A tale of two power transitions: Capabilities, satisfaction, and the will to power in the relations between the United Kingdom, the United States, and Imperial Germany
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1177/2233865916689510
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Woosang Kim & Scott Gates, 2015. "Power transition theory and the rise of China," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 219-226, September.
- Woosang Kim, 2015. "Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 251-265, September.
- Vesna Danilovic & Joe Clare, 2007. "Global Power Transitions and Regional Interests," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 289-304, July.
- Sang-Hwan Lee, 2015. "Global and regional orders in the 21st century in terms of multi-layered power transition theory: The cases of US–China and China–Japan relations," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 266-279, September.
- Carla Norrlof & Simon Reich, 2015. "American and Chinese leadership during the global financial crisis: Testing Kindleberger’s stabilization functions," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 227-250, September.
- Michelle Benson, 2007. "Status Quo Preferences and Disputes Short of War," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 271-288, July.
- Kyungkook Kang & Jacek Kugler, 2015. "Assessment of deterrence and missile defense in East Asia: A power transition perspective," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 280-296, September.
- Ronald L. Tammen, 2008. "The Organski Legacy: A Fifty-Year Research Program," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 314-332, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Bora Jeong & Hoon Lee, 2021. "US–China commercial rivalry, great war and middle powers," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 135-148, June.
- Herbst, Luisa & Konrad, Kai A. & Morath, Florian, 2017.
"Balance of power and the propensity of conflict,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 168-184.
- Luisa Herbst & Kai A. Konrad & Florian Morath, 2014. "Balance of power and the propensity of conflict," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2014-13_2, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
- Morath, Florian & Herbst, Luisa & Konrad, Kai A., 2015. "Balance of power and the propensity of conflict," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112837, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Khan, Haider, 2023. "War and Peace in East Asia: Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap with China as a Rising Power," MPRA Paper 117089, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Javier Vadell, 2019. "La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 29(2), pages 401-428, May-Augus.
- Victor Alexandre G. Teixeira, 2021. "The Hegemony’s Contest in the South China Sea," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
- Sandra Lavenex & Omar Serrano & Tim Büthe, 2021. "Power transitions and the rise of the regulatory state: Global market governance in flux," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 445-471, July.
- Wang, Ze & Gao, Xiangyun & Huang, Shupei & Sun, Qingru & Chen, Zhihua & Tang, Renwu & Di, Zengru, 2022. "Measuring systemic risk contribution of global stock markets: A dynamic tail risk network approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
- Charis Vlados, 2020. "The Dynamics of the Current Global Restructuring and Contemporary Framework of the US–China Trade War," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 12(1), pages 4-23, January.
More about this item
Keywords
Power transition theory; peace and conflict; Germany; United States; United Kingdom; historical international relations;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:20:y:2017:i:3:p:201-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.