IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v15y2019i10p1550147719883131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community privacy estimation method based on key node method in space social Internet of Things

Author

Listed:
  • Guobin Chen
  • Tangsen Huang

Abstract

Based on the research of social network and the Internet of Things, a new research topic in the field of Internet of Things, Social Internet of Things is gradually formed. The SIoT applies the research results of SIoT from different aspects of the Internet of Things, and solves the specific problems in the research of Internet of Things, which brings new opportunities for the development of the Internet of Things. With the development of the Internet of Things technology, in the spatial social Internet of Things structure, user information includes sensitive attributes and non-sensitive attribute information. This information can be inferred from public user information to infer the information of the private user and even speculate on sensitive attributes. This article proposes an information speculation method based on the core users of spatial social networks, and estimates the non-core user information through the core user public information. First, the user’s spatial social network is divided into communities, and the core nodes of the community in the spatial social network are calculated by PageRank algorithm and the convergence of the algorithm is proved. Then, through the public information of the core nodes divided by the community in the space social network, the private information of relevant users to these core nodes can be speculated. Finally, by experimental analyzing the community structures of SIoT (Social Internet of Things) like Twitter, Sina Weibo, ER random networks, and NW small-world network, and making 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% information anonymous respectively in these four kinds of networks, we can analyze their clustering coefficient, Q-modularity and properties. Finally, the key node information of the four spatial social structures is speculated to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed method. Compared with the non-core speculation method, this method has advantages in speculative information integrity and time.

Suggested Citation

  • Guobin Chen & Tangsen Huang, 2019. "Community privacy estimation method based on key node method in space social Internet of Things," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(10), pages 15501477198, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:10:p:1550147719883131
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147719883131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147719883131
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147719883131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Wang & Shuo Yu & Teshome Megersa Bekele & Xiangjie Kong & Feng Xia, 2017. "Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 329-343, July.
    2. Shang, Ronghua & Bai, Jing & Jiao, Licheng & Jin, Chao, 2013. "Community detection based on modularity and an improved genetic algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(5), pages 1215-1231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Wei & Ren, Yan & Huang, Yong & Bu, Yi & Zhang, Yuehan, 2021. "Scientific collaboration and career stages: An ego-centric perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    2. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    3. Li, Wei & Huang, Ce & Wang, Miao & Chen, Xi, 2017. "Stepping community detection algorithm based on label propagation and similarity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 472(C), pages 145-155.
    4. Shang, Ronghua & Luo, Shuang & Zhang, Weitong & Stolkin, Rustam & Jiao, Licheng, 2016. "A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to find community structures based on affinity propagation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 453(C), pages 203-227.
    5. Li, Yafang & Jia, Caiyan & Li, Jianqiang & Wang, Xiaoyang & Yu, Jian, 2018. "Enhanced semi-supervised community detection with active node and link selection," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 219-232.
    6. Lipeng Fan & Yuefen Wang & Shengchun Ding & Binbin Qi, 2020. "Productivity trends and citation impact of different institutional collaboration patterns at the research units’ level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1179-1196, November.
    7. Shang, Ronghua & Liu, Huan & Jiao, Licheng, 2017. "Multi-objective clustering technique based on k-nodes update policy and similarity matrix for mining communities in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 486(C), pages 1-24.
    8. Song, Le & Ma, Yinghong, 2022. "Evaluating tacit knowledge diffusion with algebra matrix algorithm based social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    9. Bilal, Saoud & Abdelouahab, Moussaoui, 2017. "Evolutionary algorithm and modularity for detecting communities in networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 89-96.
    10. Chang, Ying-Han & Huang, Mu-Hsuan, 2023. "Analysis of factors affecting scientific migration move and distance by academic age, migrant type, and country: Migrant researchers in the field of business and management," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    11. Kong, Xiangjie & Mao, Mengyi & Jiang, Huizhen & Yu, Shuo & Wan, Liangtian, 2019. "How does collaboration affect researchers’ positions in co-authorship networks?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 887-900.
    12. Jacqueline Brown & Dakota Murray & Kyle Furlong & Emily Coco & Fabian Dablander, 2021. "A breeding pool of ideas: Analyzing interdisciplinary collaborations at the Complex Systems Summer School," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Li, Shudong & Jiang, Laiyuan & Wu, Xiaobo & Han, Weihong & Zhao, Dawei & Wang, Zhen, 2021. "A weighted network community detection algorithm based on deep learning," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
    14. Jiaying Liu & Tao Tang & Xiangjie Kong & Amr Tolba & Zafer AL-Makhadmeh & Feng Xia, 2018. "Understanding the advisor–advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 161-180, July.
    15. He, Zhipeng & Zhang, Shuguang & Hu, Jun & Dai, Fei, 2024. "An adaptive time series segmentation algorithm based on visibility graph and particle swarm optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 636(C).
    16. Wang, Wei & Ren, Jing & Alrashoud, Mubarak & Xia, Feng & Mao, Mengyi & Tolba, Amr, 2020. "Early-stage reciprocity in sustainable scientific collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    17. Fu, Yu-Hsiang & Huang, Chung-Yuan & Sun, Chuen-Tsai, 2016. "Using a two-phase evolutionary framework to select multiple network spreaders based on community structure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 840-853.
    18. Liang, Zhentao & Ba, Zhichao & Mao, Jin & Li, Gang, 2023. "Research complexity increases with scientists’ academic age: Evidence from library and information science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    19. Leila M Naeni & Hugh Craig & Regina Berretta & Pablo Moscato, 2016. "A Novel Clustering Methodology Based on Modularity Optimisation for Detecting Authorship Affinities in Shakespearean Era Plays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Wei Wang & Xiaomei Bai & Feng Xia & Teshome Megersa Bekele & Xiaoyan Su & Amr Tolba, 2017. "From triadic closure to conference closure: the role of academic conferences in promoting scientific collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 177-193, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:10:p:1550147719883131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.