IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v33y2001i5p881-900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Harris
  • Michael Lehman

Abstract

Although the fact is not widely acknowledged by urban scholars, because of the way that it is administered the property tax helps to shape the social geography of metropolitan areas. Research by public finance specialists has shown that cheap housing is often overassessed, and that variations in assessment ratios (the ratio of assessed to market values) usually favour the suburbs. Sales prices and assessment data from the Hamilton, Ontario, metropolitan area for 1976, 1996, and 1999 confirm these patterns and show that they are persistent. In addition, cross-tabulations by market value and location show that geographical variations in assessment ratios are caused by the inequitable treatment of inexpensive property, not vice versa. A 1998 reassessment made the situation worse. The main difficulty in reducing tax inequities is political, not technical.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Harris & Michael Lehman, 2001. "Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 881-900, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:5:p:881-900
    DOI: 10.1068/a33128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a33128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a33128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehta, Shekhar & Giertz, J. Fred, 1996. "Measuring the Performance of the Property Tax Assessment Process," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 49(1), pages 73-85, March.
    2. Melvin V. Borland, 1990. "On the Degree of Property Tax Assessment Inequity in Complex Tax Jurisdictions," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 431-438, October.
    3. J. S. Fuerst & Andrew Ditton, 1975. "Reducing Property Taxes: An Evaluation of a Collective Action," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(1), pages 94-97.
    4. Mehta, Shekhar & Giertz, J. Fred, 1996. "Measuring the Performance of the Property Tax Assessment Process," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 49(1), pages 73-85, March.
    5. Brian J. L. Berry & Robert S. Bednarz, 1975. "A Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single-Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(1), pages 21-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Meyer & Roger A. McCain & Paul Jensen, 2003. "Hybrid Real Estate Valuation Models with Neighborhood Effects: Marrying Geographic Information Systems and Nonlinear Econometrics," Computing in Economics and Finance 2003 17, Society for Computational Economics.
    2. Kathryn Furlong, 2012. "Good Water Governance without Good Urban Governance? Regulation, Service Delivery Models, and Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2721-2741, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Propheter, 2014. "Assessment Administration and Performance during the Great Recession," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(5), pages 662-685, September.
    2. Hamid Beladi & Nicholas S. P. Tay & Reza Oladi, 2011. "On Competition for Listings," Working Papers 0003, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    3. Kolbe, Jens & Schulz, Rainer & Wersing, Martin & Werwatz, Axel, 2019. "Land value appraisal using statistical methods," FORLand Working Papers 07 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    4. John Merrifield & Yong Bao, 2007. "Residential Property Taxation: Is Periodic Reassessment worth it?," Working Papers 0003, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    5. Gary C. Cornia & Barrett A. Slade, 2005. "Property Taxation of Multifamily Housing: An Empirical Analysis of Vertical and Horizontal Equity and Assessment Methods," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 27(1), pages 17-46.
    6. Jens Kolbe & Rainer Schulz & Martin Wersing & Axel Werwatz, 2019. "Bodenwertermittlung mit statistischen Methoden [Land value appraisal using statistical methods]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 5(1), pages 131-154, November.
    7. Hammes, Brian D., 1984. "Hedonic prices for farmland characteristics: an analysis of farm transactions prices for Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1984010108000017525, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Cotteleer, Geerte & Stobbe, Tracy & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2008. "Expert Opinion versus Transaction Evidence: Using the Reilly Index to Measure Open Space Premiums in the Urban-Rural Fringe," Working Papers 37085, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    9. Xiandeng Jiang & Zheng Pan & Ningru Zhao, 2023. "Relative Value vs Absolute Value: Housing Wealth and Labor Supply," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 41-76, January.
    10. Brannman, Lance & Buongiorno, Joseph & Fight, Roger, 1981. "Quality Adjusted Price Indices For Douglas-Fir Timber," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Marvin Wolverton, 1998. "Empirical Investigation into the Limitations of the Normative Paired Sales Adjustment Method," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 191-203, January.
    12. Larry V. Ellis & J. Paul Combs & William Weber, 1983. "Administrative Inequity in the Property Tax: Further Evidence," Public Finance Review, , vol. 11(4), pages 491-506, October.
    13. Shi, Song & Young, Martin & Hargreaves, Bob, 2009. "Issues in measuring a monthly house price index in New Zealand," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 336-350, December.
    14. Seth B. Payton, 2012. "The Impact of Property Assessment Standards on Property Tax Burden," Public Finance Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 584-613, September.
    15. James R. Follain JR & Stephen Malpezzi, 1981. "Another Look at Racial Differences in Housing Prices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 195-203, June.
    16. Shanaka Herath & Gunther Maier, 2010. "The Hedonic Price Method in Real Estate and Housing Market Research: A Review of the Literature," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2010_03, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    17. William C. Goolsby, 1997. "Assessment Error in the Valuation of Owner-Occupied Housing," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 13(1), pages 33-46.
    18. Stephen Malpezzi, "undated". "Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review," Wisconsin-Madison CULER working papers 02-05, University of Wisconsin Center for Urban Land Economic Research.
    19. Robert Inman, 1978. "Testing political economy’s ‘as if’ proposition: is the median income voter really decisive?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 45-65, December.
    20. Cotteleer, Geerte & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Expert opinion versus actual transaction evidence in the valuation of non-market amenities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 32-40.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:5:p:881-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.