IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eurjou/v28y2022i4p405-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compensation policies and comparative capitalisms

Author

Listed:
  • Fátima Suleman
  • Henrique Duarte
  • Chris Brewster
  • Abdul Suleman

Abstract

A widespread rhetoric suggests that market-like rules dominate employment relationships, and particularly compensation, but empirical evidence is inconclusive. This research examines organisations’ compensation policies in clusters of European capitalist economies to test such a hypothesis. Four fuzzy clusters emerged from data, namely, Standard, Internalised, Competitive and Incentive, which illustrates a division between organisation- and market-based models. Collective pay rules characterise organisation-based model, and this is the predominant model in all countries except for the liberal market economies. Firms from different models of capitalism rely on internal labour market pay rules, suggesting that the scope of the liberal market system is narrow. Differences within clusters of capitalist economies suggest a role for agency and hidden labour market specificities in each grouping. The similarities of pay policies open room to identifying capitalist economies differently.

Suggested Citation

  • Fátima Suleman & Henrique Duarte & Chris Brewster & Abdul Suleman, 2022. "Compensation policies and comparative capitalisms," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(4), pages 405-425, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:405-425
    DOI: 10.1177/09596801211054364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09596801211054364
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09596801211054364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:405-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.