IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v20y1976i2p213-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Role of Congress in Defense Policy-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J. Laurance

    (Department of Government Naval Postgraduate School)

Abstract

The role of Congress in defense policy-making has clearly been changing since 1968. The objective of this study is to describe and explain this change through the use of systemic indicators. A set of behavioral rules for the 1947–1967 period is developed by examining previous studies. Then empirical indicators are developed for the inputs, conversion processes, and outputs of the Congressional defense policy system. These indicators point to an increased role for Congress in the 1968–1974 period. Major factors explaining this change include the Vietnam War, decreased public perception of external threat, a rise in non-DOD defense policy alternatives, increased control of military procurement, a balanced Senate Armed Services Committee, continuing debate on national priorities, and the rise of a legitimate Congressional bloc critical of defense policy. Key variables in assessing the permanence of the change appear to be public perception of threat stemming from U.S.-Soviet relations and the conflict between foreign and domestic spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J. Laurance, 1976. "The Changing Role of Congress in Defense Policy-Making," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(2), pages 213-252, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:20:y:1976:i:2:p:213-252
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277602000202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277602000202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277602000202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Otto A. & Dempster, M. A. H. & Wildavsky, Aaron, 1966. "A Theory of the Budgetary Process," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 529-547, September.
    2. Jackson, John E., 1971. "Statistical Models of Senate Roll Call Voting," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 451-470, June.
    3. Fenno, Richard F., 1962. "The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(2), pages 310-324, June.
    4. Mueller, John E., 1971. "Trends in Popular Support for the Wars in Korea and Vietnam 1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 358-375, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Macdonald, 1976. "Causal modelling in politics and sociology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 189-208, September.
    2. Valentino Larcinese & Leonzio Rizzo & Cecilia Testa, 2007. "Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 07/01, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised May 2007.
    3. Hannelore Weck-Hannemann, 1987. "Politisch-ökonomische Bestimmungsgründe der Vergabe von Entwicklungshilfe: Eine empirische Untersuchung für die Schweiz," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 123(IV), pages 501-529, December.
    4. Schneider, Andreas, 2019. "Deterrence Theory in Paraguay: Exploring Fraud and Violation of Trust Cases," MPRA Paper 102204, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Manuele Citi, 2015. "European Union budget politics: Explaining stability and change in spending allocations," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 260-280, June.
    6. A. Abigail Payne, 2003. "The Effects of Congressional Appropriation Committee Membership on the Distribution of Federal Research Funding to Universities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 325-345, April.
    7. Zhao, Jihong & Ren, Ling & Lovrich, Nicholas P., 2010. "Budgetary support for police services in U.S. municipalities: Comparing political culture, socioeconomic characteristics and incrementalism as rival explanations for budget share allocation to police," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 266-275, May.
    8. Benjamin Fordham, 1998. "Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy, and U.S. Uses of Force, 1949-1994," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(4), pages 418-439, August.
    9. Robert L Harlow, 1973. "On the Decline and Possible Fall of PPBS," Public Finance Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 85-106, April.
    10. Amanda A. Licht, 2010. "Coming into Money: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Leader Survival," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(1), pages 58-87, February.
    11. Hans Rattinger, 1975. "Armaments, Detente, and Bureaucracy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(4), pages 571-595, December.
    12. Min-Seok Pang & Ali Tafti & M. S. Krishnan, 2016. "Do CIO IT Budgets Explain Bigger or Smaller Governments? Theory and Evidence from U.S. State Governments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1020-1041, April.
    13. Ignacio Lago-Peñas & Santiago Lago-Peñas, "undated". "The Composition Of Public Spending And The Nationalization Of Party Systems In Western Europe," Working Papers 8-06 Classification-JEL :, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    14. Dukhong Kim, 2014. "Affect and Public Support for Military Action," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    15. Cusack, Thomas R., 1987. "Public expenditure decision making: A comparative analysis," Discussion Papers, various Research Units FGG dp 87-1, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Michael Don Ward & A. K. Mahajan, 1984. "Defense Expenditures, Security Threats, and Governmental Deficits," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(3), pages 382-419, September.
    17. Stephen H. Linder & B. Guy Peters, 1990. "An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policy-Making: The Role of Guidance Mechanisms in Policy Formulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(1), pages 59-83, January.
    18. Otto Davis & M. Dempster & Aaron Wildavsky, 1966. "On the process of budgeting: An empirical study of congressional appropriation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 63-132, December.
    19. Robert L. Harlow, 1973. "On the Decline and Possible Fall of Ppbs," Public Finance Review, , vol. 1(1), pages 85-105, January.
    20. Arvy Smith & Jason L. Jensen, 2017. "An Assessment of Factors Important to Legislators in Budget Decisions; How Much Impact Can Agencies Have?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 112-133, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:20:y:1976:i:2:p:213-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.