IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v45y2013i7p1713-1733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Design of a Web-Based Interface to Address Geographical Incompatibility in Spatial Units

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Walford

    (Centre for Earth and Environmental Sciences Research, School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, England)

Abstract

The issue of how to address geographical incompatibility between aggregate statistical data sources is one affecting researchers in many countries. The increased amount of data from recent British Population Censuses has been accompanied by considerable changes in both administrative and electoral boundaries as well as those of areas specifically defined for census data collection and statistical output purposes. This paper reviews the extent of geographical inconsistency at different spatial scales and outlines the development of a web-based interface that implements an intelligent areal interpolation (dasymetric mapping) algorithm that enables estimates of census counts to be obtained for consistent spatial units across pairs of recent British censuses (1981, 1991, and 2001). A limited-access user trial has been carried out and the paper illustrates a typical user query that seeks to estimate 1981 population counts in 1991 enumeration district boundaries. The paper concludes by considering further development of the interface, its incorporation into the services provided by existing census data units in the UK, and its wider potential for addressing the issues of geographical incompatibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Walford, 2013. "Development and Design of a Web-Based Interface to Address Geographical Incompatibility in Spatial Units," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1713-1733, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:1713-1733
    DOI: 10.1068/a45377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a45377
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a45377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M F Goodchild & L Anselin & U Deichmann, 1993. "A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(3), pages 383-397, March.
    2. Cockings, Samantha & Martin, David, 2005. "Zone design for environment and health studies using pre-aggregated data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2729-2742, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samantha Cockings & Andrew Harfoot & David Martin & Duncan Hornby, 2013. "Getting the Foundations Right: Spatial Building Blocks for Official Population Statistics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1403-1420, June.
    2. I. G. Shuttleworth & C. D. Lloyd & D. J. Martin, 2011. "Exploring the implications of changing census output geographies for the measurement of residential segregation: the example of Northern Ireland 1991–2001," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Severine Deguen & Nina Ahlers & Morgane Gilles & Arlette Danzon & Marion Carayol & Denis Zmirou-Navier & Wahida Kihal-Talantikite, 2018. "Using a Clustering Approach to Investigate Socio-Environmental Inequality in Preterm Birth—A Study Conducted at Fine Spatial Scale in Paris (France)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Paolo Postiglione & Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2020. "Economic Convergence in EU NUTS 3 Regions: A Spatial Econometric Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Nan Xu & Jiancheng Luo & Jin Zuo & Xiaodong Hu & Jing Dong & Tianjun Wu & Songliang Wu & Hao Liu, 2020. "Accurate Suitability Evaluation of Large-Scale Roof Greening Based on RS and GIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Jing Yao & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Serving regional demand in facility location," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 643-662, August.
    7. Chunzhu Wei & Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Thomas Blaschke, 2016. "Local Geographic Variation of Public Services Inequality: Does the Neighborhood Scale Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Samantha Cockings & Andrew Harfoot & David Martin & Duncan Hornby, 2011. "Maintaining Existing Zoning Systems Using Automated Zone-Design Techniques: Methods for Creating the 2011 Census Output Geographies for England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(10), pages 2399-2418, October.
    9. Francesca Bitonti & Federico Benassi & Angelo Mazza & Salvatore Strozza, 2023. "Framing the Residential Patterns of Asian Communities in Three Italian Cities: Evidence from Milan, Rome, and Naples," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, August.
    10. Polash Banerjee & Mrinal K. Ghose, 2017. "A geographic information system-based socioeconomic impact assessment of the broadening of national highway in Sikkim Himalayas: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2333-2354, December.
    11. Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2021. "Deprivation at local level: Practical problems and policy implications for the province of Milan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 43-61, February.
    12. Dylan S Connor & Aleksander K BergArizona & Tom Kemeny & Peter J Kedron, 2024. "Who gets left behind by left behind places?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 37-58.
    13. Mi-Kyeong Kim & Sangpil Kim & Hong-Gyoo Sohn, 2018. "Relationship between Spatio-Temporal Travel Patterns Derived from Smart-Card Data and Local Environmental Characteristics of Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Rainham, Daniel & McDowell, Ian & Krewski, Daniel & Sawada, Mike, 2010. "Conceptualizing the healthscape: Contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 668-676, March.
    15. Sébastien Breau & Dieter F. Kogler & Kenyon C. Bolton, 2014. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 351-373, October.
    16. Siegel, Martin & Koller, Daniela & Vogt, Verena & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2016. "Developing a composite index of spatial accessibility across different health care sectors: A German example," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 205-212.
    17. Chandra, Aitichya & Sharath, M.N. & Pani, Agnivesh & Sahu, Prasanta K., 2021. "A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to design optimal zoning systems for freight transportation planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Jeremy Forbes & Dianne Cook & Rob J Hyndman, 2019. "Spatial modelling of the two-party preferred vote in Australian federal elections: 2001-2016," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 8/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Chunzhu Wei & Mark Padgham & Pablo Cabrera Barona & Thomas Blaschke, 2017. "Scale-Free Relationships between Social and Landscape Factors in Urban Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Nannan Gao & Fen Li & Hui Zeng & Daniël van Bilsen & Martin De Jong, 2019. "Can More Accurate Night-Time Remote Sensing Data Simulate a More Detailed Population Distribution?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:1713-1733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.