IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v55y2012i3p369-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England

Author

Listed:
  • Alastor M. Coleby
  • Dan van der Horst
  • Klaus Hubacek
  • Chris Goodier
  • Paul J. Burgess
  • Anil Graves
  • Richard Lord
  • David Howard

Abstract

A consequence of the increased requirements for renewable energy is likely to be allocation of more land to bio-energy crop production. Recent regulatory changes in England, as in other parts of the UK, mean that changes in land-use are increasingly subject to screening through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This paper reviews these regulatory changes and explores the potential benefits of incorporating a fuller examination of ecosystem services within EIA procedures. The authors argue that such an approach could help achieve sustainability by identifying the best options within an area, rather than concentrating on the negative effects of selected proposed projects. It could also help highlight the benefits provided by existing and proposed agricultural, forestry, peri-urban and urban systems. However, successful implementation of an ecosystem services approach would also require a greater understanding of the societal preferences for the full range of ecosystem services at a landscape scale, aswell as the trade-offs and synergies between uses of specific services.

Suggested Citation

  • Alastor M. Coleby & Dan van der Horst & Klaus Hubacek & Chris Goodier & Paul J. Burgess & Anil Graves & Richard Lord & David Howard, 2012. "Environmental Impact Assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 369-385, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:3:p:369-385
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.603958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2011.603958
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2011.603958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gibbs & Aidan While & Andrew E G Jonas, 2007. "Governing Nature Conservation: The European Union Habitats Directive and Conflict around Estuary Management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 339-358, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Haojie, 2020. "Complementing conventional environmental impact assessments of tourism with ecosystem service valuation: A case study of the Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    2. Picchi, Paolo & van Lierop, Martina & Geneletti, Davide & Stremke, Sven, 2019. "Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-259.
    3. Yana Vodiak & Yurii Tsapko & Anatolii Kucher & Vitaliy Krupin & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Influence of Growing Miscanthus x giganteus on Ecosystem Services of Chernozem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chmielewski Waldemar & Głogowska Magdalena, 2015. "Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network in Poland – an Opportunity or a Threat to Sustainable Development of Rural Areas? Study on Local Stakeholders’ Perception," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 153-169, December.
    2. Raoul Beunen & Kristof van Assche, 2013. "Contested Delineations: Planning, Law, and the Governance of Protected Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1285-1301, June.
    3. Marco Antunes & Teresa Fidélis & Miguel Lucas Pires, 2022. "The Protection of Estuarine Margins under the Maritime–Terrestrial Public Domain, the Cases of Portugal, Angola, Brazil, and Mozambique," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Dan Lin, 2019. "Urban Growth-Oriented Green Accumulation: Ecological Conservation Planning in the Shenzhen DaPeng Peninsula in Southern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Tatiana Kluvánková-Oravská & Veronika Chobotová & Eva Smolková, 2013. "The Challenges of Policy Convergence: The Europeanization of Biodiversity Governance in an Enlarging Eu," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 401-413, June.
    6. Sabrina Lai, 2011. "Management Plans for Natura 2000 Sites and the Wider Planning System: Imperfect Advancements from Sardinia (Italy)," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1508, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Phil Allmendinger & Tobias Chilla & Franziska Sielker, 2014. "Europeanizing Territoriality—Towards Soft Spaces?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2703-2717, November.
    8. Sabrina Lai, 2020. "Hindrances to Effective Implementation of the Habitats Directive in Italy: Regional Differences in Designating Special Areas of Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Iker Etxano & Eneko Garmendia & Unai Pascual & David Hoyos & María-à ngeles Díez & José A. Cadiñanos & Pedro J. Lozano, 2015. "A participatory integrated assessment approach for Natura 2000 network sites," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 1207-1232, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:3:p:369-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.