IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i7p1607-1623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holding the Future Together: Towards a Theorisation of the Spaces and Times of Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Gavin Brown
  • Peter Kraftl
  • Jenny Pickerill
  • Caroline Upton

Abstract

Social scientists often use the notion of ‘transition’ to denote diverse trajectories of change in different types of bodies: from individuals, to communities, to nation-states. Yet little work has theorised how transition might occur across, between, or beyond these bodies. The aim of this paper is to sketch out a multiple, synthetic, and generative (but by no means universal) theory of transition. Primarily drawing on the British context, we explore and exemplify two contentions. Firstly, that the notion of transition is increasingly being deployed to frame and combine discourses in terms of community development, responses to environmental change, and the individual lifecourse. Specifically framed as ‘transition’, such discourses are gaining increasing purchase in imagining futures that reconfigure, but do not transform, assumed neoliberal futures. Our second contention is that these discourses and policies must try to ‘hold the future together’ in one or more senses. They must wrestle with a tension between imminent threats (climate change, economic nonproductivity) which weigh heavily on the present and its possible futures, and the precarious act of redirecting those futures in ways that might better hold together diverse social groups, communities, and places.

Suggested Citation

  • Gavin Brown & Peter Kraftl & Jenny Pickerill & Caroline Upton, 2012. "Holding the Future Together: Towards a Theorisation of the Spaces and Times of Transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(7), pages 1607-1623, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:7:p:1607-1623
    DOI: 10.1068/a44608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44608
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Nye & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Timothy Foxon, 2010. "Sociopsychological Perspectives on the Active Roles of Domestic Actors in Transition to a Lower Carbon Electricity Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 697-714, March.
    2. Carolyn Hendriks, 2009. "Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 341-368, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Strunz, Sebastian, 2013. "The German energy transition as a regime shift," UFZ Discussion Papers 10/2013, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Gerald Taylor Aiken, 2017. "The politics of community: Togetherness, transition and post-politics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2383-2401, October.
    3. Stewart Barr & Justin Pollard, 2017. "Geographies of Transition: Narrating environmental activism in an age of climate change and ‘Peak Oil’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 47-64, January.
    4. Iulian Barba Lata & Martijn Duineveld, 2019. "A harbour on land: De Ceuvel’s topologies of creative reuse," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1758-1774, November.
    5. Strunz, Sebastian, 2014. "The German energy transition as a regime shift," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 150-158.
    6. Joana Ramanauskaitė, 2021. "The Role of Incumbent Actors in Sustainability Transitions: A Case of LITHUANIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Karni Lotan Marcus, 2018. "The Pyramid Fallacy: Self-Organizing Decentralized Open Systems for Sustainable Collective Action," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    8. N/A, 2012. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(7), pages 1529-1535, July.
    9. Marc Wolfram & Niki Frantzeskaki, 2016. "Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Dalal Elarji, 2022. "Minor Spatial Tactics from the Floating University Berlin and Agrocité Paris," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    11. Gerald Taylor Aiken, 2019. "Community as tool for low carbon transitions: Involvement and containment, policy and action," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 732-749, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgia Silvestri & Julia M. Wittmayer & Karlijn Schipper & Robinah Kulabako & Sampson Oduro-Kwarteng & Philip Nyenje & Hans Komakech & Roel Van Raak, 2018. "Transition Management for Improving the Sustainability of WASH Services in Informal Settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa—An Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Mary Lawhon, 2012. "Contesting power, trust and legitimacy in the South African e-waste transition," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 69-86, March.
    3. Jens Newig & Daniel Schulz & Daniel Fischer & Katharina Hetze & Norman Laws & Gesa Lüdecke & Marco Rieckmann, 2013. "Communication Regarding Sustainability: Conceptual Perspectives and Exploration of Societal Subsystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Fagerberg, Jan, 2018. "Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1568-1576.
    5. Bale, Catherine S.E. & McCullen, Nicholas J. & Foxon, Timothy J. & Rucklidge, Alastair M. & Gale, William F., 2013. "Harnessing social networks for promoting adoption of energy technologies in the domestic sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 833-844.
    6. Michael B. Wironen & Robert V. Bartlett & Jon D. Erickson, 2019. "Deliberation and the Promise of a Deeply Democratic Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Isoaho, Karoliina & Karhunmaa, Kamilla, 2019. "A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 930-942.
    8. Menno Ottens & Jurian Edelenbos, 2018. "Political Leadership as Meta-Governance in Sustainability Transitions: A Case Study Analysis of Meta-Governance in the Case of the Dutch National Agreement on Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Lars Sorge & Anne Neumann & Christian von Hirschhausen & Ben Wealer, 2019. "Nuclear Power, Democracy, Development, and Nuclear Warheads: Determinants for Introducing Nuclear Power," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1811, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Andrea Felicetti, 2021. "Systemic Unsustainability as a Threat to Democracy," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(4), pages 431-451, August.
    11. Niki Frantzeskaki & Joop Koppenjan & Derk Loorbach & Neal Ryan, 2012. "Concluding editorial: Sustainability transitions and their governance: lessons and next-step challenges," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1/2), pages 173-186.
    12. Lorraine Whitmarsh & Saffron O'Neill & Irene Lorenzoni, 2011. "Climate Change or Social Change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond Disciplines," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 258-261, February.
    13. Phil Johnstone & Andy Stirling, 2015. "Comparing Nuclear Power Trajectories inGermany And the UK: From ‘Regimes’ to ‘Democracies’ in Sociotechnical Transitions and Discontinuities," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-18, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    14. Grant-Muller, Susan & Usher, Mark, 2014. "Intelligent Transport Systems: The propensity for environmental and economic benefits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 149-166.
    15. Luciana Maria Miu & Natalia Wisniewska & Christoph Mazur & Jeffrey Hardy & Adam Hawkes, 2018. "A Simple Assessment of Housing Retrofit Policies for the UK: What Should Succeed the Energy Company Obligation?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Pedro Macedo & Ana Huertas & Cristiano Bottone & Juan del Río & Nicola Hillary & Tommaso Brazzini & Julia M. Wittmayer & Gil Penha-Lopes, 2020. "Learnings from Local Collaborative Transformations: Setting a Basis for a Sustainability Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Perri, Cecilia & Giglio, Carlo & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2020. "Smart users for smart technologies: Investigating the intention to adopt smart energy consumption behaviors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Debbie Hopkins & Tim Schwanen, 2018. "Automated Mobility Transitions: Governing Processes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Phillips, Martin & Dickie, Jennifer, 2019. "Moving to or from a carbon dependent countryside," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 253-268.
    20. Anneleen Kenis & Matthias Lievens, 2017. "Imagining the carbon neutral city: The (post)politics of time and space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1762-1778, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:7:p:1607-1623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.