IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v19y2001i5p637-650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Claiming Legitimacy: Analysing Conflict in the Environmental Policy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Bhaskar Vira

    (Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England)

Abstract

The author presents a conceptual framework for the analysis of conflicting claims in the environmental policy context. It is suggested that claims can be analysed at three distinct levels: the social process of legitimisation and justification; the legal process of recognition and protection; and the political process of realisation. Outcomes depend in a complex and dynamic manner on the interaction of claims at each of these levels. An appreciation of these links may significantly enhance our understanding of the environmental policy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhaskar Vira, 2001. "Claiming Legitimacy: Analysing Conflict in the Environmental Policy Process," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(5), pages 637-650, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:637-650
    DOI: 10.1068/c7s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c7s
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c7s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, Richard A, 1993. "Holdouts, Externalities, and the Single Owner: One More Salute to Ronald Coase," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 553-586, April.
    2. Caporaso,James A. & Levine,David P., 1992. "Theories of Political Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521425780, October.
    3. Daniel W. Bromley, 1997. "Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims In A Dynamic World," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(4), pages 43-54, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Schubert, 2006. "Fairness in Urban Land Use: An Evolutionary Contribution to Law & Economics," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2005-22, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    2. Berrens, Robert P. & McKee, Michael & Farmer, Michael C., 1999. "Incorporating distributional considerations in the safe minimum standard approach: endangered species and local impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 461-474, September.
    3. Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2013. "Windfalls, wipeouts, and local economic development: A study of an emerging oil city in West Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(4), pages 429-443, June.
    4. Stavang, Endre, 1997. "Tolerance limits and temporal priority in environmental civil liability," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 553-574, December.
    5. Sean M. Collins & R. Mark Isaac, 2012. "Holdout: Existence, Information, and Contingent Contracting," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(4), pages 793-814.
    6. Kathleen Segerson, 1997. "Government Regulation And Compensation: Implications For Environmental Quality And Natural Resource Use," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(4), pages 28-31, October.
    7. Bromley, Daniel W., 2003. "Land-Use Policy as Volitional Pragmatism," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 9-17, April.
    8. Richard A. Epstein, 2021. "Rules and reasons, public and private on the use and limits of simple rules 25 years later," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 363-380, December.
    9. Gianpiero Torrisi, 2010. "Redistributive Policies And Recipients: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Academic Research in Economics, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Management Constanta, vol. 2(1 (May)), pages 109-124.
    10. Junaid Alam Memon & Gopal B. Thapa, 2015. "Explaining the de facto Open-access of Public Property Commons," PIDE-Working Papers 2015:114, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    11. John Marangos, 2005. "A Political Economy Approach to the Neoclassical Gradualist Model of Transition," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 263-293, April.
    12. Francesco Macheda & Roberto Nadalini, 2019. "The Danger of a “Geyser Disease” Effect: Structural Fragility of the Tourism-Led Recovery in Iceland," Working Papers 0038, ASTRIL - Associazione Studi e Ricerche Interdisciplinari sul Lavoro.
    13. Yu-Chih Lin & Feng-Tyan Lin, 2014. "A Strategic Analysis of Urban Renewal in Taipei City Using Game Theory," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(3), pages 472-492, June.
    14. Charan K. Bagga & Neil Bendle & June Cotte, 2019. "Object valuation and non-ownership possession: how renting and borrowing impact willingness-to-pay," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 97-117, January.
    15. Nitzan, Jonathan & Bichler, Shimshon, 1995. "Bringing Capital Accumulation Back In: The Weapondollar-Petrodollar Coalition – Military Contractors, Oil Companies and Middle-East "Energy Conflicts"," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 446-515.
    16. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2015. "The political economy of pollution markets: Historical lessons for modern energy and climate planners," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 943-953.
    17. Gill, Flora, 2000. "The meaning of work: Lessons from sociology, psychology, and political theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-743, June.
    18. Shi, Tian, 2006. "Simplifying complexity: Rationalising water entitlements in the Southern Connected River Murray System, Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 229-239, December.
    19. S E Hanson, 1998. "Development, Dependency, and Devolution: The Anomalous Political Economy of Communist and Postcommunist Societies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(3), pages 225-246, June.
    20. Error, Marta, 2017. "At the Sources of Agrarian Transformation in Reborn Poland," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 177(4), December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:637-650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.