IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v9y1977i8p883-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to Airport Location

Author

Listed:
  • J Paelinck

    (Netherlands Economic Institute, 50 Burgemeester Oudlaan, NL-3016-Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

A multicriteria method, which can be based on purely qualitative information as to the elements of judgment and their relative weights and set up in a probabilistic way, is first presented briefly. Multicriteria selection is then applied to the problem of airport location, the elements of the relation being taken from Dutch studies on the second national airport. Results are compared with conclusions obtained in these studies, the outcome of the synthesis being a single probability table.

Suggested Citation

  • J Paelinck, 1977. "Qualitative Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to Airport Location," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(8), pages 883-895, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:9:y:1977:i:8:p:883-895
    DOI: 10.1068/a090883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a090883
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a090883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santos, Miguel Gueifão & Antunes, António Pais, 2015. "Long-term evolution of airport networks: Optimization model and its application to the United States," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 17-46.
    2. Chao Tian & Wen Yu Zhang & Shuai Zhang & Juan Juan Peng, 2019. "An Extended Single-Valued Neutrosophic Projection-Based Qualitative Flexible Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Edwin Hinloopen & Peter Nijkamp, 1990. "Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 37-56, February.
    4. Zhenyu Zhang & Jie Lin & Huirong Zhang & Shuangsheng Wu & Dapei Jiang, 2020. "Hybrid TODIM Method for Law Enforcement Possibility Evaluation of Judgment Debtor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Xiaoli Tian & Zeshui Xu & Xinxin Wang & Jing Gu & Fawaz E. Alsaadi, 2019. "Decision Models to Find a Promising Start-Up Firm with Qualiflex under Probabilistic Linguistic Circumstance," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1379-1402, July.
    6. Pu Ji & Hong-yu Zhang & Jian-qiang Wang, 2017. "Fuzzy decision-making framework for treatment selection based on the combined QUALIFLEX–TODIM method," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(14), pages 3072-3086, October.
    7. Juan-juan Peng & Jian-qiang Wang & Wu-E Yang, 2017. "A multi-valued neutrosophic qualitative flexible approach based on likelihood for multi-criteria decision-making problems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 425-435, January.
    8. Min, Hokey & Melachrinoudis, Emanuel & Wu, Xing, 1997. "Dynamic expansion and location of an airport: A multiple objective approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 403-417, September.
    9. Yang, Zhongzhen & Yu, Shunan & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Airport location in multiple airport regions (MARs): The role of land and airside accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 98-110.
    10. Zhang-peng Tian & Jing Wang & Jian-qiang Wang & Hong-yu Zhang, 2017. "Simplified Neutrosophic Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach to Green Product Development," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 597-627, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:9:y:1977:i:8:p:883-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.