IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v9y2020i1p15-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom Model: A Case Study from Oman

Author

Listed:
  • Bilal Ahmad Pandow
  • Nihan Kutahnecioglu Inan
  • Ananda S.

Abstract

The flipped learning approach over the years has gained importance, especially in higher educational establishments that primarily focus on more personalized learning for the students. In this context, the current study evaluates a flipped learning approach which was implemented by a higher education institution from the Middle East region as a pilot project and analyses the impact of the flipped approach on the student performance from the educators’ perspective. The study focuses on different aspects like the impact of the flipped approach on student performance in a different type of assessments, the impact of the flipped approach on academic performance, learning and development, and academic support activities. Also, this article analyses whether flipped learning reduces the plagiarism cases, impact on student attendance, student participation in extracurricular activities, impact on student’s knowledge, influence on student collaboration, effect on improvement in the ability to solve problems and impact of this approach on helping students to take the responsibility of their learning and become self-learners. This study empirically identified the learning outcomes from a flipped class and provides recommendations for the educators and higher education institutions for successful implementation of the flipped learning approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilal Ahmad Pandow & Nihan Kutahnecioglu Inan & Ananda S., 2020. "Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom Model: A Case Study from Oman," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 15-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:15-22
    DOI: 10.1177/2319714520909006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2319714520909006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2319714520909006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roach, Travis, 2014. "Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 74-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diletta Antenucci & Gioia Caldarelli, 2022. "Debt advice for consumers: nature, European debate and implications for Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 740, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Julen Izagirre-Olaizola & Jon Morandeira-Arca, 2020. "Business Management Teaching-Learning Processes in Times of Pandemic: Flipped Classroom at A Distance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    4. Grogan, Kelly A., 2017. "Will this be on the test? How exam structure affects perceptions of innovative assignments in a masters of science microeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    6. S. Cook & C. Elliott, 2016. "Innovations in Economics Education: An Introduction to Economic and Econometric Tools for Teaching and Learning," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1180038-118, December.
    7. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    8. Siti Zuraidah Md Osman & Rozinah Jamaludin & Wan Mustaffa Wan Yusoff & Nur Farrah Azwa Jasni, 2016. "FLIPPED: A Case Study in Fundamental of Accounting in Malaysian Polytechnic," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(1), pages 23-31.
    9. Rahman, Mohammad Mashiur & Kunwar, Samrat & Khatiwada, Niraj & Liu, Mengqi & Bohara, Alok & Wang, Jingjing, 2023. "Water and Economics: Why We Need and Ought to Teach Water Economics in the Modern Economics Curriculum," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(3), September.
    10. Alcalde, Pilar & Nagel, Juan, 2015. "Does active learning improve student performance? A randomized experiment in a Chilean university," MPRA Paper 68994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Gemma Abió & Manuela Alcáñiz & Marta Gómez-Puig & Gloria Rubert & Mónica Serrano & Alexandrina Stoyanova & Montserrat Vilalta-Bufí, 2016. "“Retaking a course in Economics: Innovative methodologies to simulate academic performance in large groups”," IREA Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2016.
    12. Nor Fathimah Fathil & Siti Zuraidah Md Osman & Rozinah Jamaludin, 2016. "An Analysis of Using Online Video Lecture on Learning Outcome: The Mediating Role of Student Interaction and Student Engagement," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(2), pages 57-64.
    13. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    15. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    16. Fritz Dresselhaus & Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "Assessing the impact of just-in-time methodology, in-lecture activities, and tutor-assisted post-lecture activities in the course experience of first year students in Economics at the University of Pr," Working Papers 562, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    17. Parrado-Martínez, Purificación & Sánchez-Andújar, Sonia, 2020. "Development of competences in postgraduate studies of finance: A project-based learning (PBL) case study," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    18. Hua-Xu Zhong & Po-Sheng Chiu & Chin-Feng Lai, 2021. "Effects of the Use of CDIO Engineering Design in a Flipped Programming Course on Flow Experience, Cognitive Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Jin Su Jeong & David González-Gómez, 2021. "Flipped-OCN Method in Mathematics Learning to Analyze the Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Olitsky, Neal H. & Cosgrove, Sarah B., 2016. "The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:15-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.