IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v36y2009i3p538-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Choice: A Matter of Utility or Regret?

Author

Listed:
  • Caspar G Chorus

    (Section of Transport Policy and Logistics Organisation, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 2628, Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Theo A Arentze
  • Harry J P Timmermans

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical comparison between utility-maximization and regret-minimization perspectives of spatial-choice behaviour. The key difference between these two perspectives is that the regret-minimization perspective implies that the anticipated satisfaction associated with a chosen spatial alternative depends on the anticipated performance of nonchosen alternatives. In order to provide a meaningful statistical comparison, we formulate a model of regret minimization such that it reduces to utility maximization for a given parameter restriction. Estimation results, based on a binary stated travel-mode-choice experiment, show how the regret-based model outperforms its utilitarian counterpart. Furthermore it is shown how participants in the experiment attached relatively much weight to the situation where the nonchosen alternative is slightly better than the chosen one, and they tend to discount larger differences. We show how this concavity of the regret function is in line with the prospect theoretical notion of risk-seeking behaviour in the domain of losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Caspar G Chorus & Theo A Arentze & Harry J P Timmermans, 2009. "Spatial Choice: A Matter of Utility or Regret?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(3), pages 538-551, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:36:y:2009:i:3:p:538-551
    DOI: 10.1068/b34092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b34092
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b34092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Hey & Chris Orme, 2018. "Investigating Generalizations Of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 3, pages 63-98, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Thierry Post & Haim Levy, 2005. "Does Risk Seeking Drive Stock Prices? A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Aggregate Investor Preferences and Beliefs," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 925-953.
    3. Pinkse, Joris & Slade, Margaret E., 1998. "Contracting in space: An application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 125-154, July.
    4. J. Jeffrey Inman & James S. Dyer & Jianmin Jia, 1997. "A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 97-111.
    5. Hensher, David A. & Rose, John M., 2007. "Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: A case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 428-443, June.
    6. Peter Nijkamp & Tommaso Tritapepe & Aura Reggiani, 1997. "Spatial choice behaviour: logit models and neural network analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 31(4), pages 411-429.
    7. Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "The use of crying over spilled milk : A note on the rationality and functionality of regret," Other publications TiSEM 66ac04be-d1ee-4a0e-9e97-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Bhat, Chandra R. & Guo, Jessica, 2004. "A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 147-168, February.
    9. Paul J. H. Schoemaker, 1990. "Are Risk-Attitudes Related Across Domains and Response Modes?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1451-1463, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi Han & Theo Arentze & Harry J P Timmermans, 2013. "Learning and Affective Responses in Location-Choice Dynamics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(1), pages 78-94, February.
    2. Boeri, Marco & Longo, Alberto & Grisolía, José M. & Hutchinson, W. George & Kee, Frank, 2013. "The role of regret minimisation in lifestyle choices affecting the risk of coronary heart disease," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 253-260.
    3. Caspar Chorus, 2011. "Random Regret Minimization: An Overview of Model Properties and Empirical Evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 75-92, July.
    4. Soora Rasouli & Harry J P Timmermans, 2014. "Uncertain Travel Times and Activity Schedules under Conditions of Space-Time Constraints and Invariant Choice Heuristics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(6), pages 1022-1030, December.
    5. Longo, Alberto & Boeri, Marco, 2014. "Information, Random Regret Minimisation, Random Utility Maximisation: Willingness to pay for Renewable Energy," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182670, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Isabelle Cadoret & Emma Galli & Fabio Padovano, 2021. "Environmental taxation: Pigouvian or Leviathan?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(1), pages 37-51, March.
    7. Sunghoon Jang & Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2018. "Accounting for cognitive effort in random regret-only models: Effect of attribute variation and choice set size," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(5), pages 842-863, September.
    8. Caspar G Chorus & John M Rose & David A Hensher, 2013. "Regret Minimization or Utility Maximization: It Depends on the Attribute," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(1), pages 154-169, February.
    9. Mara Thiene & Marco Boeri & Caspar Chorus, 2012. "Random Regret Minimization: Exploration of a New Choice Model for Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 413-429, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    2. Chandra Bhat & Ipek Sener, 2009. "A copula-based closed-form binary logit choice model for accommodating spatial correlation across observational units," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 243-272, September.
    3. Xiaokun Wang & Kara M. Kockelman, 2009. "Baysian Inference For Ordered Response Data With A Dynamic Spatial‐Ordered Probit Model," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 877-913, December.
    4. Deck, Cary & Lee, Jungmin & Reyes, Javier A. & Rosen, Christopher C., 2013. "A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-24.
    5. Peter Brooks & Simon Peters & Horst Zank, 2014. "Risk behavior for gain, loss, and mixed prospects," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 153-182, August.
    6. Georgalos, Konstantinos & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David A., 2021. "On the contribution of the Markowitz model of utility to explain risky choice in experimental research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 527-543.
    7. Mookherjee, Satadruta & Lee, Jennifer J. & Sung, Billy, 2021. "Multichannel presence, boon or curse?: A comparison in price, loyalty, regret, and disappointment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 429-440.
    8. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2428-2436.
    9. Kavitha Ranganathan, 2018. "Does Global Shapes Of Utility Functions Matter For Investment Decisions?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 341-361, October.
    10. Andreas Herrmann & Frank Huber & Christian Seilheimer, 2003. "Die Qual der Wahl: Die Bedeutung des Regret bei Kaufentscheidungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 224-249, May.
    11. Smirnov, Oleg A., 2010. "Modeling spatial discrete choice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 292-298, September.
    12. Manel Baucells & Antonio Villasís, 2010. "Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 193-211, February.
    13. Hone-Jay Chu & Chen-Fa Wu & Yu-Pin Lin, 2013. "Incorporating Spatial Autocorrelation with Neural Networks in Empirical Land-Use Change Models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(3), pages 384-404, June.
    14. Wei Lim & Joo Lee-Partridge & Soo Tan, 2008. "Revenue implication of auction value in k-price sealed-bid auctions: An experimental study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 25-38, March.
    15. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    16. Chorus, Caspar G. & Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2008. "A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Jianqiang Zhang & Krista J. Li, 2021. "Quality Disclosure Under Consumer Loss Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 5052-5069, August.
    18. Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Kockelman, Kara M. & Lemp, Jason D., 2012. "The dynamic spatial multinomial probit model: analysis of land use change using parcel-level data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 77-88.
    19. Keaveney, Susan M. & Huber, Frank & Herrmann, Andreas, 2007. "A model of buyer regret: Selected prepurchase and postpurchase antecedents with consequences for the brand and the channel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1207-1215, December.
    20. Giselle Moraes Ramos & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2014. "A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers' Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:36:y:2009:i:3:p:538-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.