IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i7p1586-1605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Milligan

    (Georgia State University, USA)

  • Tyler McCreary

    (Florida State University, USA)

  • Na’Taki Osborne Jelks

Abstract

Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to predominantly Black communities and unjust flows of toxicants and sewage through urban creeks, streams, and rivers. We begin from critiques of the failure of institutionalized environmental justice and the state’s role in maintaining environmental racisms. To examine organizing responses to these circumstances, we analyze the improvisational politics of social movements in the context of the racial state, theoretically drawing from Charles Lee’s Ingenious Citizenship (2016). Empirically investigating the work of Atlanta community organizers, we emphasize pathways of strategic innovation among environmental justice organizers that improvise against the racial state even while negotiating with it. The article presents evidence of organizers challenging dominant modes of quantifying environmental injustice, appropriating and repurposing the language of environmental restoration, and improvising in the spaces of environmental governance. While state recognition has sought to contain or co-opt movements, we demonstrate the continuing vitality of mobilizations that simultaneously make demands of the state and rupture the governing forms of knowledge and practice that reinforce environmental racisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Milligan & Tyler McCreary & Na’Taki Osborne Jelks, 2021. "Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(7), pages 1586-1605, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:7:p:1586-1605
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544211038944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211038944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544211038944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kate Driscoll Derickson & Danny MacKinnon, 2015. "Toward an Interim Politics of Resourcefulness for the Anthropocene," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(2), pages 304-312, March.
    2. Kirk Jalbert & Abby Kinchy & Simona Perry, 2014. "Civil society research and Marcellus Shale natural gas development: results of a survey of volunteer water monitoring organizations," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 78-86, March.
    3. Kirk Jalbert & Abby Kinchy & Simona Perry, 2014. "Erratum to: Civil society research and Marcellus Shale natural gas development: results of a survey of volunteer water monitoring organizations," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 121-121, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abby Kinchy & Sarah Parks & Kirk Jalbert, 2016. "Fractured knowledge: Mapping the gaps in public and private water monitoring efforts in areas affected by shale gas development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 879-899, August.
    2. Ben Brucato, 2015. "The New Transparency: Police Violence in the Context of Ubiquitous Surveillance," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 39-55.
    3. Yasminah Beebeejaun, 2024. "Fracking and epistemic injustice: A feminist critique of knowledge formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 250-267, March.
    4. Verlinghieri, Ersilia, 2020. "Learning from the grassroots: A resourcefulness-based worldview for transport planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 364-377.
    5. Friederike Landau & Alexandra Toland, 2022. "Towards a sensory politics of the Anthropocene: Exploring activist-artistic approaches to politicizing air pollution," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(3), pages 629-647, May.
    6. Cousins, Joshua J., 2021. "Justice in nature-based solutions: Research and pathways," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Charles Barthold & Peter Bloom, 2020. "Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 671-681, July.
    8. Kate Driscoll Derickson, 2017. "Taking account of the ‘part of those that have no part’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 44-48, January.
    9. Rachel Slocum, 2018. "Climate Politics and Race in the Pacific Northwest," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:7:p:1586-1605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.