IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v45y2013i7p1679-1694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living without Fruit Flies: Biosecuring Horticulture and its Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Phillips

    (Australian Centre for Cultural Environmental Research, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, Australia)

Abstract

In this paper, informed by more-than-human and biosecurity literatures, I attend a neglected nonhuman considered a serious agricultural pest: the fruit fly. In addressing what it takes to live without fruit flies, biosecurity is theorised as ongoing, enacted achievement sustained (or not) by everyday and eventful interactions of heterogeneous spaces, strategies, and participants—human and nonhuman. Relations of fruits, flies, and people are explored through one vital attempt to biosecure life: Australia's Fruit Fly Exclusion Zone (FFEZ), a tristate pest-free area established to protect commercial horticulture from the fruit fly. Fruit flies become problematised as their appetites and mobilities confound fruit production and marketing, and affiliated biosecurity controls. Making fruit safe enrolls policy and agricultural sectors, but also more dispersed agents (travellers, residents, trees) and management sites (primarily off-farm). Since its introduction, the FFEZ's ongoing biosecuring normalised, with only occasional outbreak events. However, recent unprecedented outbreaks evoke questions about the FFEZ's future status. In such eventful times, it is worth reflecting on what kinds of living are possible in biosecurity zones—for flies, for resident human communities, and for agrifood networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Phillips, 2013. "Living without Fruit Flies: Biosecuring Horticulture and its Markets," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1679-1694, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:1679-1694
    DOI: 10.1068/a45274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a45274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a45274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Mather & Amy Marshall, 2011. "Living with disease? Biosecurity and avian influenza in ostriches," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(2), pages 153-165, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David M. Evans & Peter Jackson & Monica Truninger & João A. Baptista, 2022. "The ontological politics of freshness: Qualities of food and sustainability governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 461-476, May.
    2. Carol Farbotko & Kirsten Maclean & Cathy Robinson, 2016. "Performing a plant biosecurity emergency: The generation of disease absence and presence in Northern Australia banana plantations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 771-788, April.
    3. Jennifer Atchison, 2015. "Experiments in co-existence: the science and practices of biocontrol in invasive species management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(8), pages 1697-1712, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laure Bonnaud & Nicolas Fortané, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 125-149, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:1679-1694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.