IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fortra/v57y2022i1p66-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productive Contribution of Public Spending and Human Capital in Developing Countries Revisited: The Role of Trade Openness

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Dinh Su
  • Canh Phuc Nguyen

Abstract

This study examines the catalytic role of trade openness in the relationships between human capital and public spending and total factor productivity (TFP) growth in 44 developing countries over the 1980–2014 period. Applying various estimation techniques to deal with autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity and cross-section dependence, the study finds that (a) the effect of human capital on TFP is nonlinear, (b) government consumption positively affects TFP but military spending is a negative factor and (c) trade openness significantly improves the positive influences of these factors on TFP. The results imply the important role of trade liberalisation in productivity evolution in developing countries. JEL Codes: F43, H52, O47

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Dinh Su & Canh Phuc Nguyen, 2022. "Productive Contribution of Public Spending and Human Capital in Developing Countries Revisited: The Role of Trade Openness," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 57(1), pages 66-84, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:57:y:2022:i:1:p:66-84
    DOI: 10.1177/00157325211045471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00157325211045471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00157325211045471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tientao, A. & Legros, D. & Pichery, M.C., 2016. "Technology spillover and TFP growth: A spatial Durbin model," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 21-31.
    2. Sugata Ghosh & Andros Gregoriou, 2008. "The composition of government spending and growth: is current or capital spending better?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 484-516, July.
    3. Leamer, Edward E. & Levinsohn, James, 1995. "International trade theory: The evidence," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 26, pages 1339-1394, Elsevier.
    4. Francisco L. Rivera-Batiz & Luis A. Rivera-Batiz, 2018. "Democracy, Governance, and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Francisco L Rivera-Batiz & Luis A Rivera-Batiz (ed.), International Trade, Capital Flows and Economic Development, chapter 8, pages 215-248, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Hansson, Par & Henrekson, Magnus, 1994. "A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 81(3-4), pages 381-401, December.
    6. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    7. N. Gregory Mankiw & David Romer & David N. Weil, 1992. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 407-437.
    8. Mehraj Ahmad Sheikh & Mushtaq Ahmad Malik, 2021. "The Nexus of Trade Openness, Institutions and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation of BRICS Countries," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(2), pages 206-215, May.
    9. Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 1995. "What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 634-647, September.
    10. Paul Dunne & Eftychia Nikolaidou & Andre Roux, 2000. "Defence spending and economic growth in South Africa: A supply and demand model," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 573-585.
    11. Ortiz, Cristian & Alvarado, Rafael & Salinas, Aldo, 2019. "The effect of military spending on output: New evidence at the global and country group levels using panel data cointegration techniques," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 402-414.
    12. Edwards, Sebastian, 1998. "Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(447), pages 383-398, March.
    13. Christopher F Baum & Hans Lööf & Pardis Nabavi, 2019. "Innovation strategies, external knowledge and productivity growth," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 348-367, March.
    14. Kao, Chihwa, 1999. "Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 1-44, May.
    15. Joakim Westerlund, 2005. "New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 297-316.
    16. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    17. Ahsan, Humna & Haque, M. Emranul, 2017. "Threshold effects of human capital: Schooling and economic growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 48-52.
    18. Peter Batchelor & J. Paul Dunne & David Saal, 2000. "Military spending and economic growth in South Africa," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 553-571.
    19. Badri Narayan Rath & Purna Chandra Parida, 2014. "Did Openness and Human Capital Affect Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from the South Asian Region," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 6(2), pages 103-118, May.
    20. Peter Pedroni, 1999. "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 653-670, November.
    21. Giorgio d’Agostino & J. Paul Dunne & Marco Lorusso & Luca Pieroni, 2020. "Military Spending, Corruption, Persistence and Long Run Growth," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 423-433, June.
    22. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    23. Charles I. Jones & Paul M. Romer, 2010. "The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 224-245, January.
    24. Bresnahan, Lauren & Coxhead, Ian & Foltz, Jeremy & Mogues, Tewodaj, 2016. "Does Freer Trade Really Lead to Productivity Growth? Evidence from Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 18-29.
    25. Sohrab Abizadeh & Manish Pandey, 2009. "Trade Openness, Structural Change and Total Factor Productivity," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 545-559.
    26. Marie‐Ange Véganzonès & Carlos Winograd, 1998. "Human Capital, Trade Openness and Growth in Argentina in the 20th Century," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 12(2), pages 305-352, July.
    27. Harris, Richard D. F. & Tzavalis, Elias, 1999. "Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 201-226, August.
    28. Edward F. Blackburne III & Mark W. Frank, 2007. "Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(2), pages 197-208, June.
    29. Miller, Stephen M. & Upadhyay, Mukti P., 2000. "The effects of openness, trade orientation, and human capital on total factor productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 399-423, December.
    30. Na Hou & Bo Chen, 2013. "Military Expenditure And Economic Growth In Developing Countries: Evidence From System Gmm Estimates," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 183-193, June.
    31. Giorgio d'Agostino & Margherita Scarlato, 2019. "Knowledge externalities, innovation and growth in European countries: the role of institutions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 82-99, January.
    32. Papaioannou, Sotiris K., 2018. "EU services liberalization and TFP growth: Industry level evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 16-18.
    33. Helian Xu & Mingyong Lai & Peng Qi, 2008. "Openness, human capital and total factor productivity: evidence from China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 279-289.
    34. Zhang, Dongyang & Liu, Deqiang, 2017. "Determinants of the capital structure of Chinese non-listed enterprises: Is TFP efficient?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 179-202.
    35. Ibrahim Ngouhouo & Tii Njivukuh Nchofoung, 2021. "Does Trade Openness Affects Employment in Cameroon?," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(1), pages 105-116, February.
    36. Kadri Männasoo & Heili Hein & Raul Ruubel, 2018. "The contributions of human capital, R&D spending and convergence to total factor productivity growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1598-1611, December.
    37. Aligui Tientao & Diego Legros & Marie Claude Pichery, 2016. "Technology spillover and TFP growth: A spatial Durbin model," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 145, pages 21-31.
    38. repec:bla:obuest:v:61:y:1999:i:0:p:653-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    39. Russell W. Rumberger, 1987. "The Impact of Surplus Schooling on Productivity and Earnings," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 22(1), pages 24-50.
    40. Romero-Ávila, Diego & Strauch, Rolf, 2008. "Public finances and long-term growth in Europe: Evidence from a panel data analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 172-191, March.
    41. Mohammed Shuaibu, 2021. "Impact of Trade Openness and Climate Change on Food Productivity in Nigeria," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(2), pages 165-184, May.
    42. Su Dinh Thanh & Nguyen Phuc Canh, 2019. "Dynamics between government spending and economic growth in China: an analysis of productivity growth," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 189-212, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van, Huong Vu & Van Dao, Le & Hoang, Lich Khac & Van Hien, Ngo, 2023. "The efficiency of government finanical expenditures before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country investigation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Doğan, Buhari & Ghosh, Sudeshna & Shahzadi, Irum & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Nguyen, Canh Phuc, 2022. "The relevance of economic complexity and economic globalization as determinants of energy demand for different stages of development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 371-384.
    3. Pousseni Bakouan & Mahamadou Diarra & Idrissa M. Ouedraogo, 2024. "How Can Tariff Elimination and Trade Facilitation Affect East African Economies?," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 59(1), pages 117-145, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Christophe Schinckus & Thanh Dinh Su, 2020. "The drivers of economic complexity: International evidence from financial development and patents," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 164, pages 140-150.
    2. Dobdinga Cletus Fonchamnyo & Gildas Dohba Dinga & Vahsegmi Carolle Ngum, 2021. "Revisiting the nexus between domestic investment, foreign direct investment and external debt in SSA countries: PMG‐ARDL approach," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(3), pages 479-491, September.
    3. Le, Thai-Ha & Bui, Manh-Tien & Uddin, Gazi Salah, 2022. "Economic and social impacts of conflict: A cross-country analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2020. "A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Charalampos Agiropoulos & Michael L. Polemis & Michael Siopsis & Sotiris Karkalakos, 2022. "Revisiting the finance‐growth nexus: A socioeconomic approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 2762-2783, July.
    6. Wei Li & Tao Zhao & Yanan Wang & Fang Guo, 2017. "Investigating the learning effects of technological advancement on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(2), pages 1211-1227, September.
    7. Andriansyah Andriansyah & George Messinis, 2014. "Equity Markets and Economic Development: Does the Primary Market Matter?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 90, pages 127-141, June.
    8. Kabinet Kaba & Justin Yifu Lin & Mary‐Françoise Renard, 2022. "Structural change and trade openness in sub‐Saharan African countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 2101-2134, July.
    9. Isiaka Akande Raifu & Alarudeen Aminu, 2023. "The effect of military spending on economic growth in MENA: evidence from method of moments quantile regression," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Zhang, Chuanguo & Zhou, Xiangxue, 2016. "Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 943-951.
    11. Mihaela Onofrei & Ionel Bostan & Bogdan Narcis Firtescu & Angela Roman & Valentina Diana Rusu, 2022. "Public Debt and Economic Growth in EU Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Samargandi, Nahla & Fidrmuc, Jan & Ghosh, Sugata, 2015. "Is the Relationship Between Financial Development and Economic Growth Monotonic? Evidence from a Sample of Middle-Income Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 66-81.
    13. Aladejare, Samson Adeniyi, 2022. "Natural resource rents, globalisation and environmental degradation: New insight from 5 richest African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    14. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Inclusive Economic Growth: Relationship between Energy and Governance Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Thian-Hee Yiew & Chin-Yu Lee & Lin-Sea Lau, 2021. "Economic growth in selected G20 countries: How do different pollution emissions matter?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11451-11474, August.
    16. Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Ramos-Herrera, María del Carmen, 2023. "Does international trade promote economic growth? Europe, 19th and 20th centuries," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1358, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    17. António Afonso & Christophe Rault, 2010. "What do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnostic," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 731-755, January.
    18. Chris Belmert Milindi & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2023. "Impact of technological progress on carbon emissions in different country income groups," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1348-1382, August.
    19. Acikgoz, Senay & Ben Ali, Mohamed Sami, 2019. "Where does economic growth in the Middle Eastern and North African countries come from?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-183.
    20. Gharehgozli, Orkideh, 2021. "An empirical comparison between a regression framework and the Synthetic Control Method," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 70-81.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public spending; human capital; trade openness; total factor productivity; developing countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:57:y:2022:i:1:p:66-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.