IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i8p2023-2039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Mobility in Regeneration Areas: Trends, Drivers, and Implications; Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Pearson
  • Paul Lawless

Abstract

The nature, extent, and impact of residential mobility have attracted considerable interest. Little of this work has explored relationships between mobility and outcomes for area-based regeneration schemes. England's New Deal for Communities (NDC) Programme marks a departure from previous regeneration programmes in terms of levels of funding and time span. Evidence suggests that between 2002 and 2006 the thirty-nine NDC areas were subject to complex patterns of mobility, the most important drivers of which were age and tenure. Residents moving out of NDC areas did so for housing and environmental reasons and were less disadvantaged than those who stayed. Those moving into the areas during this period were not more disadvantaged than existing residents. Although there are associations between mobility and outcome change, these are not as strong as might be anticipated and their implications for area-based regeneration policy appear relatively marginal.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Pearson & Paul Lawless, 2012. "Population Mobility in Regeneration Areas: Trends, Drivers, and Implications; Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 2023-2039, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:2023-2039
    DOI: 10.1068/a44679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44679
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Clark, 2008. "Reexamining the moving to opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(3), pages 515-535, August.
    2. Matthieu Permentier & Maarten van Ham & Gideon Bolt, 2009. "Neighbourhood Reputation and the Intention to Leave the Neighbourhood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(9), pages 2162-2180, September.
    3. Birgitta Rabe & Mark Taylor, 2010. "Residential mobility, quality of neighbourhood and life course events," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(3), pages 531-555, July.
    4. Peteke Feijten & Maarten van Ham, 2009. "Neighbourhood Change... Reason to Leave?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2103-2122, September.
    5. Travers, Tony & Tunstall, Rebecca & Whitehead, Christine M. E. & Pruvot, Segolene, 2007. "Population mobility and service provision: a report for London Councils," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42756, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clark, William A.V. & van Ham, Maarten & Coulter, Rory, 2011. "Socio-Spatial Mobility in British Society," IZA Discussion Papers 5861, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. William AV Clark & Rory Coulter, 2015. "Who wants to move? The role of neighbourhood change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(12), pages 2683-2709, December.
    3. Lina Hedman & Maarten van Ham & David Manley, 2011. "Neighbourhood Choice and Neighbourhood Reproduction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1381-1399, June.
    4. Coulter, Rory & van Ham, Maarten & Feijten, Peteke, 2011. "Partner (Dis)agreement on Moving Desires and the Subsequent Moving Behaviour of Couples," IZA Discussion Papers 5612, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Christoph Kern, 2014. "Regional Structures and Mobility Dispositions: A Multilevel Proportional- & Partial-Proportional Odds Approach," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 681, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Matt Vogel & Merle Zwiers, 2018. "The Consequences of Spatial Inequality for Adolescent Residential Mobility," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Sanne Boschman & Maarten van Ham, 2015. "Neighbourhood selection of non-Western ethnic minorities: testing the own-group effects hypothesis using a conditional logit model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(5), pages 1155-1174, May.
    8. Philipp M. Lersch, 2013. "Place Stratification or Spatial Assimilation? Neighbourhood Quality Changes after Residential Mobility for Migrants in Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(5), pages 1011-1029, April.
    9. Ad Coenen & Pieter-Paul Verhaeghe & Bart Van de Putte, 2019. "Ethnic Residential Segregation: A Family Matter? An Integration of Household Composition Characteristics into the Residential Segregation Literature," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(5), pages 1023-1052, December.
    10. Stefanie DeLuca & Philip M. E. Garboden & Peter Rosenblatt, 2013. "Segregating Shelter," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 647(1), pages 268-299, May.
    11. Kawtar Najib, 2018. "Interdependence Evaluation between the Home Neighborhood and the City: How Socio-Spatial Categorization Impacts upon Residential Segregation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Jo Blanden & Emilia Del Bono & Sandra McNally & Birgitta Rabe, 2016. "Universal Pre‐school Education: The Case of Public Funding with Private Provision," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(592), pages 682-723, May.
    13. Zwiers, Merle & van Ham, Maarten & Manley, David, 2016. "Trajectories of Neighborhood Change: Spatial Patterns of Increasing Ethnic Diversity," IZA Discussion Papers 10216, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Elizabeth M. Lawrence & Elisabeth Root & Stefanie Mollborn, 2015. "Residential mobility in early childhood," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(32), pages 939-950.
    15. Zong, Weiyan & Zhang, Junyi & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2023. "Building a life-course intertemporal discrete choice model to analyze migration biographies," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    16. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Cheti Nicoletti & Birgitta Rabe, 2013. "Inequality in Pupils' Test Scores: How Much do Family, Sibling Type and Neighbourhood Matter?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 80(318), pages 197-218, April.
    18. Beata Nowok & Maarten van Ham & Allan M Findlay & Vernon Gayle, 2013. "Does Migration Make You Happy? A Longitudinal Study of Internal Migration and Subjective Well-Being," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 986-1002, April.
    19. Naz Onel & Avinandan Mukherjee, 2014. "The effects of national culture and human development on environmental health," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-101, February.
    20. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:2023-2039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.