IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v25y2007i3p410-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inspecting for Improvement? Emerging Patterns of Public Service Regulation in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • James Downe
  • Steve Martin

Abstract

In recent years ministers in the UK have regarded external inspection as a key driver of improvement in public services and an important instrument of good governance. Detailed data analysis of the operation of Audit Commission inspection of English local authorities since April 2000 demonstrates significant variations in inspection scores in different types of authorities, in different years and in different services. These findings raise important questions about the consistency with which inspection criteria are being applied and the reliability of the evidence on which inspectors are basing their judgments about a council's capacity for improvement. This in turn casts doubt on the capacity of the current model of improvement to make service providers more accountable to the public, which central government claims to be one of its key policy objectives. The paper uses data from the shadowing of inspections in five local authorities and elite interviews to explore the practice of ‘inspecting for improvement’.

Suggested Citation

  • James Downe & Steve Martin, 2007. "Inspecting for Improvement? Emerging Patterns of Public Service Regulation in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(3), pages 410-422, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:3:p:410-422
    DOI: 10.1068/c59m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c59m
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c59m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Boyne & Gareth Enticott, 2004. "Are the 'Poor' Different? The Internal Characteristics of Local Authorities in the Five Comprehensive Performance Assessment Groups," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 11-18.
    2. Steve Martin, 2002. "The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 291-307, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Les Worrall & Kim Mather & Roger Seifert, 2010. "Solving the Labour Problem Among Professional Workers in the UK Public Sector: Organisation Change and Performance Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-137, June.
    2. Stephen Osborne & Kate McLaughlin, 2004. "The Cross-Cutting Review of the Voluntary Sector: Where Next for Local Government- Voluntary Sector Relationships?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 571-580.
    3. Demirel Demokaan, 2018. "Rethinking Performance Management Practices in Local Administrations? An Evaluation of BV, CPA, And WPI Practices in the United Kingdom," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 87-98, July.
    4. José Luis Zafra-Gómez & Antonio Manuel López-Hernández & Agustin Hernández-Bastida, 2009. "Developing an alert system for local governments in financial crisis," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 175-181, May.
    5. Abdalla Salih, 2014. "The Politics of BV: New Labour¡¯s Vision and the Policy Makers¡¯ Agenda," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 82-93, March.
    6. Joseph Drew & Brian Dollery, 2016. "A Factor Analytic Assessment of Financial Sustainability: The Case of New South Wales Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 132-140, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:3:p:410-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.