IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v42y2010i4p982-1000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Plans versus Conservation: Explanation of Emergent Conflicts and State Political Handling

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelia Apostolopoulou
  • John D Pantis

Abstract

The growing establishment of protected areas incorporating profitable economic activity and conservation initiatives has been characterized by the exacerbation of existent conflicts and the emergence of new ones around them. Over the last two decades the participation of ‘civil society’ in protected areas governance under the mutual goal of sustainable development has become increasingly key to resolving natural resource conflicts. Schinias Greek Natura site, simultaneously national park and Olympic canoeing centre, provides a case study to investigate the roots and outcomes of natural resource conflicts within the context of the coexistence of development and conservation agendas and collaborative governance. Following a grounded-theory approach and drawing on insights from political ecology and environmental governance literature we have been able to reveal the political, socioeconomic, and conservation conflicts arising during implementation of state development and conservation policies. It appears that governmental political handling exacerbated these conflicts, leading to political manipulation to justify policy failure and promote nature privatization. We conclude that conflict resolution compatible with nature protection and social justice cannot occur in isolation from resolving crucial socioeconomic problems, strengthening transparency, and an accurate scientific analysis of the particularities of local communities to guide the formation and implementation of state policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelia Apostolopoulou & John D Pantis, 2010. "Development Plans versus Conservation: Explanation of Emergent Conflicts and State Political Handling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 982-1000, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:4:p:982-1000
    DOI: 10.1068/a42163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42163
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a42163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roderick Neumann, 1997. "Primitive Ideas: Protected Area Buffer Zones and the Politics of Land in Africa," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 28(3), pages 559-582, July.
    2. Lucy H. Ford, 2003. "Challenging Global Environmental Governance: Social Movement Agency and Global Civil Society," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 3(2), pages 120-134, May.
    3. Anja Nygren, 2000. "Development Discourses and Peasant–Forest Relations: Natural Resource Utilization as Social Process," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 31(1), pages 11-34, January.
    4. Gavin Bridge & Andrew E G Jonas, 2002. "Governing Nature: The Reregulation of Resource Access, Production, and Consumption," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 759-766, May.
    5. Maureen G Reed, 2007. "Uneven Environmental Management: A Canadian Comparative Political Ecology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 320-338, February.
    6. James McCarthy, 2002. "First World Political Ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use Movement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(7), pages 1281-1302, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maureen G Reed, 2007. "Uneven Environmental Management: A Canadian Comparative Political Ecology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 320-338, February.
    2. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    3. Yakun Zhang & Wenzhe Tang & Colin F. Duffield & Lihai Zhang & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2021. "Environment Management of Hydropower Development: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Siewe Siewe & Jacqueline M. Vadjunec & Beth Caniglia, 2017. "The Politics of Land Use in the Korup National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Büscher, Bram, 2009. "Connecting political economies of energy in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3951-3958, October.
    6. Jonathan W. Kuyper & Karin Bäckstrand, 2016. "Accountability and Representation: Nonstate Actors in UN Climate Diplomacy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 61-81, May.
    7. Petursson, Jon Geir & Vedeld, Paul & Sassen, Marieke, 2013. "An institutional analysis of deforestation processes in protected areas: The case of the transboundary Mt. Elgon, Uganda and Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 22-33.
    8. Aidan Keane & Heather Gurd & Dickson Kaelo & Mohammed Y Said & Jan de Leeuw & J Marcus Rowcliffe & Katherine Homewood, 2016. "Gender Differentiated Preferences for a Community-Based Conservation Initiative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Kate J. Neville & Glen Coulthard, 2019. "Transformative Water Relations: Indigenous Interventions in Global Political Economies," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Alida Cantor & Sarah Knuth, 2019. "Speculations on the postnatural: Restoration, accumulation, and sacrifice at the Salton Sea," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 527-544, March.
    11. Floriane Clement, 2010. "Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(2), pages 129-156, June.
    12. Theresa Selfa & Joanna Endter-Wada, 2008. "The Politics of Community-Based Conservation in Natural Resource Management: A Focus for International Comparative Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 948-965, April.
    13. Kauano, Érico Emed & Silva, José Maria Cardoso & Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola & Michalski, Fernanda, 2020. "Do protected areas hamper economic development of the Amazon region? An analysis of the relationship between protected areas and the economic growth of Brazilian Amazon municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Anya M. Galli & Dana R. Fisher, 2016. "Hybrid Arrangements as a Form of Ecological Modernization: The Case of the US Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Behrsin, Ingrid & Benner, Chris, 2017. "Contested spaces and subjectivities of transit: Political ecology of a bus rapid transit development in Oakland, California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 95-103.
    16. Patrick T Hurley & Peter A Walker, 2004. "Whose Vision? Conspiracy Theory and Land-Use Planning in Nevada County, California," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1529-1547, September.
    17. Leipold, Sina, 2014. "Creating forests with words — A review of forest-related discourse studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 12-20.
    18. Adams, William M. & Infield, Mark, 2003. "Who is on the Gorilla's Payroll? Claims on Tourist Revenue From a Ugandan National Park," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 177-190, January.
    19. Heubaum, Harald & Biermann, Frank, 2015. "Integrating global energy and climate governance: The changing role of the International Energy Agency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 229-239.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:4:p:982-1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.