IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i7p1531-1547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking urban scaling and socio-spatial inequalities in mobility: Evidence from England

Author

Listed:
  • Qi-Li Gao
  • Chen Zhong
  • Yikang Wang

Abstract

Prior research on the scaling of city size and inequality has a primary focus on economic factors such as income. Limited research has addressed socio-spatial disparities in mobility, involving physical activities and social interactions among individuals and population groups. Utilising mobile phone app data, this study measured inequalities using multiple mobility-related indicators (i.e. the number of activity points, the radius of gyration, self-containment, and social interaction indices) and related to population size by scaling models. In England’s context, these indicators unfolding mobility patterns and social issues display different scaling regimes, varying from sublinear to super-linear. It was observed that larger cities are associated with greater social interactions, particularly among socioeconomically advantaged groups; however, they also exhibit exacerbated self-segregation. Due to the radiation effect of big cities, the performances (e.g. travel radius) of small surrounding towns deviate from the predicted values of scaling models. Within cities, the evenness of indicators is independent of population size and produces distinct spatial patterns. The findings expand upon previous research and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between city size, urban inequality, and human mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi-Li Gao & Chen Zhong & Yikang Wang, 2024. "Unpacking urban scaling and socio-spatial inequalities in mobility: Evidence from England," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1531-1547, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1531-1547
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241234137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241234137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241234137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1531-1547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.