IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jinter/v8y1997i2p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Brian E. Dollery

    (Brian Dollery, Economics Department, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia. Tel: 61 67 73 3280. Email: bdollery@metz.une.edu.au)

  • Joe L. Wallis

    (Otago University, New Zealand)

Abstract

The economic rationale for government intervention in a market economy has traditionally been provided by the theory of market failure. This article reviews the market failure paradigm in the light of the more recent literature on government failure. One implication of the theory of government failure is that a contractualist approach to public service reform is the best method of improving public sector productivity. However, we argue that this view overlooks the potentially crucial role of leadership in public agencies and the ways in which transformational leadership can stimulate efficiency. We argue that communitarian conceptions of leadership can be incorporated into conventional economic approaches, and that this can have significant implications for public policy formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian E. Dollery & Joe L. Wallis, 1997. "Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 8(2), pages 113-126, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:113-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jie.sagepub.com/content/8/2/113.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Hackworth, 2003. "Public Housing and the Rescaling of Regulation in the USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(3), pages 531-549, March.
    2. Brian Dollery & Joe Wallis, 2004. "Economic Approaches to the Voluntary Sector: A Note on Voluntary Failure and Human Service Delivery," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 25-31, January.
    3. Dimitris P. SKALKOS, 2018. "Studying the political economy of reforms: The Greek case, 2010-2017," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(615), S), pages 163-186, Summer.
    4. Cacho, Oscar J. & Marshall, Graham R. & Milne, Mary, 2003. "Smallholder agroforestry projects: Potential for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation," ESA Working Papers 289093, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    5. Hosseini, S.S. & Hassanpour, E. & Sadeghian, S.Y., 2009. "An economic evaluation of Iranian public agricultural R&D policy: The case of sugarbeet," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1446-1452, November.
    6. Wallis, Joe & Dollery, Brian, 2001. "Government Failure, Social Capital and the Appropriateness of the New Zealand Model for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 245-263, February.
    7. Wallis, Joe, 2006. "Evaluating economic theories of NPOs: A survey, a case study and some new directions for socio-economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 959-979, December.
    8. María Alexandra Ortiz Cabrera, 2019. "Colección Enrique Low Murtra, Tomo XII. Derecho Económico," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1114.
    9. Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin, 2006. "Equity and Efficiency Tradeoffs in Water: Prospects for Choice Modelling," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 174097, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Grant, Bligh & Gow, Jeff & Dollery, Brian, 2011. "The Proposed 'Wine Restructuring Action Agenda' and Alternative Policy Options for the Australian Wine Industry," Papers 234288, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    11. Joe Wallis & Brian Dollery, 2003. "A Comparative Examination of Cultural Change Within the Australian and New Zealand Treasuries," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 27-38, July.
    12. Steele, Scott R., 2009. "Expanding the solution set: Organizational economics and agri-environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 398-405, December.
    13. Maxime Delabarre, 2021. "Corruption and Development," Working Papers hal-03114382, HAL.
    14. Bergner, Sören Martin & Bräutigam, Rainer & Evers, Maria Theresia & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The use of SME tax incentives in the European Union," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. Joe Wallis, 2006. "Coaching and the supply of hope:The Economics of commitment and a case study of supported employment services," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Joe Wallis & Syed Rizvi, 2023. "A New Institutional Economic Perspective on Alternative Governance Mechanisms at the Local Government Level," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 35(1), pages 108-127, January.
    17. Carolyn Cordery & Rachel Baskerville & Brenda Porter, 2010. "Control or collaboration?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(6), pages 793-813, August.
    18. Ellen Seidensticker & Glenn Jenkins, 2000. "Public Sector Intervention in the Energy Sector," Development Discussion Papers 2000-02, JDI Executive Programs.
    19. Doaa Salman & Dina Seiam, 2020. "The Lessons Learned From Thomas Cook Failure. Is It Brexit?," Economics & Law, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 2(2), pages 14-23.
    20. Michael Howlett, 2009. "Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 73-89, February.
    21. Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin & Pawsey, Nicholas, 2014. "Best practice pricing principles and the politics of water pricing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 92-97.
    22. Sungjun Kim & Changmu Jung, 2020. "The Influence of Urban Planning-Related Pledge Budget on Local Election Votes: A City Case in Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    23. Honfoga, Barthelemy G., 2015. "Revue De La Politique Sur Les Engrais Dans L’Espace Cedeao," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259020, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    24. repec:ags:aare05:139328 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.