IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v13y2024i4p414-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has the Product Patent Regime Impacted Mergers and Acquisitions? Unveiling with a Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ashima Verma
  • Rachna Agrawal

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are one of the most practised inorganic strategies to multiply economic profits, acquire new product capabilities, expand markets, diversify risk and bring synergistic gains. The purpose of the study is to review the literature related to companies’ financial analysis, pre and post-M&A after the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005. The study follows a systematic literature review (SLR) process where 128 research publications from 2005–2020 are examined after applying the required review protocols. SLR found a deficient practical contribution of the limited literature on the three perspectives, namely, from accounting, productivity and managerial perspectives at the international level. Furthermore, there is also a dearth of studies from the three perspectives for the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry (IPI) post the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005. This review finds that there is a need for a unified approach for evaluating the success of M&A in IPI. Future studies can encourage research that ties these three perspectives to a common thread and furnishes a holistic approach for analysis. It will further bolster the research to provide practical insights to companies’ rooting for a robust financial analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashima Verma & Rachna Agrawal, 2024. "Has the Product Patent Regime Impacted Mergers and Acquisitions? Unveiling with a Systematic Literature Review," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 13(4), pages 414-427, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:414-427
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145211031314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145211031314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145211031314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:414-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.