IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v30y2012i1p147-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Area-Based Initiatives to Strategic Partnerships: Have We Lost the Meaning of Regeneration?

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Matthews

    (School of the Built Environment, Edwin Chadwick Building, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Scotland)

Abstract

For forty years area-based initiatives (ABIs) were the primary tool used by UK governments to tackle problems of concentrated deprivation and dereliction. The last decade saw these initiatives end, replaced by new forms of city-wide or region-wide governance: Local Strategic Partnerships in England and Community Planning Partnerships in Scotland. It was argued in both policy documents and policy analysis that this change would deliver more effective regeneration for all communities. Challenging this narrative, I present this policy shift as a change in the meaning of regeneration policy using the methodology of interpretive policy analysis. The evidence from Scottish experience suggests that for a key policy actor—community activists in deprived neighbourhoods—the approach of ABIs had a great deal of meaning as regeneration. Furthermore, this meaning was still present a decade after an ABI had ended. Meanwhile, the newer strategic partnerships were delivering little meaningful change. This difference in meaning is used to reimagine strategic regeneration as a more positive process.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Matthews, 2012. "From Area-Based Initiatives to Strategic Partnerships: Have We Lost the Meaning of Regeneration?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 147-161, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:1:p:147-161
    DOI: 10.1068/c1161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Taylor & Ivan Turok & Annette Hastings, 2001. "Competitive Bidding in Urban Regeneration: Stimulus or Disillusionment for the Losers?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(1), pages 45-63, February.
    2. John Edwards, 1997. "Urban Policy: The Victory of Form over Substance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 825-843, May.
    3. Karien Dekker & Ronald Van Kempen, 2004. "Large Housing Estates In Europe: Current Situation And Developments," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(5), pages 570-577, December.
    4. I Turok, 1992. "Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 361-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buregeya, Jean Marie & Loignon, Christine & Brousselle, Astrid, 2019. "Contribution to healthy places: Risks of equity free health impact assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 138-145.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Valler & David Betteley, 2001. "The Politics of 'Integrated' Local Policy in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2393-2413, December.
    2. Rob Atkinson, 2000. "Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 1037-1055, May.
    3. Claire Edwards, 2001. "Inclusion in Regeneration: A Place for Disabled People?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 267-286, February.
    4. N A Phelps, 1997. "A Hazard of New Fortunes: The Built Environment and Economic Development in Croydon," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(5), pages 643-645, October.
    5. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    6. Winifred Curran, 2004. "Gentrification and the Nature of Work: Exploring the Links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1243-1258, July.
    7. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Jana Temelová & Jakub Novák & Martin Ou rednícek & Petra Puldová, 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1811-1834, July.
    10. Chris Jensen-Butler, 1999. "Cities in Competition: Equity Issues," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 865-891, May.
    11. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    12. Alastair Adair & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2003. "Financing Property's Contribution to Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1065-1080, May.
    13. John Edwards, 1995. "Social Policy and the City: A Review of Recent Policy Developments and Literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 695-712, May.
    14. Laura Francis & Huw Thomas, 2006. "Evaluating Property-led Initiatives in Urban Regeneration: Tracing Vacancy Chains in Cardiff Bay," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(1), pages 49-64, February.
    15. S S Fainstein, 1994. "Government Programs for Commercial Redevelopment in Poor Neighborhoods: The Cases of Spitalfields in East London and Downtown Brooklyn, NY," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 215-234, February.
    16. Hugh Ward & Peter John, 2008. "A Spatial Model of Competitive Bidding for Government Grants: Why Efficiency Gains Are Limited," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-66, January.
    17. Edrissi, Ali & Poorzahedy, Hossain & Nassiri, Habibollah & Nourinejad, Mehdi, 2013. "A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 261-275.
    18. Peter Matthews & Christopher Poyner, 2019. "The experience of living in deprived neighbourhoods for LGBT+ people: Making home in difficult circumstances," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1499-1515, October.
    19. Peter Hall, 1997. "Regeneration Policies for Peripheral Housing Estates: Inward- and Outward-looking Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 873-890, May.
    20. Jasper Beekmans & Huub Ploegmakers & Karel Martens & Erwin van der Krabben, 2016. "Countering decline of industrial sites: Do local economic development policies target the neediest places?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3027-3047, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:1:p:147-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.