IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v43y2016i1p130-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connectivity and physical activity: using footpath networks to measure the walkability of built environments

Author

Listed:
  • Geraint Ellis
  • Ruth Hunter
  • Mark A Tully
  • Michael Donnelly
  • Luke Kelleher
  • Frank Kee

Abstract

There is now a strong body of research that suggests that the form of the built environment can influence levels of physical activity, leading to an increasing interest in incorporating health objectives into spatial planning and regeneration. There have been a number of strands to this research, one of which has sought to develop objective measurements of the built environment using geographic information systems involving measures of connectivity and proximity to compare the relative ‘walkability’of different neighbourhoods. The development of the ‘walkability index’ has become a popular indicator of the spatial distribution of those built environment features that are considered to have the greatest positive influence on levels of physical activity. The success of this measure is built on its ability to capture succinctly correlates of physical activity using routinely available spatial data, which includes using road centre lines to measure connectivity. In this paper we discuss two key aspects of the walkability index. First, as suggested by others, that the use of a footpath network, rather than road centre lines, may be far more effective in evaluating walkability. This may be particularly important for assessing changes in walkability arising from pedestrian-focused infrastructure projects, such as greenways. Second, we explore the implications of this for how connectivity can be measured. We take six different measures of connectivity and first analyse the relationships between them and then test their correlation with actual levels of physical activity of local residents in Belfast, Northern Ireland. We find that the best measurements appear to be intersection density and metric reach and use this finding to discuss the implications for developing tools that may better support decision-making in spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Geraint Ellis & Ruth Hunter & Mark A Tully & Michael Donnelly & Luke Kelleher & Frank Kee, 2016. "Connectivity and physical activity: using footpath networks to measure the walkability of built environments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(1), pages 130-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:1:p:130-151
    DOI: 10.1177/0265813515610672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265813515610672
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0265813515610672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerlinde Grasser & Delfien Dyck & Sylvia Titze & Willibald Stronegger, 2013. "Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 615-625, August.
    2. Paul Stangl, 2011. "The US Pedestrian Plan: Linking Practice and Research," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 289-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Margarita Larranaga & Julián Arellana & Luis Ignacio Rizzi & Orlando Strambi & Helena Beatriz Bettella Cybis, 2019. "Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study of Porto Alegre, Brazil," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2347-2379, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su Kye & Keeho Park, 2014. "Health-related determinants of happiness in Korean adults," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(5), pages 731-738, October.
    2. Kajosaari, Anna & Hasanzadeh, Kamyar & Kyttä, Marketta, 2019. "Residential dissonance and walking for transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 134-144.
    3. Duncan, Michael, 2023. "The influence of pedestrian plans on walk commuting in US municipalities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Maren Reyer & Stefan Fina & Stefan Siedentop & Wolfgang Schlicht, 2014. "Walkability is Only Part of the Story: Walking for Transportation in Stuttgart, Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Gang Feng, 2020. "Assessing the Rationality and Walkability of Campus Layouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Bettina Bringolf-Isler & Urs Mäder & Alain Dössegger & Heidi Hofmann & Jardena Puder & Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer & Susi Kriemler, 2015. "Regional differences of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Swiss children are not explained by socio-demographics or the built environment," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(3), pages 291-300, March.
    7. Xinxin Hao & Jilong Zhao & Qingtan Deng & Siyu Wang & Canyi Che & Yuxiang Chen, 2024. "The Influence of Morphological Elements of Urban Gated Communities on Road Network Connectivity: A Study of 120 Samples of the Central Districts of Jinan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Anne-Sophie Travert & Kristi Sidney Annerstedt & Meena Daivadanam, 2019. "Built Environment and Health Behaviors: Deconstructing the Black Box of Interactions—A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Boulange, Claire & Pettit, Chris & Gunn, Lucy Dubrelle & Giles-Corti, Billie & Badland, Hannah, 2018. "Improving planning analysis and decision making: The development and application of a Walkability Planning Support System," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 129-137.
    10. Arlie Adkins & Carrie Makarewicz & Michele Scanze & Maia Ingram & Gretchen Luhr, 2017. "Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 296-314, July.
    11. Sisitha Jayasinghe & Emily J. Flies & Robert Soward & Dave Kendal & Michelle Kilpatrick & Verity Cleland & Rebecca Roberts & Fadhillah Norzahari & Melanie Davern & Timothy P. Holloway & Sandra Murray , 2022. "Physical Activity and Food Environments in and around Schools: A Case Study in Regional North-West Tasmania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Eun Young Lee & Sugie Lee & Bo Youl Choi, 2018. "Association between objectively measured built environments and adult physical activity in Gyeonggi province, Korea," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(9), pages 1109-1121, December.
    13. Kwan, Soo Chen & Ismail, Rohaida & Ismail, Nor Halizam & Mohamed, Norlen, 2021. "An ecological study of the relationship between urban built environment and cardiovascular hospital admissions (2004–2016) in an Asian developing country," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Djihed Berkouk & Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir & Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo, 2020. "Examining the Associations between Oases Soundscape Components and Walking Speed: Correlation or Causation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Vanessa Tibola da ROCHA & Luciana Londero BRANDLI & Rosa Maria Locatelli KALIL & Amanda Lange SALVIA & Pedro Domingos Marques PRIETTO, 2019. "Quality Of Sidewalks In A Brazilian City: A Broad Vision," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 41-58, May.
    16. Carles Crosas & Eulàlia Gómez-Escoda & Enric Villavieja, 2024. "Interplay between Land Use Planning and Functional Mix Dimensions: An Assemblage Approach for Metropolitan Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Su, Shiliang & Zhou, Hao & Xu, Mengya & Ru, Hu & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2019. "Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-76.
    18. Stephen Glackin & Magnus Moglia & Peter Newton, 2022. "Working from Home as a Catalyst for Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Andres Sevtsuk & Rounaq Basu & Bahij Chancey, 2021. "We shape our buildings, but do they then shape us? A longitudinal analysis of pedestrian flows and development activity in Melbourne," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. João Paulo dos Anjos Souza Barbosa & Paulo Henrique Guerra & Crislaine de Oliveira Santos & Ana Paula de Oliveira Barbosa Nunes & Gavin Turrell & Alex Antonio Florindo, 2019. "Walkability, Overweight, and Obesity in Adults: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:1:p:130-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.