such questions, by examining the number of battle-deaths in the Correlates of War dataset, with 95 interstate wars from 1816 to 2007. Previous research has found this series of wars to be stationary, with no apparent change over time. We develop a framework to find and assess a change-point in this battle-deaths series. Our change-point methodology takes into consideration the power law distribution of the data, models the full battle-deaths distribution, as opposed to focusing merely on the extreme tail, and evaluates the uncertainty in the estimation. Using this framework, we find evidence that the series has not been as stationary as past research has indicated. Our statistical sightings of better angels indicate that 1950 represents the most likely change-point in the battle-deaths series – the point in time where the battle-deaths distribution might have changed for the better.

Suggested Citation

  • Céline Cunen & Nils Lid Hjort & HÃ¥vard Mokleiv NygÃ¥rd, 2020. "Statistical sightings of better angels: Analysing the distribution of battle-deaths in interstate conflict over time," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 221-234, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:57:y:2020:i:2:p:221-234
    DOI: 10.1177/0022343319896843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022343319896843
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022343319896843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blackwell, Matthew, 2018. "Game Changers: Detecting Shifts in Overdispersed Count Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 230-239, April.
    2. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch & Steve Pickering, 2014. "Wars are becoming less frequent: a response to Harrison and Wolf," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 67(1), pages 214-230, February.
    3. Western, Bruce & Kleykamp, Meredith, 2004. "A Bayesian Change Point Model for Historical Time Series Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 354-374.
    4. Mark Harrison & Nikolaus Wolf, 2014. "The Frequency of Wars," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMICS OF COERCION AND CONFLICT, chapter 5, pages 121-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Cederman, Lars-Erik, 2003. "Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 135-150, February.
    6. Cederman, Lars-Erik & Warren, T. Camber & Sornette, Didier, 2011. "Testing Clausewitz: Nationalism, Mass Mobilization, and the Severity of War," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 605-638, October.
    7. Spirling, Arthur, 2007. "Bayesian Approaches for Limited Dependent Variable Change Point Problems," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 387-405.
    8. repec:cup:apsrev:v:87:y:1993:i:03:p:624-638_27 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Cirillo, Pasquale & Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2016. "On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 29-45.
    10. Maoz, Zeev & Russett, Bruce, 1993. "Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(3), pages 624-638, September.
    11. Michael Spagat & Stijn van Weezel, 2018. "On the decline of war," Working Papers 201815, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Céline Cunen & Nils Lid Hjort, 2022. "Combining information across diverse sources: The II‐CC‐FF paradigm," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 625-656, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Harrison & Nikolaus Wolf, 2014. "The frequency of wars: reply to Gleditsch and Pickering," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 67(1), pages 231-239, February.
    2. Brennen T. Fagan & Marina I. Knight & Niall J. MacKay & A. Jamie Wood, 2020. "Change point analysis of historical battle deaths," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 909-933, June.
    3. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    4. Yang-Ming Chang & Manaf Sellak, 2024. "Conflict and agreement in the collective choice of trade policies: implications for interstate disputes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 103-135, April.
    5. Rota, Mauro, 2016. "Military spending, fiscal capacity and the democracy puzzle," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 41-51.
    6. William R. Thompson & Richard Tucker, 1997. "Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(3), pages 462-477, June.
    7. Choong-Nam Kang, 2017. "Capability revisited: Ally’s capability and dispute initiation1," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(5), pages 546-571, September.
    8. Ruggieri, Eric & Antonellis, Marcus, 2016. "An exact approach to Bayesian sequential change point detection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 71-86.
    9. William R. Thompson & Richard Tucker, 1997. "A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(3), pages 428-454, June.
    10. Holger Mölder, 2023. "The prospects of strategic imagination in explaining international security challenges," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 55-76, April.
    11. Fleming, Sean W., 2021. "Scale-free networks, 1/f dynamics, and nonlinear conflict size scaling from an agent-based simulation model of societal-scale bilateral conflict and cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    12. William Reed, 2003. "Information and Economic Interdependence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(1), pages 54-71, February.
    13. Méon, Pierre-Guillaume & Sekkat, Khalid, 2022. "A time to throw stones, a time to reap: how long does it take for democratic transitions to improve institutional outcomes?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 429-443, June.
    14. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    15. Ben Li & Penglong Zhang, 2016. "International Geopolitics," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 909, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 06 Feb 2017.
    16. Vanessa Alexandra Boese & Matthew Charles Wilson, 2023. "Contestation and participation: Concepts, measurement, and inference," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(2), pages 89-106, June.
    17. Jamil Civitarese, 2020. "Saifedean Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2018. xxviii + 304 pages. USD 29.95 (hardcover)," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 403-406, September.
    18. Dmitry Brizhinev & Nathan Ryan & Roger Bradbury, 2018. "Modelling Hegemonic Power Transition in Cyberspace," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, April.
    19. Gökçe, Osman Zeki & Hatipoglu, Emre & Belaïd, Fateh, 2024. "Navigating energy diplomacy in times of recovery and conflict: A study of cross-border energy trade dynamics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. repec:ial:wpaper:5 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Walter Riker, 2009. "The Democratic Peace is Not Democratic: On Behalf of Rawls’ Decent Societies," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 617-638, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:57:y:2020:i:2:p:221-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.