IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v15y2014i3p597-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debate on De-industrialization Revisited: The Process of Decline of Traditional Flexible Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay K. Seth

    (Vijay K. Seth is a Professor in Strategy & General Management, International Management Institute, New Delhi 110016. E-mail: vkseth1950@yahoo.co.in)

Abstract

In the present article, an attempt has been made to revisit the debate on de-industrialization. The premise, which has been used by the author, is based on an historical fact regarding the organizational structure of production and distribution of handicrafts. The organization of production, which had provided competitive advantage to the Indian manufacturing to become one of the largest suppliers of manufactured goods, had emerged as a consequence of nexus between merchants and craftsmen. The organizational structure that emerged due to their nexus has been defined here as ‘Traditional Flexible Manufacturing’. It has been argued in this article that as long as the nexus between merchants and craftsmen continued to exist, Indian manufacturing had capability to produce abundant quantity of quality handicrafts to satisfy the demands of mass markets. The moment their nexus was broken Indian manufacturing experienced de-industrialization. The nexus, which enjoyed its peak during the Mughal Empire, was broken by the political ascendency of the East Indian Company.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijay K. Seth, 2014. "Debate on De-industrialization Revisited: The Process of Decline of Traditional Flexible Manufacturing," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(3), pages 597-610, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:3:p:597-610
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150914537932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150914537932
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150914537932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Clingingsmith & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2004. "India's De-Industrialization Under British Rule: New Ideas, New Evidence," NBER Working Papers 10586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ogilvie,Sheilagh & Cerman,Markus (ed.), 1996. "European Proto-Industrialization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521497381, October.
    3. Mendels, Franklin F., 1972. "Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 241-261, March.
    4. Roy,Tirthankar, 2007. "Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521033053, October.
    5. Tilly, Richard & Tilly, Charles, 1971. "Agenda for European Economic History in the 1970s," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 184-198, March.
    6. Ogilvie,Sheilagh & Cerman,Markus (ed.), 1996. "European Proto-Industrialization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521497602, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Broadberry Stephen & Fremdling Rainer & Solar Peter M., 2008. "European Industry 1700-1870," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 49(2), pages 141-172, December.
    2. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Aubert, Francis & Gaigné, Carl, 2005. "Histoire de la dynamique territoriale de l’industrie. Le rôle de la demande de travail," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 76.
    4. Ogilvie, S. & Küpker, M. & Maegraith, J., 2009. "Community Characteristics and Demographic Development: Three Württemberg Communities, 1558 - 1914," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0910, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Alexander Donges & Jean-Marie Meier & Rui C. Silva, 2023. "The Impact of Institutions on Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 1951-1974, April.
    6. Jeremy Edwards, 2017. "Did Protestantism Promote Economic Prosperity via Higher Human Capital?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6646, CESifo.
    7. Edwards, Jeremy, 2018. "A replication of "Education and catch-up in the industrial revolution" (American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2011)," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-33.
    8. Vijay K. Seth, 2017. "Tale of Two Cities of South Asia: Consequences of Changes in the nature of Manufacturing on Dhaka and Kolkata," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1613-1633, December.
    9. Schaff, Felix, 2020. "When ‘the state made war’, what happened to economic inequality? Evidence from preindustrial Germany (c.1400-1800)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107046, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Schaff, Felix, 2020. "When ‘the state made war’, what happened to economic inequality? Evidence from preindustrial Germany (c.1400-1800)," Economic History Working Papers 107046, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    11. Promberger, Markus, 2021. "A Short History of Flexible Hours - Historical Baselines of Working Time Policy in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 202117, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    12. Thomas Baudin & Robert Stelter, 2022. "The rural exodus and the rise of Europe," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 365-414, September.
    13. Mikołaj Szołtysek & Siegfried Gruber & Rembrandt D. Scholz & Barbara Zuber Goldstein, 2009. "Social change and family change in a Central European urban context: Rostock 1819-1867," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-039, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    14. Yuling Ma & Jiajun Qiao & Dong Han, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Evolution of Specialized Villages Agglomeration Based on System Dynamics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Tirthankar Roy, 2012. "Consumption Of Cotton Cloth In India, 1795–1940," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(1), pages 61-84, March.
    16. Broadberry, Stephen & Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2017. "Anonymity, efficiency wages and technological progress," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 379-394.
    17. Broadberry, Stephen & Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2011. "Is Anonymity the Missing Link Between Commercial and Industrial Revolution?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 974, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    18. Broadberry Stephen, 2012. "Recent Developments in the Theory of Very Long Run Growth: A Historical Appraisal," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 53(1), pages 277-306, May.
    19. Gadre, Animesh, 2021. "Deindustrialisation and the Drain Theory: The Contours of Economic Degradation in British India," MPRA Paper 108977, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Parente, Stephen & Desmet, Klaus, 2009. "The Evolution of Markets and the Revolution of Industry: A Quantitative Model of England's Development, 1300-2000," CEPR Discussion Papers 7290, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    21. Karuna Dietrich Wielenga, 2015. "The geography of weaving in early nineteenth-century south India," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 52(2), pages 147-184, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:3:p:597-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.