IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v33y2015i4p794-810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics, and the modulation of community action

Author

Listed:
  • Gavin Parker
  • Emma Street

Abstract

This paper builds upon literature examining the foreclosing of community interventions to show how a resident-led anti-road-noise campaign in South East England has been framed, managed, and modulated by authorities. We situate the case within wider debates considering dialogical politics. For advocates, this offers the potential for empowerment through nontraditional forums. Others view such trends, most recently expressed as part of the localism agenda , with suspicion. The paper brings together these literatures to analyse the points at which modulation occurs in the community planning process. We describe the types of countertactics residents deployed to deflect the modulation of their demands, and the events that led to the outcome. We find that community planning offers a space—albeit one that is tightly circumscribed—within which (select) groups can effect change. The paper argues that the detail of neighbourhood-scale actions warrant further attention, especially as governmental enthusiasm for dialogical modes of politics shows no sign of abating.

Suggested Citation

  • Gavin Parker & Emma Street, 2015. "Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics, and the modulation of community action," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 794-810, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:794-810
    DOI: 10.1068/c1363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1363
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Geddes, 2006. "Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 76-97, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janet Newman, 2014. "Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3290-3305, November.
    2. Mike Raco & Steven Henderson & Sophie Bowlby, 2008. "Changing Times, Changing Places: Urban Development and the Politics of Space–Time," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(11), pages 2652-2673, November.
    3. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    4. Brian W. Head, 2011. "Governance for sustainable regions: can government meet the innovation policy challenge?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 219-230, August.
    5. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2017. "Managerial Networking and Stakeholder Support in Public Service Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 237-254, June.
    6. Stephen Syrett & Marcello Bertotti, 2012. "Reconsidering Private Sector Engagement in Subnational Economic Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2310-2326, October.
    7. Alice Cohen, 2012. "Rescaling Environmental Governance: Watersheds as Boundary Objects at the Intersection of Science, Neoliberalism, and Participation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(9), pages 2207-2224, September.
    8. Ruth Puttick, 2023. "The Influence Of Philanthropic Foundations On City Government Innovation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 774-791, September.
    9. Barry Goodchild & Gilles Jeannot & Paul Hickman, 2010. "Professions, Occupational Roles and Skills in Urban Policy: A Reworking of the Debates in England and France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(12), pages 2555-2572, November.
    10. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    11. Brian W Head, 2014. "Evidence, Uncertainty, and Wicked Problems in Climate Change Decision Making in Australia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 663-679, August.
    12. Weimin Zhang & Wangrong Ma & Qiwei Chen, 2022. "Does Regional Development Policy Promote Industrial Structure Upgrading? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Katharine Willis & Ashita Gupta, 2023. "Place-Keeping in the Park: Testing a Living Lab Approach to Facilitate Nature Connectedness in Urban Greenspaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Ismael Blanco, 2013. "Analysing Urban Governance Networks: Bringing Regime Theory Back in," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 276-291, April.
    15. Beau Warbroek & Thomas Hoppe, 2017. "Modes of Governing and Policy of Local and Regional Governments Supporting Local Low-Carbon Energy Initiatives; Exploring the Cases of the Dutch Regions of Overijssel and Fryslân," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, January.
    16. Valeria Guarneros‐Meza & Mike Geddes, 2010. "Local Governance and Participation under Neoliberalism: Comparative Perspectives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 115-129, March.
    17. Marit Rosol, 2010. "Public Participation in Post‐Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 548-563, September.
    18. Vivien Lowndes & Sharon Squires, 2012. "Cuts, collaboration and creativity," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 401-408, November.
    19. Wendy Mendes, 2008. "Implementing Social and Environmental Policies in Cities: The Case of Food Policy in Vancouver, Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 942-967, December.
    20. Crispian Fuller, 2010. "Crisis and Institutional Change in Urban Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(5), pages 1121-1137, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:794-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.