IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v6y1981i2p107-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Larry V. Hedges

Abstract

Glass's estimator of effect size, the sample mean difference divided by the sample standard deviation, is studied in the context of an explicit statistical model. The exact distribution of Glass's estimator is obtained and the estimator is shown to have a small sample bias. The minimum variance unbiased estimator is obtained and shown to have uniformly smaller variance than Glass's (biased) estimator. Measurement error is shown to attenuate estimates of effect size and a correction is given. The effects of measurement invalidity are discussed. Expressions for weights that yield the most precise weighted estimate of effect size are also derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Larry V. Hedges, 1981. "Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:6:y:1981:i:2:p:107-128
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986006002107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986006002107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986006002107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Yuan & Roderick J. A. Little, 2009. "Meta-Analysis of Studies with Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 487-496, June.
    2. R. Philip Chalmers, 2018. "Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 696-732, September.
    3. Julio Cabero-Almenara & Julio Barroso-Osuna & Carmen Llorente-Cejudo & María del Mar Fernández Martínez, 2019. "Educational Uses of Augmented Reality (AR): Experiences in Educational Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Kluve, Jochen & Puerto, Olga Susana & Robalino, David A. & Romero, Jose M. & Rother, Friederike & Stöterau, Jonathan & Weidenkaff, Felix & Witte, Marc J., 2016. "Do Youth Employment Programs Improve Labor Market Outcomes? A Systematic Review," IZA Discussion Papers 10263, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Martin Bøg & Jens Dietrichson & Anna A. Isaksson, 2021. "A multi-sensory tutoring program for students at risk of reading difficulties: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(3), pages 233-251, April.
    6. Lindner, Thomas & Klein, Florian & Schmidt, Stefan, 2018. "The effect of internationalization on firm capital structure: A meta-analysis and exploration of institutional contingencies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1238-1249.
    7. Jonathan Quidt & Francesco Fallucchi & Felix Kölle & Daniele Nosenzo & Simone Quercia, 2017. "Bonus versus penalty: How robust are the effects of contract framing?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 174-182, December.
    8. Dana Rotz & Robert G. Wood, "undated". "Enhancing a Home Visiting Program to Address Repeat Adolescent Pregnancy: The Early Impacts of Steps to Success," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b0d2e2a087ed4bdc8aae9ffdf, Mathematica Policy Research.
    9. Brian Goesling & Robert G. Wood & Joanne Lee & Susan Zief, "undated". "Adapting an Evidence-Based Curriculum in a Rural Setting: The Early Impacts of Reducing the Risk in Kentucky," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c583f07a42ad49dbb1a236ffb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Marko Hofmann & Silja Meyer-Nieberg, 2018. "Time to dispense with the p-value in OR?," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 193-214, March.
    11. Wildgaard, Lorna, 2016. "A critical cluster analysis of 44 indicators of author-level performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1055-1078.
    12. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    13. Josef Frysak & Edward W. N. Bernroider & Konradin Maier, 2017. "An Effort Feedback Perspective on Persuasive Decision Aids for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 161-181, January.
    14. Kluve, Jochen & Puerto, Susana & Robalino, David & Romero, Jose M. & Rother, Friederike & Stöterau, Jonathan & Weidenkaff, Felix & Witte, Marc, 2019. "Do youth employment programs improve labor market outcomes? A quantitative review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 237-253.
    15. Daniel Stockemer & Rodrigo Praino, 2015. "Blinded by Beauty? Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Selection in the U.S. House of Representatives," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(2), pages 430-443, June.
    16. Brian Goesling & Joanne Lee & Robert G. Wood & Susan Zief, "undated". "Adapting an Evidence-Based Curriculum in a Rural Setting: The Longer-Term Impacts of Reducing the Risk in Kentucky," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9c41ee6178db492d9c2f3c344, Mathematica Policy Research.
    17. Doll, Monika, 2017. "Relative efficiency of confidence interval methods around effect sizes," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 22/2017, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:6:y:1981:i:2:p:107-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.