IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v8y1983i1p59-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent Region-Subregion Econometric Models: A Comparison of Multiarea Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Alberta H. Charney

    (Division of Economic and Business Research, the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA)

  • Carol A. Taylor

    (Division of Economic and Business Research, the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA)

Abstract

Questions relating to the optimal structure of state-substate multiregional models are addressed by comparing four multiarea models estimated for Arizona and its subcomponent areas. The study arrives at three major findings on structural methodology. First, greater accuracy is achieved at both the state and substate levels when the areas are estimated by a separate single-area free-standing model. Second, the multiarea model structures which maximize accuracy at the state level also maximize sub-state area accuracy. Third, few trade-offs must be made between forecasting accuracy and capability for local impact simulation. Among the multi-area models, those with some "bottom-upness' in model structure are both superior in terms of theoretical correctness and ease of simulation for local impact simulation and most accurate for forecasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberta H. Charney & Carol A. Taylor, 1983. "Consistent Region-Subregion Econometric Models: A Comparison of Multiarea Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 59-74, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:8:y:1983:i:1:p:59-74
    DOI: 10.1177/016001768300800104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001768300800104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001768300800104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fromm, Gary & Klein, Lawrence R, 1973. "A Comparison of Eleven Econometric Models of the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 385-393, May.
    2. Taylor, Carol A., 1982. "Econometric modeling of urban and other substate areas : An analysis of alternative methodologies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 425-448, August.
    3. Courbis, Raymond, 1979. "The Regina Model : A regional-national model for French planning," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2-3), pages 117-139.
    4. Phoebus J. Dhrymes & E. Philip Howrey & Saul H. Hymans & Jan Kmenta & Edward E. Leamer & Richard E. Quandt & James B. Ramsey & Harold T. Shapiro & Victor Zarnowitz, 1972. "Criteria for Evaluation of Econometric Models," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 1, number 3, pages 291-324, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Harold T. Shapiro, 1973. "Is Verification Possible? The Evaluation of Large Econometric Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(2), pages 250-258.
    6. Glickman, Norman J., 1977. "Econometric Analysis of Regional Systems," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780122865503 edited by Mills, Edwin S..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blommestein, H.J. & Nijkamp, P., 1983. "Testing the spatial scale and the dynamic structure in regional models : a contribution to spatial econometric specification analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luc Anselin, 1988. "Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 279-316, December.
    2. Calzolari, Giorgio & Corsi, Paolo, 1977. "Stochastic simulation as a validation tool for econometric models," MPRA Paper 21226, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sergio J. Rey, 1998. "The Performance of Alternative Integration Strategies for Combining Regional Econometric and Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, April.
    4. Fernand Martin, 1991. "Measuring the Impact of Free Trade: Local Analysis versus Regional and National Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Paul M. Beaumont, 1983. "Wage Rate Specfication in Regional and Interregional Econometric Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 75-83, June.
    6. Bernard, Jean-Thomas & Idoudi, Nadhem & Khalaf, Lynda & Yelou, Clement, 2007. "Finite sample multivariate structural change tests with application to energy demand models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1219-1244, December.
    7. Hendry, David F. & Clements, Michael P., 2003. "Economic forecasting: some lessons from recent research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 301-329, March.
    8. Rangan Gupta & Alain Kabundi & Stephen Miller & Josine Uwilingiye, 2014. "Using large data sets to forecast sectoral employment," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(2), pages 229-264, June.
    9. Jordi Galí & Mark Gertler, 2007. "Macroeconomic Modeling for Monetary Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(4), pages 25-46, Fall.
    10. JunHo Yeo & David Holland, 2004. "Economic Growth in Washington: An Examination of Migration Response and a Test of Model Accuracy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 27(2), pages 205-237, April.
    11. Konstantina Gkritza & Kumares Sinha & Samuel Labi & Fred Mannering, 2008. "Influence of highway construction projects on economic development: an empirical assessment," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(3), pages 545-563, September.
    12. Fullerton, Jr., Thomas M. & Taylor West, Carol A., 1998. "Regional Econometric Housing Start Forecast Accuracy in Florida," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 28(3), pages 15-42, Winter.
    13. P Gordon & J Ledent, 1980. "Modeling the Dynamics of a System of Metropolitan Areas: A Demoeconomic Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(2), pages 125-133, February.
    14. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    15. Robinson, Lindon J., 1981. "A New Development In The Marginal Productivity Theory Of Factor Demand," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279308, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Bryant, R.C. & Helliwell, J.F. & Hooper, P., 1989. "Domestic And Cross-Border Consequences Of U.S. Macroeconomic Policies," Papers 68, Brookings Institution - Working Papers.
    17. D Pepper & J Connell & A Charlesworth & M Bell & D Kay & G J D Hewings & T O'Riordan & J A Giggs & M Clarke & B J Garner, 1987. "Reviews: The Living Economy: A New Economics in the Making, Regional Development Policy: The Struggle for Rural Progress in Low-Income Nations, Order and Disorder in Early Modern England, Development ," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(7), pages 983-994, July.
    18. Maurizio Baussola, 2007. "Modelling a Regional Economic System: The Case of Lombardy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 19-38.
    19. B H Stevens & G I Treyz & J K Kindahl, 1981. "Conjoining an Input-Output Model and a Policy Analysis Model: A Case Study of the Regional Economic Effects of Expanding a Port Facility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(8), pages 1029-1038, August.
    20. Ann Markusen, 1995. "Growing Pains: Thoughts on Theory, Method, and Politics for a Regional Science of the Future," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 17(3), pages 319-326, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:8:y:1983:i:1:p:59-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.