IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v63y2019i3p811-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0: Logic, Characteristics, and Comparisons to Alternative Datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Zeev Maoz
  • Paul L. Johnson
  • Jasper Kaplan
  • Fiona Ogunkoya
  • Aaron P. Shreve

Abstract

We introduce the new, substantially updated, and revised version of the Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) dataset. We discuss the underlying logic of constructing dyadic MIDs and demonstrate that these operations generate significant differences between the actual occurrence and properties of MID dyads and those extracted from machine-generated programs such as EUGene, or from the MID participant dataset. We provide some descriptive measures of dyadic MIDs over the period of 1816 to 2010 and compare some of the key dyadic results on the correlates of MIDs using different datasets. We discuss the theoretical and empirical implications of our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeev Maoz & Paul L. Johnson & Jasper Kaplan & Fiona Ogunkoya & Aaron P. Shreve, 2019. "The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0: Logic, Characteristics, and Comparisons to Alternative Datasets," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 811-835, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:63:y:2019:i:3:p:811-835
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002718784158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002718784158
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002718784158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cranmer, Skyler J. & Desmarais, Bruce A., 2011. "Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 66-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darko Cherepnalkoski & Andreas Karpf & Igor Mozetič & Miha Grčar, 2016. "Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    3. Ruslan Rinatovich Abezgildin, 0. "Relevant Issues Determining the Effectiveness of Policy Networks," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 10.
    4. Olivier Godechot & Joanne Horton & Yuval Millo, 2022. "Executive Pay: Board Reciprocity Counts," Post-Print hal-03924965, HAL.
    5. Jan Beyers & Tom Donas, 2014. "Inter-regional networks in Brussels: Analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 547-571, December.
    6. Dong, Qingli & Zhao, Yanzhi & Ma, Xiaojun & Zhou, Yanan, 2024. "Risk spillover between carbon markets and stock markets from a progressive perspective: Measurements, spillover networks, and driving factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Pauls, Scott D. & Cranmer, Skyler J., 2017. "Affinity communities in United Nations voting: Implications for democracy, cooperation, and conflict," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 484(C), pages 428-439.
    8. Daniele Fanelli & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2013. "Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Durante, Daniele & Dunson, David B., 2014. "Bayesian dynamic financial networks with time-varying predictors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 19-26.
    10. Gallemore, Caleb & Di Gregorio, Monica & Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Prasti H., Rut Dini, 2015. "Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 168-179.
    11. Fred Feinberg & Elizabeth Bruch & Michael Braun & Brett Hemenway Falk & Nina Fefferman & Elea McDonnell Feit & John Helveston & Daniel Larremore & Blakeley B. McShane & Alice Patania & Mario L. Small, 2020. "Choices in networks: a research framework," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 349-359, December.
    12. Emily V. Bell, 2024. "Climate risk perceptions, change in water demand, and preferences for future interlocal collaboration," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Jungwon Yeo, 2023. "Interorganizational Coordination for Immigrant Integration into Local Society," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 567-585, June.
    14. Alexandra Goritz & Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Sudeshna Paul & A. James O'Malley, 2013. "Hierarchical longitudinal models of relationships in social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(5), pages 705-722, November.
    16. Daniel Straulino & Mattie Landman & Neave O'Clery, 2020. "A bi-directional approach to comparing the modular structure of networks," Papers 2010.06568, arXiv.org.
    17. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Godechot, Olivier, 2018. "Note from the editor: Networks for economic sociology (and not the other way around)," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3.
    19. Gallemore, Caleb & Jespersen, Kristjan, 2016. "Transnational Markets for Sustainable Development Governance: The Case of REDD+," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 79-94.
    20. García, Javier Sánchez & Rambaud, Salvador Cruz, 2023. "Macrofinancial determinants of volatility transmission in a network of European sovereign debt markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:63:y:2019:i:3:p:811-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.