IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v52y2020i1p216-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Berndt

    (Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Marion Werner

    (Department of Geography, SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States)

  • Víctor Ramiro Fernández

    (Universidad Nacional del Litoral/CONICET, Instituto de Investigación Estado Territorio y Economía, Santa Fe, Argentina)

Abstract

While postneoliberalism is often interpreted as a societal reaction against the deleterious effects of marketization in Latin America, this paper develops a finer-grained Polanyian institutional analysis to gain better analytical purchase on the ambivalent outcomes of postneoliberal reforms. Drawing on recent insights in economic geography, and in dialogue with the Latin American structuralist tradition, we elaborate our framework through a case study of the Argentinian soy boom of the 2000s, identifying forms of market extension, redistribution, reciprocity and householding that facilitated this process. We argue for a multi-scalar approach that balances attention to national and extra-local dynamics shaping the combination of these forms, identified through the lens of the “fictitious commodities†of the soy boom: money (credit, currency and cross-border capital flows), land (in the agricultural heartland and frontier regions), labor (transformed and excluded in a “farming without farmers†model) and, we add, knowledge (biotech). Our analysis identifies internal tensions as well as overt resistance and “overflow†that ultimately led to the collapse of postneoliberal regulation of the soy complex, ushering in a wider, market-radical counter-movement. Refracting double-movement-type dynamics through the prism of heterodox institutional forms, we argue, allows for a better grasp of processes that underlie institutional recalibrations of progressive and regressive kinds.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Berndt & Marion Werner & Víctor Ramiro Fernández, 2020. "Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 216-236, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:1:p:216-236
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19825657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19825657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X19825657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Geoff, 2018. "Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87253, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Bob Jessop, 2007. "Knowledge as a Fictitious Commodity: Insights and Limits of a Polanyian Perspective," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century, chapter 6, pages 115-133, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Prado, Antonio & Bárcena Ibarra, Alicia, 2016. "Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 40121 edited by Eclac, May.
    4. Jamie Peck, 2013. "Disembedding Polanyi: Exploring Polanyian Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1536-1544, July.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2013. "For Polanyian Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1545-1568, July.
    6. Ocampo, José Antonio, 2016. "Latin America and world economic turmoil," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 43337, May.
    7. Virginia Brown-Keyder, 2007. "Intellectual Property: Commodification and Its Discontents," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century, chapter 8, pages 155-170, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Jean Grugel & Pía Riggirozzi, 2012. "Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1268-1290, September.
    10. Ocampo, Jose Antonio & Ros, Jaime (ed.), 2011. "The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199571048.
    11. Marion Werner & Jennifer Bair & Victor Ramiro Fernández, 2014. "Linking Up to Development? Global Value Chains and the Making of a Post-Washington Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(6), pages 1219-1247, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Stokes-Ramos, 2023. "Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1970-1988, November.
    2. Jun Zhang, 2017. "Commodifying art, Chinese style: The making of China’s visual art market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(9), pages 2025-2045, September.
    3. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    4. Spies-Butcher, Ben & Bryant, Gareth, 2024. "The history and future of the tax state: Possibilities for a new fiscal politics beyond neoliberalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    6. Laura Aufrère & Philippe Eynaud & Lionel Maurel & Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, 2020. "How to conceptualize an alternative to platform capitalism according to the re-embedding process of K. Polanyi ? [Comment penser l'alternative au capitalisme de plateforme dans une logique de réenc," Working Papers hal-02536020, HAL.
    7. Matthew Thompson & Vicky Nowak & Alan Southern & Jackie Davies & Peter Furmedge, 2020. "Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1171-1194, September.
    8. Nick Bernards, 2019. "Tracing mutations of neoliberal development governance: ‘Fintech’, failure and the politics of marketization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1442-1459, October.
    9. Pablo Mendez, 2016. "Professional experts and lay knowledge in Vancouver’s accessory apartment rental market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2223-2238, November.
    10. Rajiv Sharma & Eric Knight, 2016. "The Role of Information Density in Infrastructure Investment," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 520-534, December.
    11. Christian Berndt & Norma M. Rantisi & Jamie Peck, 2020. "M/market frontiers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 14-26, February.
    12. Gareth Bryant & Ben Spies-Butcher, 2020. "Bringing finance inside the state: How income-contingent loans blur the boundaries between debt and tax," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 111-129, February.
    13. Goodwin, Geoff, 2022. "Double movements and disembedded economies: a response to Richard Sandbrook," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113686, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Damien Cahill, 2020. "Market analysis beyond market fetishism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 27-45, February.
    15. Rob Krueger & David Gibbs & Constance Carr, 2018. "Examining regional competitiveness and the pressures of rapid growth: An interpretive institutionalist account of policy responses in three city regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 965-986, September.
    16. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Ihnji Jon, 2024. "Reassembling the politics of “Green†urban redevelopment in East Garfield Park: A Polanyian approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1005-1023, June.
    18. Felix Behling & Mark Harvey, 2015. "The evolution of false self-employment in the British construction industry: a neo-Polanyian account of labour market formation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(6), pages 969-988, December.
    19. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 173-199, February.
    20. Anitra Baliga, 2024. "Chasing land, chasing crisis: Interrogating speculative urban development through developers’ pursuit of land commodification in Mumbai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(2), pages 349-366, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:1:p:216-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.