IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v46y2022i3p235-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents of Perceived Service Quality of Online Education During a Pandemic: Configuration Analysis Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tanjim Istiaque Chowdhury
  • Md Rakibul Hoque
  • Peter Wanke
  • Mohammad Zahir Raihan
  • Md Abul Kalam Azad

Abstract

Background During COVID-19 lockdown worldwide, classroom education continues remotely through online. The question remains, comparing with the face-to-face education, does online education has a similar satisfaction level among the students? There are only a few studies that examine the perceived service quality of online education. Objective The study aims to analyze the factors of perceived service quality of online education during a pandemic. Research Design A structured questionnaire elicits information from 147 students from different study backgrounds of various universities worldwide. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is used for data analysis and model design. Research constructs evaluation for reliability and internal consistency are subsequently performed. A snowball random sampling method is applied for data collection. Results Findings from the fsQCA analysis identify four core factors that underpin student satisfaction through positive perceived service quality of online education. Alternative paths are determined based on gender, students’ current education status, and their loyalty toward online education. We also introduce two topologies of perceived quality regarding online education and student satisfaction. Originality Because of the primary nature of the data, this is firsthand experience gathered from different universities around the world who have willingly or unwillingly experienced online learning during the pandemic. The fsQCA technique for examining perceived service quality of online education. Conclusions The findings contain a number of contributions, illustrating different topologies of the student from different backgrounds and their intention, satisfaction and loyalty towards e-learning, and identifying causal factors that influence willingness to recommend online education.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanjim Istiaque Chowdhury & Md Rakibul Hoque & Peter Wanke & Mohammad Zahir Raihan & Md Abul Kalam Azad, 2022. "Antecedents of Perceived Service Quality of Online Education During a Pandemic: Configuration Analysis Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 46(3), pages 235-265, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:235-265
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X221084860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X221084860
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X221084860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Du Huynh, 2020. "Ho Chi Minh City," SpringerBriefs in Regional Science, in: Making Megacities in Asia, chapter 0, pages 87-112, Springer.
    2. Giao Ha Nam Khanh, 2017. "Customer satisfaction of Vietnam Airline domestic service quality," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Landon Kleis & Paul Chwelos & Ronald V. Ramirez & Iain Cockburn, 2012. "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 42-59, March.
    4. Kuo, Ying-Feng & Wu, Chi-Ming, 2012. "Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: Perspectives on perceived justice and emotions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 127-138.
    5. Ender Demir & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Gokhan Karabulut & Asli Cansin Doker, 2020. "The relationship between cryptocurrencies and COVID-19 pandemic," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(3), pages 349-360, September.
    6. Udo, Godwin J. & Bagchi, Kallol K. & Kirs, Peeter J., 2010. "An assessment of customers’ e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 481-492.
    7. El-Adly, Mohammed Ismail, 2019. "Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 322-332.
    8. Arch G. Woodside & Alexandre Schpektor & Xin Xia, 2013. "Triple Sense-Making of Findings from Marketing Experiments Using the Dominant Variable Based-Logic, Case-Based Logic, and Isomorphic Modeling," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 12(2), pages 131-153, December.
    9. Carroll, Noel & Conboy, Kieran, 2020. "Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    10. Vadivelu Tharanikaran & Sutha Sritharan & Vadivelu Thusyanthy, 2017. "Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in the Electronic Banking," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-67, March.
    11. Berry, Leonard L. & Parasuraman, A. & Zeithaml, Valarie A., 1988. "The service-quality puzzle," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 35-43.
    12. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    13. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faik Bilgili & Emrah Koçak & Sevda Kuşkaya, 2023. "Dynamics and Co-movements Between the COVID-19 Outbreak and the Stock Market in Latin American Countries: An Evaluation Based on the Wavelet-Partial Wavelet Coherence Model," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(4), pages 630-652, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Shan Lin, 2017. "Causal complexity for passengers’ intentions to re-ride," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1925-1937, September.
    2. Veríssimo, José Manuel Cristóvão, 2018. "Usage intensity of mobile medical apps: A tale of two methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 442-447.
    3. Chaouali, Walid & Hammami, Samiha Mjahed & Cristóvão Veríssimo, José Manuel & Harris, Lloyd C. & El-Manstrly, Dahlia & Woodside, Arch G., 2022. "Customers who misbehave: Identifying restaurant guests “acting out†via asymmetric case models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Grohs, Reinhard & Raies, Karine & Koll, Oliver & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2016. "One pie, many recipes: Alternative paths to high brand strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2244-2251.
    5. Yu-Li Lin & Hsiu-Wen Liu & Fengzeng Xu & Hao Wang, 2016. "Environmental Conditions, Entrepreneur Alertness and Social Capital on Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Ferguson, Graham & Megehee, Carol M. & Woodside, Arch G., 2017. "Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 218-233.
    7. Katarzyna Boratyńska, 2021. "A New Approach for Risk of Corporate Bankruptcy Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine & Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Al-Azab, Mahmoud Ramadan & Elbaz, Ahmed Mohamed, 2022. "The psychological drivers of entrepreneurial resilience in the tourism sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 702-712.
    10. Wang, Yi-Shun & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen, 2013. "What drives purchase intention in the context of online content services? The moderating role of ethical self-efficacy for online piracy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 199-208.
    11. Bigerna, Simona & D'Errico, Maria Chiara & Polinori, Paolo, 2022. "Understanding the green-growth: which pathways cities undertake in their climate programs," MPRA Paper 114156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Juan Pineiro-Chousa & Noelia Romero-Castro & Marcos Vizcaíno-González, 2019. "Inclusions in and Exclusions from the S&P 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, February.
    13. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    14. Paulssen, Marcel & Leischnig, Alexander & Ivens, Björn S. & Birk, Mattias M., 2016. "Relational norms in customer–company relationships: Net and configurational effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5866-5874.
    15. Foroudi, Pantea & Jin, Zhongqi & Gupta, Suraksha & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Mohammad Mahdi, 2016. "Influence of innovation capability and customer experience on reputation and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4882-4889.
    16. Andreea Apetrei & José Luis Sánchez-García & Juan Sapena, 2019. "The controversial link between entrepreneurial activity and inequality," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 485-502, June.
    17. Stephan M. Liozu & Sven Feurer & Andreas Hinterhuber & Arch Woodside, 2021. "Configurational theory and practices of firms employing multiple pricing policies: assessing effective and ineffective pricing recipes in multiple firm contexts," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 420-435, August.
    18. Boratyńska, Katarzyna, 2016. "FsQCA in corporate bankruptcy research. An innovative approach in food industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5529-5533.
    19. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Vasilache, Raluca Oana & Schin, George Cristian, 2020. "Exploring eco-label industry actors’ perceptions on the capabilities of a forthcoming multiple project management software – An fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 281-288.
    20. Korzynski, Pawel & Paniagua, Jordi, 2016. "Score a tweet and post a goal: Social media recipes for sports stars," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 185-192.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:235-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.