IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i2p339-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing Nature Conservation: The European Union Habitats Directive and Conflict around Estuary Management

Author

Listed:
  • David Gibbs

    (Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England)

  • Aidan While

    (Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S3 7ND, England)

  • Andrew E G Jonas

    (Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England)

Abstract

Demands for increased levels of protection for species and ecosystems are being translated into new modes of spatial governance at national, regional, and local scales. As part of this, new ways of analysing and representing ecological systems are leading to qualitatively different treatment of the (time) spaces of nature conservation. In this paper we explore what happens when the land-use demands of new paradigms of nature conservation collide with preestablished modes of spatial regulation, taking as our focus the implementation of the European Union Habitats Directive in estuary spaces in the United Kingdom. We provide evidence of the ways in which ecological regulation is reshaping political–economic landscapes and offer insights into the direction of ‘postmodern’ nature conservation practice, including the extent to which theoretical notions of hybrid and nonequilibrium systems have become absorbed into conflicts around ecological regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Gibbs & Aidan While & Andrew E G Jonas, 2007. "Governing Nature Conservation: The European Union Habitats Directive and Conflict around Estuary Management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 339-358, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:2:p:339-358
    DOI: 10.1068/a37399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a37399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gavin Bridge & Andrew E G Jonas, 2002. "Governing Nature: The Reregulation of Resource Access, Production, and Consumption," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 759-766, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raoul Beunen & Kristof van Assche, 2013. "Contested Delineations: Planning, Law, and the Governance of Protected Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1285-1301, June.
    2. Sabrina Lai, 2011. "Management Plans for Natura 2000 Sites and the Wider Planning System: Imperfect Advancements from Sardinia (Italy)," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1508, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Alastor M. Coleby & Dan van der Horst & Klaus Hubacek & Chris Goodier & Paul J. Burgess & Anil Graves & Richard Lord & David Howard, 2012. "Environmental Impact Assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 369-385, July.
    4. Sabrina Lai, 2020. "Hindrances to Effective Implementation of the Habitats Directive in Italy: Regional Differences in Designating Special Areas of Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Iker Etxano & Eneko Garmendia & Unai Pascual & David Hoyos & María-à ngeles Díez & José A. Cadiñanos & Pedro J. Lozano, 2015. "A participatory integrated assessment approach for Natura 2000 network sites," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 1207-1232, October.
    6. Marco Antunes & Teresa Fidélis & Miguel Lucas Pires, 2022. "The Protection of Estuarine Margins under the Maritime–Terrestrial Public Domain, the Cases of Portugal, Angola, Brazil, and Mozambique," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Phil Allmendinger & Tobias Chilla & Franziska Sielker, 2014. "Europeanizing Territoriality—Towards Soft Spaces?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2703-2717, November.
    8. Dan Lin, 2019. "Urban Growth-Oriented Green Accumulation: Ecological Conservation Planning in the Shenzhen DaPeng Peninsula in Southern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Chmielewski Waldemar & Głogowska Magdalena, 2015. "Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network in Poland – an Opportunity or a Threat to Sustainable Development of Rural Areas? Study on Local Stakeholders’ Perception," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 153-169, December.
    10. Tatiana Kluvánková-Oravská & Veronika Chobotová & Eva Smolková, 2013. "The Challenges of Policy Convergence: The Europeanization of Biodiversity Governance in an Enlarging Eu," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 401-413, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remus Creţan & Lucian Vesalon, 2017. "The Political Economy of Hydropower in the Communist Space: Iron Gates Revisited," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(5), pages 688-701, October.
    2. Evangelia Apostolopoulou & John D Pantis, 2010. "Development Plans versus Conservation: Explanation of Emergent Conflicts and State Political Handling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 982-1000, April.
    3. Yakun Zhang & Wenzhe Tang & Colin F. Duffield & Lihai Zhang & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2021. "Environment Management of Hydropower Development: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Maureen G Reed, 2007. "Uneven Environmental Management: A Canadian Comparative Political Ecology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 320-338, February.
    5. Shui-Yan Tang & Ching-Ping Tang, 2004. "Local Governance and Environmental Conservation: Gravel Politics and the Preservation of an Endangered Bird Species in Taiwan," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 173-189, January.
    6. Mnwana, Sonwabile & Bowman, Andrew, 2018. "Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:2:p:339-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.