IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v41y2016i1p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of M2 Statistic to Evaluate the Fit of Cognitive Diagnostic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlou Liu

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Wei Tian

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Tao Xin

    (Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

The fit of cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) to response data needs to be evaluated, since CDMs might yield misleading results when they do not fit the data well. Limited-information statistic M 2 and the associated root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA 2 ) in item factor analysis were extended to evaluate the fit of CDMs. The findings suggested that the M 2 statistic has proper empirical Type I error rates and good statistical power, and it could be used as a general statistical tool. More importantly, we found that there was a strong linear relationship between mean marginal misclassification rates and RMSEA 2 when there was model–data misfit. The evidence demonstrated that .030 and .045 could be reasonable thresholds for excellent and good fit, respectively, under the saturated log-linear cognitive diagnosis model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlou Liu & Wei Tian & Tao Xin, 2016. "An Application of M2 Statistic to Evaluate the Fit of Cognitive Diagnostic Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(1), pages 3-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:41:y:2016:i:1:p:3-26
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998615621293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998615621293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998615621293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maydeu-Olivares, Albert & Joe, Harry, 2005. "Limited- and Full-Information Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit Testing in 2n Contingency Tables: A Unified Framework," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1009-1020, September.
    2. Mark Reiser, 1996. "Analysis of residuals for the multionmial item response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 509-528, September.
    3. Robert Mislevy, 1986. "Bayes modal estimation in item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 177-195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jianmin & Bentler, Peter M., 2013. "Limited information estimation in binary factor analysis: A review and extension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 392-403.
    2. Nuo Xi & Michael W. Browne, 2014. "Contributions to the Underlying Bivariate Normal Method for Factor Analyzing Ordinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 583-611, December.
    3. Mark Reiser & Silvia Cagnone & Junfei Zhu, 2023. "An Extended GFfit Statistic Defined on Orthogonal Components of Pearson’s Chi-Square," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 208-240, March.
    4. Yang Liu & Ji Seung Yang & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2019. "Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 529-553, June.
    5. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    6. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    7. Li Cai, 2010. "High-dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis by A Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro Algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 33-57, March.
    8. Pere Ferrando, 2007. "A Pearson-Type-VII item response model for assessing person fluctuation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 25-41, March.
    9. Vitoratou, Silia & Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Moustaki, Irini, 2016. "Explaining the behavior of joint and marginal Monte Carlo estimators in latent variable models with independence assumptions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. C. Glas & Anna Dagohoy, 2007. "A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 159-180, June.
    11. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    12. Ping Chen & Chun Wang, 2016. "A New Online Calibration Method for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 674-701, September.
    13. Ick Hoon Jin & Minjeong Jeon, 2019. "A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 236-260, March.
    14. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    15. John Hsu & Tom Leonard & Kam-Wah Tsui, 1991. "Statistical inference for multiple choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 327-348, June.
    16. Kim, Sung-Ho & Choi, Hyemi & Lee, Sangjin, 2009. "Estimate-based goodness-of-fit test for large sparse multinomial distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1122-1131, February.
    17. Ping Chen, 2017. "A Comparative Study of Online Item Calibration Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(5), pages 559-590, October.
    18. Qian, Zhiguang & Shapiro, Alexander, 2006. "Simulation-based approach to estimation of latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1243-1259, November.
    19. Jonathan Templin & Laine Bradshaw, 2014. "Hierarchical Diagnostic Classification Models: A Family of Models for Estimating and Testing Attribute Hierarchies," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 317-339, April.
    20. Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:41:y:2016:i:1:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.