IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v61y2024i3p293-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The making of a ‘narco-state’: Opium consumption, trade and regulations on the northeastern frontier of British India

Author

Listed:
  • Nabanita Sharma

    (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

Opium was one of the highly valued-commodities traded in the northeastern frontier of British India. This article argues that the introduction of opium in the region was in line with the British policy of introducing high-value commodities trade in the colonies. This policy helped extract raw materials and expand exchanges in new territories. Second, this policy of introducing cash crops was subtle. Opium was introduced as a cash crop decades before tea was ‘discovered’ in the region. The acreage remained low as compared to tea plantations. Opium’s value in terms of its revenue-generating capacity was the highest in comparison with tea and salt. Lastly, opium was disposed of through the state-run, monopolistic trade networks. Opium cultivation was discontinued in the British territories in Assam in 1860. All demands for poppy were subsequently met by importing opium from the rest of South Asia. The state-run and state-promoted tea and opium trades sustained the empire’s control over resources and lubricated the state machinery. Monopoly over the opium trade was crucial to control labour/resources and finance the Empire. The colonial regime built the ‘narco-state’ in the northeastern frontier to expand and sustain its trading interests. The exploration of the colonial policies and measures in this regard also interrogates the nature of political economy in the region in the period under study.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabanita Sharma, 2024. "The making of a ‘narco-state’: Opium consumption, trade and regulations on the northeastern frontier of British India," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 61(3), pages 293-324, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:61:y:2024:i:3:p:293-324
    DOI: 10.1177/00194646241263938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00194646241263938
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00194646241263938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mill, John Stuart, 2015. "On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199670802 edited by Philp, Mark & Rosen, Frederick.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Mercier & Ghislain Deslandes, 2020. "Formal and Informal Benevolence in a Profit-Oriented Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 125-143, August.
    2. Mills, Stuart, 2024. "Being good and doing good in behavioral policymaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126299, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Cyril Hédoin, 2024. "Public reason, democracy, and the ideal two-tier social choice model of politics," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 388-410, September.
    4. Daniel Guillery, 2020. "Domination and enforcement: The contingent and non-ideal relation between state and freedom," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(4), pages 403-423, November.
    5. Brian Kogelmann, 2023. "In defense of knavish constitutions," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 141-156, July.
    6. Harrison Frye, 2022. "Commons, Communes, and Freedom," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 21(2), pages 228-244, May.
    7. Rachel Myrick, 2024. "Public Reactions to Secret Negotiations in International Politics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(4), pages 703-729, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:61:y:2024:i:3:p:293-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.