IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v79y2023i4p476-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Rewards and Risks: India as Host of the 2023 G20 Summit

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew F. Cooper

    (Andrew F. Cooper is the University Research Chair, Department of Political Science, and Professor at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, University of Waterloo. From 2003 to 2010, he was Associate Director and Distinguished Fellow of the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). His books include BRICS VSI (OUP, 2016) and The Concertation Impulse in World Politics: Contestation over Fundamental Institutions and the Constrictions of Institutionalist International Relations (forthcoming, OUP).
    Note: This article was written prior to the September 2023 New Delhi G20: with the original submission on 15 July 2023 and a revised version sent on 28 August 2023.)

Abstract

India’s hosting of the 2023 G20 summit presents a number of serious tests. Taking on the presidency of the G20 offers India the prospect of enormous rewards related to an enhanced role in world politics. As this article lays out, however, the hosting function exposes India to risks of three types relating to organisational capacity and status. The highest profile of these risks comes from the changing external environment under which the New Delhi G20 will meet, set against a background of complicating geopolitical tensions. Moreover, beyond the highly charged stakes attached to this shifting external context, the basic organisational responsibilities of holding the presidency of the G20 in New Delhi present a second serious challenge. The hosting function comes with enormous logistical issues that are especially sensitive for India in terms of peer status. Hosting a global summit of this type—that is to say, an institution constructed without the cushion of legitimacy attached to formal international organisations—is also complicated by India’s self-identity. Performing the role of host conveys a message of India’s equality of peer status vis-à -vis the other structurally important members in the G20. Nonetheless, in playing up this (insider) side of India’s identity, the other side of India’s (outsider) identity that privileges India’s solidarity with the Global South and the privileging of aspirational multilateralism through the United Nations (UN) is potentially compromised. My article has two intertwined purposes. On the one hand, it examines the major tests that exist for India regarding the contextual, procedural, and institutional meaning dynamics of the G20, analysing the differentiated nature and implications of each of these challenges in turn. On the other hand, the article offers some insights concerning the techniques of how India has either addressed (or could address) the three tests and so ensure a positive reception for the summit process.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew F. Cooper, 2023. "Between Rewards and Risks: India as Host of the 2023 G20 Summit," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 79(4), pages 476-487, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:476-487
    DOI: 10.1177/09749284231203307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749284231203307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749284231203307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, Andrew F., 2016. "The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198723394.
    2. Andrew F. Cooper, 2021. "China, India and the pattern of G20/BRICS engagement: differentiated ambivalence between ‘rising’ power status and solidarity with the Global South," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 1945-1962, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory T. Chin, 2024. "Introduction – The evolution of New Development Bank (NDB): A decade plus in the making," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 368-382, May.
    2. Rajan Kumar, 2016. "Russia’s Foreign Policy," International Studies, , vol. 53(3-4), pages 210-226, July.
    3. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Sreeram Chaulia, 2021. "In Spite of the Spite: An Indian View of China and India in BRICS," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 519-523, September.
    5. Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "China's New Multilateral Institutions: A Framework and Research Agenda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 807-834.
    6. Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes, 2020. "Whither Security Cooperation in the BRICS? Between the Protection of Norms and Domestic Politics Dynamics," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 439-447, September.
    7. Stephen, Matthew D., 2020. "China's new multilateral institutions: A framework and research agenda," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2020-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Charles Roger & Sam Rowan, 2023. "The New Terrain of Global Governance: Mapping Membership in Informal International Organizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(6), pages 1248-1269, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G20; India; summitry; Global South; multilateralism; United Nations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:476-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.