IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v66y2022i4-5p924-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introducing the Peacekeeping Mandates (PEMA) Dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Di Salvatore
  • Magnus Lundgren
  • Kseniya Oksamytna
  • Hannah M. Smidt

Abstract

Research on UN peacekeeping operations has established that operations' size and composition affect peacekeeping success. However, we lack systematic data for evaluating whether variation in tasks assigned to UN peacekeeping mandates matters and what explains different configurations of mandated tasks in the first place. Drawing on UN Security Council resolutions that establish, extend, or revise mandates of 27 UN peacekeeping operations in Africa in the 1991–2017 period, the Peacekeeping Mandates (PEMA) dataset fills this gap. It records 41 distinct tasks, ranging from disarmament to reconciliation and electoral support. For each task, the PEMA dataset also distinguishes between three modalities of engagement (monitoring, assisting, and securing) and whether the task is requested or merely encouraged. To illustrate the usefulness of our data, we re-examine Hultman, Kathman, and Shannon’s (2013) analysis of operations’ ability to protect civilians. Our results show that host governments and rebel groups respond differently to civilian protection mandates.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Di Salvatore & Magnus Lundgren & Kseniya Oksamytna & Hannah M. Smidt, 2022. "Introducing the Peacekeeping Mandates (PEMA) Dataset," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 924-951, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:4-5:p:924-951
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027211068897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027211068897
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027211068897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hylke Dijkstra, 2015. "Shadow bureaucracies and the unilateral control of international secretariats: Insights from UN peacekeeping," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 23-41, March.
    2. Fjelde, Hanne & Hultman, Lisa & Nilsson, Desirée, 2019. "Protection Through Presence: UN Peacekeeping and the Costs of Targeting Civilians," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 103-131, January.
    3. Gabriella Lloyd, 2021. "New Data on UN Mission Mandates 1948–2015: Tasks Assigned to Missions in their Mandates (TAMM)," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1149-1160, September.
    4. Deniz Cil & Hanne Fjelde & Lisa Hultman & Desirée Nilsson, 2020. "Mapping blue helmets: Introducing the Geocoded Peacekeeping Operations (Geo-PKO) dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 360-370, March.
    5. Hultman, Lisa & Kathman, Jacob & Shannon, Megan, 2014. "Beyond Keeping Peace: United Nations Effectiveness in the Midst of Fighting," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(4), pages 737-753, November.
    6. John Gledhill & Richard Caplan & Maline Meiske, 2021. "Developing peace: the evolution of development goals and activities in United Nations peacekeeping," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 201-229, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maekawa, Wakako, 2024. "United Nations peacekeeping operations and multilateral foreign aid: Credibility of good governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Susanna P. Campbell & Aila M. Matanock, 2024. "Weapons of the weak state: How post-conflict states shape international statebuilding," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 469-513, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle Benson & Colin Tucker, 2022. "The Importance of UN Security Council Resolutions in Peacekeeping Operations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(3), pages 473-503, April.
    2. Maekawa, Wakako, 2024. "United Nations peacekeeping operations and multilateral foreign aid: Credibility of good governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Deniz Cil & Hanne Fjelde & Lisa Hultman & Desirée Nilsson, 2020. "Mapping blue helmets: Introducing the Geocoded Peacekeeping Operations (Geo-PKO) dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 360-370, March.
    4. Hannah M. Smidt, 2020. "United Nations Peacekeeping Locally: Enabling Conflict Resolution, Reducing Communal Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(2-3), pages 344-372, February.
    5. Wukki Kim & Todd Sandler & Hirofumi Shimizu, 2020. "A Multi‐Transition Approach to Evaluating Peacekeeping Effectiveness," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 543-567, November.
    6. Lopera-Arbeláez, Isabel & Richter, Solveig, 2024. "Transformative approaches for peace-centred sustainable development: The role of social and solidarity economy," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    7. M Christian Lehmann, 2023. "Foreign interests and state repression: Theory and evidence from the Armenian genocide," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(2), pages 307-321, March.
    8. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Trust Funds as a Lever of Influence at International Development Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 85-95, August.
    9. Michal Parízek, 2017. "Control, soft information, and the politics of international organizations staffing," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 559-583, December.
    10. David E. Cunningham, 2018. "Jaroslav Tir and Johannes Karreth. 2018. Incentivizing Peace: How International Organizations Can Help Prevent Civil Wars in Member Countries (New York: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 627-630, December.
    11. Constantin Ruhe, 2021. "Impeding fatal violence through third-party diplomacy: The effect of mediation on conflict intensity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 687-701, July.
    12. Steffen Eckhard & Vytautas Jankauskas, 2020. "Explaining the political use of evaluation in international organizations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 667-695, December.
    13. Nomikos, William George, 2021. "Unintended Consequences: Reconsidering the Effects of UN Peacekeeping on State-sponsored Violence," OSF Preprints 8h6fs, Center for Open Science.
    14. Sebastian Schutte & Claire Kelling, 2022. "A Monte Carlo analysis of false inference in spatial conflict event studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Kelly M Kadera & Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, 2018. "Gendered participation, well-being, and representations in political violence: An introduction," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(3), pages 211-214, May.
    16. Han Dorussen & Tobias Böhmelt & Govinda Clayton, 2022. "Sequencing United Nations peacemaking: Political initiatives and peacekeeping operations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(1), pages 24-48, January.
    17. Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2017. "Dangerous bargains with the devil? Incorporating new approaches in peace science for the study of war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 98-116, January.
    18. Vineet Kapoor & William Flavin & Peter Ochs & Thomas Matyók & Essam Fahim, 2022. "Community Policing Solutions for Religion-on-Religion Conflict: Lessons from an Indian Case Study," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Gizelis Theodora-Ismene, 2018. "Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Organizational reform and the rise of trust funds: Lessons from the World Bank," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 199-226, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:4-5:p:924-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.