IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p125-d1563192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Taxes, Better Revenue: A Case Study on Spatial Approaches to Land Taxation in Lebak Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Andri Hernandi

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Irwan Meilano

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Asep Yusup Saptari

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Deni Suwardhi

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Rizqi Abdulharis

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Alfita P. Handayani

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Sella L. Nurmaulia

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Nabila S. E. Putri

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Ratri Widyastuti

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Putri Merdekawati

    (Department of Geodesy and Geomatics, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
    Riau Province National Land Agency (Kanwil BPN Provinsi Riau), Pekanbaru 28126, Riau, Indonesia)

  • Fitri N. Cahyani

    (Department of Geodesy and Geomatics, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
    Sintang Regency National Land Agency (Kantah BPN Kabupaten Sintang), Sintang 78614, West Kalimantan, Indonesia)

Abstract

Land taxation, mainly the Land and Building Tax (LBT), is a critical revenue source for local governments in Indonesia, yet its contribution remains suboptimal due to inefficiencies in assessment and administration. This study focuses on the Lebak Regency to optimize the Sales Value of Taxable Objects (SVTO) assessment, a key determinant of LBT revenue. Using spatial analysis, Land Value Zones (LVZ), and socio-economic data, the research evaluates assessment ratios to identify discrepancies between SVTO and market values. Adjustments to SVTO are proposed based on spatial patterns, such as land use and infrastructure, and the Index of Developing Villages (IDV). Findings reveal significant disparities between assessed and market values, with assessment ratios ranging from 1% to 267%. Simulations indicate potential LBT revenue of IDR 224.7 billion under full compliance, compared to IDR 44.22 billion, the 2024 target. Adjustments based on spatial patterns from land use planning and village development indices enhance equity and accuracy in tax assessments, optimizing local revenues. Despite these improvements, the study’s limitations lie in the lack of community validation for the proposed methodology, which is essential to confirm its practicality and acceptance. Future research should address this gap and explore household-level dynamics, including tax affordability and spending patterns, to enhance policy inclusivity and align taxation systems with local socio-economic realities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andri Hernandi & Irwan Meilano & Asep Yusup Saptari & Deni Suwardhi & Rizqi Abdulharis & Alfita P. Handayani & Sella L. Nurmaulia & Nabila S. E. Putri & Ratri Widyastuti & Putri Merdekawati & Fitri N., 2025. "Fair Taxes, Better Revenue: A Case Study on Spatial Approaches to Land Taxation in Lebak Regency, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:125-:d:1563192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Morgan & Sina Shahab, 2023. "Impact of Land Value Tax on the Equity of Planning Outcomes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Yang, Zhou, 2018. "Differential effects of land value taxation," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 33-39.
    3. Owen Connellan & Frances Plimmer & William McCluskey, 2001. "Valuation Banding- An International Property Tax Solution?," ERES eres2001_138, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    4. Fischel, William A., 2001. "Homevoters, Municipal Corporate Governance, and the Benefit View of the Property Tax," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 54(1), pages 157-174, March.
    5. Azhari Aziz Samudra, 2024. "Property Tax in Indonesia: A Proposal for Increasing Land and Building Tax Revenue Using the System Dynamics Simulation Method," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 10(1), pages 100-121.
    6. Nicola Brandt, 2014. "Greening the Property Tax," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 17, OECD Publishing.
    7. Richard Harris & Michael Lehman, 2001. "Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 881-900, May.
    8. Fischel, William A., 2001. "Homevoters, Municipal Corporate Governance, and the Benefit View of the Property Tax," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 54(n. 1), pages 157-74, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilber, Christian A.L., 2010. "New housing supply and the dilution of social capital," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 419-437, May.
    2. George R. Zodrow, 2019. "Intrajurisdictional Capitalization and the Incidence of the Property Tax," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: George R Zodrow (ed.), TAXATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Selected Essays of George R. Zodrow, chapter 16, pages 489-522, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Robert Scherf & Matthew Weinzierl, 2020. "Understanding Different Approaches to Benefit‐Based Taxation," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 385-410, June.
    4. Philippe Bracke & Christian Hilber & Olmo Silva, 2014. "Homeownership and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Mortgage Debt and Commitment," CESifo Working Paper Series 5048, CESifo.
    5. John Landis & Vincent J. Reina, 2021. "Do Restrictive Land Use Regulations Make Housing More Expensive Everywhere?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 305-324, November.
    6. Fuess, Roland & Lerbs, Oliver, 2017. "Do Local Governments Tax Homeowner Communities Differently?," Working Papers on Finance 1714, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    7. Christian A. L. Hilber & Tracy M. Turner, 2014. "The Mortgage Interest Deduction and its Impact on Homeownership Decisions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(4), pages 618-637, October.
    8. Brunner, Eric & Balsdon, Ed, 2004. "Intergenerational conflict and the political economy of school spending," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 369-388, September.
    9. Thorsten Martin & Felix Arnold & Ronny Freier, 2015. "(Not) in my backyard? The impact of citizen initiatives on housing supply in Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa15p462, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Martin, Thorsten, 2017. "You shall not build! (until tomorrow) [:] Electoral cycles and housing policies in Germany," MPRA Paper 78998, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Martin, Thorsten & Arnold, Felix & Freier, Ronny, 2015. "(Not) in my backyard? The impact of citizen initiatives on housing supply in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112952, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Philippe Bracke & Christian Hilber & Olmo Silva, 2012. "Homeownerhip and Entrepreneurship," SERC Discussion Papers 0103, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. David J. Schwegman & John Yinger, 2020. "The Shifting of the Property Tax on Urban Renters: Evidence from New York State’s Homestead Tax Option," Working Papers 20-43, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    14. George R. Zodrow, 2019. "The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: George R Zodrow (ed.), TAXATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Selected Essays of George R. Zodrow, chapter 15, pages 461-487, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Agnese Sacchi & Simone Salotti, 2017. "The influence of decentralized taxes and intergovernmental grants on local spending volatility," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 507-522, April.
    16. Zodrow, George R., 2001. "The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 54(n. 1), pages 139-56, March.
    17. Hilber, Christian A.L. & Mayer, Christopher, 2009. "Why do households without children support local public schools? Linking house price capitalization to school spending," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 74-90, January.
    18. David Agorastos & Rowena Gray & Ronan Lyons & Allison Shertzer, 2024. "The Price of Housing in the United States, 1890–2006," Working Papers 24-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    19. Janmaat, Johannus A., 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement in Land Development Decisions: A Waste of Effort?," MPRA Paper 6147, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Christian Hilber & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2006. "Owners of Developed Land versus Owners of Undeveloped Land: Why Land Use is More Constrained in the Bay Area than in Pittsburgh," CEP Discussion Papers dp0760, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:125-:d:1563192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.