IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v23y2022i1p119-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Learning-based Sentiment Analysis: Establishing Customer Dimension as the Lifeblood of Business Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sonali Agarwal

Abstract

‘First mover advantage does not go to the first company that launches, it goes to the first company that scales’ (Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, ScaleIt, 2016 ). M. Andreesen defines scale-up as a company that has identified its product/market fit and has reached notable proofs of market traction (e.g., profitability, revenues, active users, registered users, market demand). It has been previously established that five interdependent core dimensions can be used to evaluate scale-up: customer, product, team, business model and financials. Most of the business failures result from falling apart of one or more of these dimensions with others. We in our article discuss the ‘customer dimension’ as the essence of scaling up. For running a profitable business, it is crucial to evaluate customers’ reviews, like their perception and expectation from the product and services in terms of service quality, deliverables, staff and management practices and pricing. This will increase customer satisfaction which will further boost the demand and popularity of the brand and business. The customers today are very vocal in sharing their experiences through social media blogs, channels, review sites and so on. These experiences need to be decrypted by the management to understand the customer’s point of view, their apprehensions and expectations. Sentiment analysis is one of the best ways to tap customer feedback. The usual way of analysis involves the bag of words model using ngrams. A more refined version is an ontology-based analysis. Research has also been done using the radial basis function kernel for support vector machines (SVMs) (for recognizing polarity of sentiments). Naïve Bayes algorithms have also been used in some sentiment studies along with linear kernel SVM classifiers. But we realized during the literature review that it is not enough to just classify the text into positive and negative or a few more categories. It is even more important to know which topics are being discussed by the customers, their intention behind the message and further the need to classify them as complaints, suggestions, appreciation or query and so on. Thus, we in our article discuss the solution to all these types of analyses using ‘deep sentiment analysis’. We discuss the case of a few current social topics and introduce ‘recurrent neural networks’ (RNNs) and ‘convolutional neural networks’ (CNNs) for sentiment and intent analysis. These advanced analytical techniques will help in the ‘pivoting’ of businesses by taking desired actions such as improving product quality, improving quality of services and increasing quality checks in areas with maximum negative reviews. This eventually will help start-up ventures in improving customer experience and gradually help in the scaling of ventures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonali Agarwal, 2022. "Deep Learning-based Sentiment Analysis: Establishing Customer Dimension as the Lifeblood of Business Management," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(1), pages 119-136, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:119-136
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150919845160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150919845160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150919845160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    2. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    3. Bertrand Jayles & Clément Sire & Ralf H J M Kurvers, 2021. "Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Jalees, Tariq & Tariq, Huma & Zaman, Syed Imran & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain, 2015. "Social Media in Virtual Marketing," MPRA Paper 69868, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Apr 2015.
    5. Langley, David J. & Hoeve, Maarten C. & Ortt, J. Roland & Pals, Nico & van der Vecht, Bob, 2014. "Patterns of Herding and their Occurrence in an Online Setting," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-25.
    6. Ines Küster & Asuncion Hernández, 2012. "Brand impact on purchase intention. An approach in social networks channel," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-9.
    7. Aleksandar Bradic, 2012. "The Role of Social Feedback in Financing of Technology Ventures," Papers 1301.2196, arXiv.org.
    8. Lashgari, Maryam, 2014. "Social Media Technology Deployment in B2B: A Case Study," INDEK Working Paper Series 2014/9, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management.
    9. Xuzhen Zhu & Jinming Ma & Xin Su & Hui Tian & Wei Wang & Shimin Cai, 2019. "Information Spreading on Weighted Multiplex Social Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, November.
    10. Li, Xin & Xie, Qianqian & Jiang, Jiaojiao & Zhou, Yuan & Huang, Lucheng, 2019. "Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 687-705.
    11. Moro, Sérgio & Rita, Paulo & Vala, Bernardo, 2016. "Predicting social media performance metrics and evaluation of the impact on brand building: A data mining approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3341-3351.
    12. Kim Holmberg & Mike Thelwall, 2014. "Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1027-1042, November.
    13. Shu-Hsun Ho & Yu-Ling Lin & Robert Carlson Patrick, 2015. "Participant Motivations In A Social Media Community Page," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(4), pages 67-75.
    14. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Yang Xiao & Beiqun Li & Zaiwu Gong, 2018. "Real-time identification of urban rainstorm waterlogging disasters based on Weibo big data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 833-842, November.
    16. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    17. Charitha Harshani Perera & Rajkishore Nayak & Long Thang Van Nguyen, 2019. "Role of social word-of-mouth on emotional brand attachment and brand choice intention: A study on private educational institutes in Vietnam," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 8611115, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    18. Geoffrey Barbier & Reza Zafarani & Huiji Gao & Gabriel Fung & Huan Liu, 2012. "Maximizing benefits from crowdsourced data," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 257-279, September.
    19. I Made Wijaya Kusuma & I Gusti Ayu Wimba & Putu Yudy Wijaya, 2022. "The role of brand image and brand trust through electronic word of mouth in creating parent’s interest to sending children to school," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 35(1), pages 477-489, September.
    20. Suddaby, Roy & Saxton, Gregory D. & Gunz, Sally, 2015. "Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:119-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.