IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i4p1122-1131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimate-based goodness-of-fit test for large sparse multinomial distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Sung-Ho
  • Choi, Hyemi
  • Lee, Sangjin

Abstract

The Pearson's chi-squared statistic (X2) does not in general follow a chi-square distribution when it is used for goodness-of-fit testing for a multinomial distribution based on sparse contingency table data. We explore properties of [Zelterman, D., 1987. Goodness-of-fit tests for large sparse multinomial distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 (398), 624-629] D2 statistic and compare them with those of X2 and compare the power of goodness-of-fit test among the tests using D2, X2, and the statistic (Lr) which is proposed by [Maydeu-Olivares, A., Joe, H., 2005. Limited- and full-information estimation and goodness-of-fit testing in 2n contingency tables: A unified framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 (471), 1009-1020] when the given contingency table is very sparse. We show that the variance of D2 is not larger than the variance of X2 under null hypotheses where all the cell probabilities are positive, that the distribution of D2 becomes more skewed as the multinomial distribution becomes more asymmetric and sparse, and that, as for the Lr statistic, the power of the goodness-of-fit testing depends on the models which are selected for the testing. A simulation experiment strongly recommends to use both D2 and Lr for goodness-of-fit testing with large sparse contingency table data.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Sung-Ho & Choi, Hyemi & Lee, Sangjin, 2009. "Estimate-based goodness-of-fit test for large sparse multinomial distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1122-1131, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1122-1131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00481-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Rapallo, 2003. "Algebraic Markov Bases and MCMC for Two‐Way Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 30(2), pages 385-397, June.
    2. Peter W. F. Smith & Jonathan J. Forster & John W. McDonald, 1996. "Monte Carlo Exact Tests for Square Contingency Tables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(2), pages 309-321, March.
    3. Maydeu-Olivares, Albert & Joe, Harry, 2005. "Limited- and Full-Information Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit Testing in 2n Contingency Tables: A Unified Framework," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1009-1020, September.
    4. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dianliang Deng & Sudhir R. Paul, 2016. "Goodness of Fit of Product Multinomial Regression Models to Sparse Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 78-95, May.
    2. Jiménez-Gamero, M.D. & Pino-Mejías, R. & Alba-Fernández, V. & Moreno-Rebollo, J.L., 2011. "Minimum [phi]-divergence estimation in misspecified multinomial models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3365-3378, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    2. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    3. Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini & Zhang, H, 2020. "A note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Shaobo Jin & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2017. "Asymptotic Robustness Study of the Polychoric Correlation Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 67-85, March.
    5. Ick Hoon Jin & Minjeong Jeon, 2019. "A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 236-260, March.
    6. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    7. Salim Moussa, 2016. "A two-step item response theory procedure for a better measurement of marketing constructs," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-50, March.
    8. Fabio Rapallo, 2005. "Algebraic exact inference for rater agreement models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 14(1), pages 45-66, February.
    9. Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.
    10. Harry Joe & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2010. "A General Family of Limited Information Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Multinomial Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 393-419, September.
    11. Genest Christian & Puccetti Giovanni, 2018. "A Journey Beyond The Gaussian World: An interview with Harry Joe," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 288-297, December.
    12. Banerjee, Syagnik & Poddar, Amit, 2021. "Run-of-the-Mill or Avant Garde? Identifying restaurant category positioning and tastemakers from digital geo-location history," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 436-443.
    13. Nuo Xi & Michael W. Browne, 2014. "Contributions to the Underlying Bivariate Normal Method for Factor Analyzing Ordinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 583-611, December.
    14. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4243-4258.
    15. Mark Reiser & Silvia Cagnone & Junfei Zhu, 2023. "An Extended GFfit Statistic Defined on Orthogonal Components of Pearson’s Chi-Square," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 208-240, March.
    16. Silvia cagnone & Stefania Mignani, 2007. "Assessing the goodness of fit of a latent variable model for ordinal data," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 337-361.
    17. Yang Liu & Ji Seung Yang & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2019. "Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 529-553, June.
    18. Yunxiao Chen & Irini Moustaki & Haoran Zhang, 2020. "A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 996-1012, December.
    19. Molenaar, Dylan & Tuerlinckx, Francis & van der Maas, Han L. J., 2015. "Fitting Diffusion Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times Using the R Package diffIRT," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(i04).
    20. Prince Destiny Ugo, 2017. "Project Quality Management Performance: An Insight to Sustainable Development Initiatives in Oil and Gas Host Communities," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 76-88, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1122-1131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.