IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v43y2011i8p1965-1980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Gridded Population Models Using 2001 Northern Ireland Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • David Martin

    (Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton S017 1BJ, England)

  • Chris Lloyd

    (School of Geography, Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland)

  • Ian Shuttleworth

Abstract

There is growing interest in the use of gridded population models which potentially offer advantages of stability through time and ease of integration with nonpopulation data sources. This paper assesses the accuracy of models of the type introduced by Martin in 1989. Population counts for census output areas (OAs) are reallocated to a 100 m grid and then compared with true 100 m cell population counts uniquely available from the 2001 Northern Ireland Census. This analysis is novel, being the first large-scale assessment of gridded population models against true gridded population counts. We find evidence that kernel width and cell size are more important than the distance-decay parameter; that local mass preservation approaches are more appropriate in urban areas; but that the spatial scale of input data is more important than model parameters. It is suggested that more attention needs to be given to the varying spatial structures of population between places and that incorporating this information through geostatistical approaches could yield further insights.

Suggested Citation

  • David Martin & Chris Lloyd & Ian Shuttleworth, 2011. "Evaluation of Gridded Population Models Using 2001 Northern Ireland Census Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(8), pages 1965-1980, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:8:p:1965-1980
    DOI: 10.1068/a43485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a43485
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a43485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julii S Brainard & Andrew P Jones & Ian J Bateman & Andrew A Lovett & Peter J Fallon, 2002. "Modelling Environmental Equity: Access to Air Quality in Birmingham, England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(4), pages 695-716, April.
    2. Jane Fielding, 2007. "Environmental Injustice or Just the Lie of the Land: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Class of those at Risk from Flooding in England and Wales," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(4), pages 12-34, August.
    3. M F Goodchild & L Anselin & U Deichmann, 1993. "A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(3), pages 383-397, March.
    4. Andrew A. Lovett & Julian P. Parfitt & Julii S. Brainard, 1997. "Using GIS in Risk Analysis: A Case Study of Hazardous Waste Transport," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(5), pages 625-633, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Nan & Huang, Hong & Su, Boni & Zhao, Jinlong, 2015. "Analysis of dynamic road risk for pedestrian evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 171-183.
    2. Hanneke Kruize & Mariël Droomers & Irene Van Kamp & Annemarie Ruijsbroek, 2014. "What Causes Environmental Inequalities and Related Health Effects? An Analysis of Evolving Concepts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Zhe Huang & Emily Ying Yang Chan & Chi Shing Wong & Benny Chung Ying Zee, 2021. "Clustering of Socioeconomic Data in Hong Kong for Planning Better Community Health Protection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Paolo Postiglione & Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2020. "Economic Convergence in EU NUTS 3 Regions: A Spatial Econometric Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Nan Xu & Jiancheng Luo & Jin Zuo & Xiaodong Hu & Jing Dong & Tianjun Wu & Songliang Wu & Hao Liu, 2020. "Accurate Suitability Evaluation of Large-Scale Roof Greening Based on RS and GIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Jing Yao & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Serving regional demand in facility location," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 643-662, August.
    7. Germani, Anna Rita & Morone, Piergiuseppe & Testa, Giuseppina, 2014. "Environmental justice and air pollution: A case study on Italian provinces," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 69-82.
    8. Chunlin Xin & Jie Wang & Ziping Wang & Chia-Huei Wu & Muhammad Nawaz & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2022. "Reverse logistics research of municipal hazardous waste: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1495-1531, February.
    9. Zhang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Guoxing & Su, Bin, 2022. "The spatial impacts of air pollution and socio-economic status on public health: Empirical evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Fulong Wu & David Martin, 2002. "Urban Expansion Simulation of Southeast England Using Population Surface Modelling and Cellular Automata," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(10), pages 1855-1876, October.
    11. Nigel Walford, 2013. "Development and Design of a Web-Based Interface to Address Geographical Incompatibility in Spatial Units," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1713-1733, July.
    12. Bert van Wee, 2011. "Transport and Ethics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14281.
    13. Francesca Bitonti & Federico Benassi & Angelo Mazza & Salvatore Strozza, 2023. "Framing the Residential Patterns of Asian Communities in Three Italian Cities: Evidence from Milan, Rome, and Naples," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, August.
    14. Polash Banerjee & Mrinal K. Ghose, 2017. "A geographic information system-based socioeconomic impact assessment of the broadening of national highway in Sikkim Himalayas: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2333-2354, December.
    15. Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2021. "Deprivation at local level: Practical problems and policy implications for the province of Milan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 43-61, February.
    16. Dylan S Connor & Aleksander K BergArizona & Tom Kemeny & Peter J Kedron, 2024. "Who gets left behind by left behind places?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 37-58.
    17. David Tàbara & David Saurí & Rufí Cerdan, 2003. "Forest Fire Risk Management and Public Participation in Changing Socioenvironmental Conditions: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Region," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 249-260, April.
    18. Yi Chen & Hui Liu & Zhicong Ye & Hao Zhang & Bifeng Jiang & Yang Zhang, 2022. "Social Justice in Urban–Rural Flood Exposure: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Sébastien Breau & Dieter F. Kogler & Kenyon C. Bolton, 2014. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 351-373, October.
    20. Jeremy Forbes & Dianne Cook & Rob J Hyndman, 2019. "Spatial modelling of the two-party preferred vote in Australian federal elections: 2001-2016," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 8/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:8:p:1965-1980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.