IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v85y1991i03p905-920_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Clarke, Harold D.
  • Dutt, Nitish

Abstract

During the past two decades a four-item battery administered in biannual Euro-Barometer surveys has been used to measure changing value priorities in Western European countries. We provide evidence that the measure is seriously flawed. Pooled cross-sectional time series analyses for the 1976–86 period reveal that the Euro-Barometer postmaterialist-materialist value index and two of its components are very sensitive to short-term changes in economic conditions, and that the failure to include a statement about unemployment in the four-item values battery accounts for much of the apparent growth of postmaterialist values in several countries after 1980. The aggregate-level findings are buttressed by analyses of panel data from three countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarke, Harold D. & Dutt, Nitish, 1991. "Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 905-920, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:85:y:1991:i:03:p:905-920_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400179596/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark D. Promislo & Robert A. Giacalone & John R. Deckop, 2017. "Assessing Three Models of Materialism–Postmaterialism and Their Relationship with Well-Being: A Theoretical Extension," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 531-541, July.
    2. Robert Giacalone & Carole Jurkiewicz & Stephen Knouse, 2012. "The Ethical Aftermath of a Values Revolution: Theoretical Bases of Change, Recalibration, and Principalization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 333-343, October.
    3. A S Mather, 2001. "Forests of Consumption: Postproductivism, Postmaterialism, and the Postindustrial Forest," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(2), pages 249-268, April.
    4. Martin Kroh, 2008. "The Preadult Origins of Post-Materialism: A Longitudinal Sibling Study," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 101, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Martin Kroh, 2008. "The Preadult Origins of Post-Materialism: A Longitudinal Sibling Study," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 797, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Ted Peterson & Kacey Tollefson, 2024. "A Scientific Discussion of Post-Materialism Values and Environmental Behavior," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Wilensky, Harold L., 2003. "Postindustrialism and postmaterialism? A critical view of the new economy, the information age, the high tech society and all that," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2003-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Raymond M. Duch & Kaare Strøm, 2004. "Liberty, Authority, and the New Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 233-262, July.
    9. Bruce Tranter, 2015. "The Impact of Political Context on the Measurement of Postmaterial Values," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    10. Robert Rohrschneider, 1993. "Impact of Social Movements on European Party Systems," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 528(1), pages 157-170, July.
    11. Edward López & Carlos Ramírez, 2004. "Party Polarization and the Business Cycle in the United States," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 413-430, February.
    12. Tobias Heinrich & Christopher Witko, 2021. "Technology‐Induced Job Loss and the Prioritization of Economic Problems in the Mass Public," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(2), pages 164-179, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:85:y:1991:i:03:p:905-920_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.