IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v38y2020i2p347-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What difference does democratic local governance make? Guggenheim museum initiatives in Abu Dhabi and Helsinki

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Ponzini

    (Politecnico di Milano, Italy)

  • Sampo Ruoppila

    (University of Turku, Finland)

  • Zachary M Jones

Abstract

Recent debates regarding urban policy mobilities have shed light on the transfer and adaptation of similar sets of measures and projects. However, limited attention has been given to the local decision-making processes and to how democratic or autocratic modes of governance affect the adaptation. This paper focuses on the transnational spreading of brand museums and cultural institutions as part of leisure-and-tourism-oriented urban regeneration strategies. The Guggenheim Foundation has been most active in this regard since the late 1990s with the Bilbao narrative de-contextualised and circulating internationally, luring new localities to establish the museum. The paper compares two fairly similar Guggenheim museum initiatives in situations differing radically in political and planning terms in Abu Dhabi, UAE and Helsinki, Finland – respectively, the capital of a sheikdom and the capital of a democratic country – asking what difference the mode of governance has made in the re-contextualisation of the projects. The comparison shows that the democratic governance generated a high degree of collective intelligence, involved multiple stakeholders and allowed critical evaluations beneficial in decreasing the risk-proneness, emphasising the site-specificity and bargaining for the city’s benefit. The authors call for a more nuanced understanding of the local governance within the re-contextualisation process of such initiatives and for further research regarding the transnational strategies of ‘auxiliary institutions’.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Ponzini & Sampo Ruoppila & Zachary M Jones, 2020. "What difference does democratic local governance make? Guggenheim museum initiatives in Abu Dhabi and Helsinki," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 347-365, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:347-365
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654419857096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654419857096
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654419857096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene McCann & Kevin Ward, 2015. "Thinking Through Dualisms in Urban Policy Mobilities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 828-830, July.
    2. Olds, Kris, 2002. "Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture, and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199256969.
    3. Davide Ponzini & Sampo Ruoppila, 2018. "Local politics and planning over transnational initiatives: the case of Guggenheim Helsinki," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 223-238, March.
    4. Cristina Temenos & Eugene McCann, 2012. "The Local Politics of Policy Mobility: Learning, Persuasion, and the Production of a Municipal Sustainability Fix," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1389-1406, June.
    5. Ian R. Cook, 2015. "Policy Mobilities and Interdisciplinary Engagement," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 835-837, July.
    6. Agatino Rizzo, 2017. "Why Knowledge Megaprojects Will Fail to Transform Gulf Countries in Post-Carbon Economies: The Case of Qatar," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 85-98, July.
    7. Tom Baker & Cristina Temenos, 2015. "Urban Policy Mobilities Research: Introduction to a Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 824-827, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aaron Malone, 2019. "(Im)mobile and (Un)successful? A policy mobilities approach to New Orleans’s residential security taxing districts," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 102-118, February.
    2. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    3. Cristina Temenos, 2024. "FROM BUDAPEST TO BRUSSELS: Discursive and Material Failure in Mobile Policy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 523-538, May.
    4. Enora Robin & Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2021. "Beyond the success/failure of travelling urban models: Exploring the politics of time and performance in Cape Town’s East City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1252-1273, September.
    5. Ruth Puttick, 2023. "The Influence Of Philanthropic Foundations On City Government Innovation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 774-791, September.
    6. Lachlan Barber, 2014. "(Re)Making Heritage Policy in Hong Kong: A Relational Politics of Global Knowledge and Local Innovation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1179-1195, May.
    7. Emma Colven, 2020. "Thinking beyond success and failure: Dutch water expertise and friction in postcolonial Jakarta," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 961-979, September.
    8. Tom Baker & Cristina Temenos, 2015. "Urban Policy Mobilities Research: Introduction to a Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 824-827, July.
    9. Cristina Temenos & Tom Baker, 2015. "Enriching Urban Policy Mobilities Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 841-843, July.
    10. Sergio Montero & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2022. "A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What ‘best practices’ leave behind," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1536-1555, June.
    11. Heather Lovell, 2017. "Are policy failures mobile? An investigation of the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Program in the State of Victoria, Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 314-331, February.
    12. Harsh Mittal & Arpit Shah, 2022. "Discursive politics and policy (im)mobility: Metro-TOD policies in India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 463-480, March.
    13. Frances Brill & Veronica Conte, 2020. "Understanding project mobility: The movement of King’s Cross to Brussels and Johannesburg," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(1), pages 79-96, February.
    14. Wood, Astrid, 2020. "Tracing the absence of bike-share in Johannesburg: A case of policy mobilities and non-adoption," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Napong Tao Rugkhapan, 2021. "Learn from elsewhere: A relational geography of policy learning in Bangkok’s Creative District," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1952-1973, November.
    16. Friederike Landau, 2021. "Agonistic failures: Following policy conflicts in Berlin’s urban cultural politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2531-2548, September.
    17. Colin Lorne, 2024. "Repoliticising national policy mobilities: Resisting the Americanization of universal healthcare," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 231-249, March.
    18. Gordon MacLeod, 2013. "New Urbanism/Smart Growth in the Scottish Highlands: Mobile Policies and Post-politics in Local Development Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2196-2221, August.
    19. Fry, Matthew & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Emergent patterns and processes in urban hydrocarbon governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 383-393.
    20. Thomas Borén & Patrycja Grzyś & Craig Young, 2021. "Spatializing authoritarian neoliberalism by way of cultural politics: City, nation and the European Union in Gdańsk’s politics of cultural policy formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1211-1230, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:347-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.