IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v32y2005i2p281-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Advantage in Land-Use Allocation under Regionalism

Author

Listed:
  • Dean M Hanink
  • Robert G Cromley

Abstract

The Ricardian principle of comparative advantage is used frequently as a foundation for illustrating potential improvements in the allocation of production and trade flows among countries. Such improvements typically consist of increased economic efficiency in the form of lower aggregate production costs and greater welfare in the form of higher levels of aggregate output. The improvements are made possible by the effective integration of otherwise individual economies. This paper employs the principle of comparative advantage as the foundation for illustrating potential improvements in the allocation of land uses under a regional approach to land-use planning. It uses a generalized assignment problem within a geographical information system (GIS) to describe the efficiency benefits of integrating land-use plans among several districts.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean M Hanink & Robert G Cromley, 2005. "Comparative Advantage in Land-Use Allocation under Regionalism," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(2), pages 281-292, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:32:y:2005:i:2:p:281-292
    DOI: 10.1068/b31147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b31147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b31147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wright, Jeffrey & Revelle, Charles & Cohon, Jared, 1983. "A multiobjective integer programming model for the land acquisition problem," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 31-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhao Zhu & Jonah Susskind & Mario Giampieri & Hazel Backus O’Neil & Alan M. Berger, 2023. "Optimizing Sustainable Suburban Expansion with Autonomous Mobility through a Parametric Design Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Michael Johnson & David Turcotte & Felicia Sullivan, 2010. "What Foreclosed Homes Should a Municipality Purchase to Stabilize Vulnerable Neighborhoods?," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 363-388, September.
    3. Afsana Haque & Yasushi Asami, 2011. "Optimizing Urban Land-Use Allocation: Case Study of Dhanmondi Residential Area, Dhaka, Bangladesh," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 388-410, June.
    4. J T Diamond & J R Wright, 1988. "Design of an Integrated Spatial Information System for Multiobjective Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 15(2), pages 205-214, June.
    5. Önal, Hayri & Wang, Yicheng & Dissanayake, Sahan T.M. & Westervelt, James D., 2016. "Optimal design of compact and functionally contiguous conservation management areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 957-968.
    6. J C Williams & C S ReVelle, 1996. "A 0–1 Programming Approach to Delineating Protected Reserves," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 23(5), pages 607-624, October.
    7. Yaolin Liu & Jinjin Peng & Limin Jiao & Yanfang Liu, 2016. "PSOLA: A Heuristic Land-Use Allocation Model Using Patch-Level Operations and Knowledge-Informed Rules," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    8. George, John A. & Lamar, Bruce W. & Wallace, Chris A., 1997. "Political district determination using large-scale network optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 11-28, March.
    9. Gabriel, Steven A. & Faria, Jose A. & Moglen, Glenn E., 2006. "A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 212-248, September.
    10. Reza Taromi & Michael DuRoss & Bintong Chen & Ardeshir Faghri & Mingxin Li & Tracy DeLiberty, 2015. "A multiobjective land development optimization model: the case of New Castle County, Delaware," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 277-304, April.
    11. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali & Kevin Lunday, 2012. "The coastal seaspace patrol sector design and allocation problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 483-514, November.
    12. Hayri Önal & Robert A. Briers, 2006. "Optimal Selection of a Connected Reserve Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 379-388, April.
    13. Weerasena, Lakmali & Shier, Douglas & Tonkyn, David & McFeaters, Mark & Collins, Christopher, 2023. "A sequential approach to reserve design with compactness and contiguity considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    14. Timothy J. Niblett & Richard L. Church, 2016. "The Shortest Covering Path Problem," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 131-151, January.
    15. Liu, Xiaoping & Ou, Jinpei & Li, Xia & Ai, Bin, 2013. "Combining system dynamics and hybrid particle swarm optimization for land use allocation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 11-24.
    16. Chang, Ni-Bin & Wen, C.G. & Chen, Y.L., 1997. "A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for optimal management of the reservoir watershed," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 289-302, June.
    17. Justin C Williams, 2003. "Convex Land Acquisition with Zero-One Programming," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(2), pages 255-270, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:32:y:2005:i:2:p:281-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.