IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i5p958-975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial variance in the UK’s refugee politics and its consequences: Young Syrian refugees in England and Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth Mulvey
  • Dimitris Skleparis
  • Brian Boyle

Abstract

Access to social rights is crucial to refugee settlement and integration, and a whole range of social policy measures determine the limits on those rights. In the United Kingdom (UK) various relevant social policies are divided into devolved and reserved categories. This has resulted in a distinct territorial variance in social rights and welfare provisions within the country. The aim of this article is to explore how young Syrian refugees experience this territorial divergence in two jurisdictions: in Scotland, where they are part social citizens; and in England, where access to social rights is more limited. We use the prism of social citizenship as a means of examining the experiences of settlement and integration of Syrian refugees in the two nations. We draw out contrasts between these experiences and locate them within the interactions between the politics of welfare and refugee politics in the two nations. We argue that fine variances in England’s and Scotland’s social rights and welfare regimes have an impact on the settlement experiences of refugees. England’s less supportive regime fosters self-reliance and faster labour market integration among refugees. However, this environment pushes refugees in England to accept any job that they might find, no matter how precarious, or how far it may be from their educational qualifications, past professional experience or aspirations. This has overarching implications for refugees’ outlook on life and long-term planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth Mulvey & Dimitris Skleparis & Brian Boyle, 2023. "Territorial variance in the UK’s refugee politics and its consequences: Young Syrian refugees in England and Scotland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 958-975, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:5:p:958-975
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544231165440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544231165440
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544231165440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin R. Hamilton, 2015. "Gendered disparities in Mexico-U.S. migration by class, ethnicity, and geography," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(17), pages 533-542.
    2. Alice Bloch, 2004. "‘Labour Market Participation and Conditions of Employment: A Comparison of Minority Ethnic Groups and Refugees in Britain’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(2), pages 16-34, May.
    3. Michael Keating, 2005. "Policy convergence and divergence in Scotland under devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 453-463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo J Morelli & Paul T. Seaman, 2010. "Devolution as a Policy Crucible: The Case of Universal Free School Meals," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 139-161, January.
    2. Scott J. South & Soojin Han & Katherine Trent, 2022. "Imbalanced Sex Ratios and Violent Victimization in Mexico," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 843-864, June.
    3. Yvette Young, 2020. "“Making Do” in the Land of Opportunity—a Quantitative Exploration of the Economic Integration of Refugees in Utah," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 611-631, June.
    4. Jēkabsone Inga & Sloka Biruta, 2016. "Social Capital, Well-Being and Municipality: Salaspils Municipality (Latvia) Case," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 65-75, June.
    5. Jane Holgate & Anna Pollert & Janroj Keles & Leena Kumarappan, 2012. "Union Decline and Voice among Minority Ethnic Workers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 613-630, February.
    6. Nicolas Bacon & Peter Samuel, 2017. "Social partnership and political devolution in the National Health Service: emergence, operation and outcomes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(1), pages 123-141, February.
    7. Jenny Phillimore & Lisa Goodson, 2006. "Problem or Opportunity? Asylum Seekers, Refugees, Employment and Social Exclusion in Deprived Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1715-1736, September.
    8. Morelli, Carlo & Seaman, Paul, 2009. "Devolution & Entrenched Household Poverty: Is Scotland less mobile?," SIRE Discussion Papers 2009-06, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    9. Andy Inch, 2018. "‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1076-1092, April.
    10. Peter Matthews, 2013. "The return of place in Scottish social policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(1), pages 9-16, February.
    11. Erin Trouth Hofmann & E. Miranda Reiter, 2018. "Geographic Variation in Sex Ratios of the US Immigrant Population: Identifying Sources of Difference," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(3), pages 485-509, June.
    12. M.G. Lloyd, 2008. "Towards a ‘Pooled Sovereignty‘ in Community Planning in Scotland?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 58-68, February.
    13. Erin R. Hamilton & Maryann Bylander, 2021. "The Migration of Children from Mexico to the USA in the Early 2000s," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(3), pages 337-361, June.
    14. Giampaolo Garzarelli & Lyndal Keeton, 2016. "Policy Experimentation and Intergovernmental Grants in a Federal System," Working Papers 8/16, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:5:p:958-975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.