IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v20y2017i4p360-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lazy thinking, lazy giving—or lazy research?

Author

Listed:
  • Maarten van der Eynden

    (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Norway)

  • Henrik Fliflet

    (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Norway)

  • Per Fredrik Ilsaas Pharo

    (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Norway)

  • Hege Ragnhildstveit

    (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Norway)

  • Snorre Tønset

    (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Norway)

Abstract

In 2007 it was announced that Norway would work to mitigate climate change through reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (commonly referred to as REDD+) as part of the development aid budget, and in 2008 “Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative†became operational. In a recently published article the argument is made that Norway’s international forest engagement has largely failed. In this response, we clarify how the article and critique is based on serious flaws in the assumptions used and analysis conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Maarten van der Eynden & Henrik Fliflet & Per Fredrik Ilsaas Pharo & Hege Ragnhildstveit & Snorre Tønset, 2017. "Lazy thinking, lazy giving—or lazy research?," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 360-363, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:360-363
    DOI: 10.1177/2233865917738906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2233865917738906
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2233865917738906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristine Hermanrud & Indra de Soysa, 2017. "Lazy thinking, lazy giving? Examining the effects of Norwegian aid on forests in developing countries," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 19-41, March.
    2. R. A. Houghton & Brett Byers & Alexander A. Nassikas, 2015. "A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1022-1023, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chloe Margaret Papier & Helen Mills Poulos & Alejandro Kusch, 2019. "Invasive species and carbon flux: the case of invasive beavers (Castor canadensis) in riparian Nothofagus forests of Tierra del Fuego, Chile," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 219-234, March.
    2. M.J. Mace & Claire L. Fyson & Michiel Schaeffer & William L. Hare, 2021. "Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 67-81, April.
    3. Bronson W Griscom & Peter W Ellis & Alessandro Baccini & Delon Marthinus & Jeffrey S Evans & Ruslandi, 2016. "Synthesizing Global and Local Datasets to Estimate Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Fluxes in Berau, Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Chad M. Baum & Sean Low, 2022. "Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-50, December.
    5. Qingqian He & Qing Meng & William Flatley & Yaqian He, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Agricultural Aid on Forests in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Causal Analysis Based on Remotely Sensed Data of Sierra Leone," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Federico E. Alice‐Guier & Frits Mohren & Pieter A. Zuidema, 2020. "The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 534-547, June.
    7. Guo, Jianxin & Zhu, Kaiwei & Cheng, Yonglong, 2024. "Deployment of clean energy technologies towards carbon neutrality under resource constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    8. Mehraj A. Sheikh & Munesh Kumar & N. P. Todaria & Jahangeer A. Bhat & Amit Kumar & Rajiv Pandey, 2021. "Contribution of Cedrus deodara forests for climate mitigation along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Becken, Susanne & Mackey, Brendan, 2017. "What role for offsetting aviation greenhouse gas emissions in a deep-cut carbon world?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 71-83.
    10. Silvina M. Manrique & Judith Franco, 2020. "Tree cover increase mitigation strategy: implications of the “replacement approach” in carbon storage of a subtropical ecosystem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1481-1508, December.
    11. Kate Dooley & Sivan Kartha, 2018. "Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 79-98, February.
    12. Mykola Gusti & Nicklas Forsell & Petr Havlik & Nikolay Khabarov & Florian Kraxner & Michael Obersteiner, 2019. "The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1123-1141, August.
    13. Nizar Ali & Muhammad Saad & Anwar Ali & Naveed Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmad Khan & Habib Ullah & Areeba Binte Imran, 2023. "Assessment of aboveground biomass and carbon stock of subtropical pine forest of Pakistan," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(7), pages 287-304.
    14. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn & Brent Sohngen, 2017. "Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 195-206, September.
    15. Keigo Akimoto & Fuminori Sano & Toshimasa Tomoda, 2018. "GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 °C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 839-852, August.
    16. Hoenow, Nils Christian & Kirk, Michael, 2021. "Does competitive scarcity affect the speed of resource extraction? A common-pool resource lab-in-the-field experiment on land use in northern Namibia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Indra de Soysa & Kristine Hermanrud, 2017. "Missing the forest for the trees! A reply to “Lazy thinking, lazy giving—or lazy research?â€," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 364-366, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:360-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.