IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v19y2001i2p249-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forests of Consumption: Postproductivism, Postmaterialism, and the Postindustrial Forest

Author

Listed:
  • A S Mather

    (Department of Geography, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 4LE, Scotland)

Abstract

Symptoms of postproductivism are more clearly developed in forestry than in agriculture, but they have attracted less attention. The ‘postindustrial’ forest, in which the emphasis placed on timber production is reduced relative to that placed on environmental services (such as biodiversity and recreation), epitomises the character of postproductive forestry. In many parts of the industrialised world, forests have essentially become places of consumption (of amenity, recreation, and wildlife observation) by a largely urban population, rather than places of production (of timber) for a largely urban population. Changing forestry and forest policy in Britain, mainland Europe, and North America are reviewed in the light of a trend towards postproductivism, and some of the causal factors underlying this trend are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • A S Mather, 2001. "Forests of Consumption: Postproductivism, Postmaterialism, and the Postindustrial Forest," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(2), pages 249-268, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:2:p:249-268
    DOI: 10.1068/c9914j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c9914j
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c9914j?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarke, Harold D. & Dutt, Nitish, 1991. "Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 905-920, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Sen & Wilson, Bill, 2007. "Pluralism in the economics of sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 743-750, April.
    2. Raum, Susanne, 2018. "Reasons for Adoption and Advocacy of the Ecosystem Services Concept in UK Forestry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 47-54.
    3. Terheggen, Anne, 2010. "The new kid in the forest: the impact of China's resource demand on Gabon's tropical timber value chain," MPRA Paper 37982, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Nijnik, Maria & Bizikova, Livia, 2008. "Responding to the Kyoto Protocol through forestry: A comparison of opportunities for several countries in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 257-269, February.
    5. Wang, Sen & Liu, Can & Wilson, Bill, 2007. "Is China in a later stage of a U-shaped forest resource curve? A re-examination of empirical evidence," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Ochieng, R.M. & Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. & Brockhaus, M. & Kowler, L.F. & Herold, M. & Arts, B., 2016. "Historical development of institutional arrangements for forest monitoring and REDD+ MRV in Peru: Discursive-institutionalist perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 52-59.
    7. Aurenhammer, Peter K., 2016. "Network analysis and actor-centred approach — A critical review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 30-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Rohrschneider, 1993. "Impact of Social Movements on European Party Systems," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 528(1), pages 157-170, July.
    2. Bruce Tranter, 2015. "The Impact of Political Context on the Measurement of Postmaterial Values," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    3. Raymond M. Duch & Kaare Strøm, 2004. "Liberty, Authority, and the New Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 233-262, July.
    4. Edward López & Carlos Ramírez, 2004. "Party Polarization and the Business Cycle in the United States," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 413-430, February.
    5. Ted Peterson & Kacey Tollefson, 2024. "A Scientific Discussion of Post-Materialism Values and Environmental Behavior," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Wilensky, Harold L., 2003. "Postindustrialism and postmaterialism? A critical view of the new economy, the information age, the high tech society and all that," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2003-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Mark D. Promislo & Robert A. Giacalone & John R. Deckop, 2017. "Assessing Three Models of Materialism–Postmaterialism and Their Relationship with Well-Being: A Theoretical Extension," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 531-541, July.
    8. Tobias Heinrich & Christopher Witko, 2021. "Technology‐Induced Job Loss and the Prioritization of Economic Problems in the Mass Public," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(2), pages 164-179, March.
    9. Martin Kroh, 2008. "The Preadult Origins of Post-Materialism: A Longitudinal Sibling Study," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 797, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Robert Giacalone & Carole Jurkiewicz & Stephen Knouse, 2012. "The Ethical Aftermath of a Values Revolution: Theoretical Bases of Change, Recalibration, and Principalization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 333-343, October.
    11. Martin Kroh, 2008. "The Preadult Origins of Post-Materialism: A Longitudinal Sibling Study," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 101, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:2:p:249-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.